Started By
Message
re: Which Running Back Duo Would Rather Have?
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:30 am to Killean
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:30 am to Killean
quote:
So Duo C picked up 1,000 more yards than the other 2 duos in one fewer season?
Holy shite.. you should definitely take those guys.
Also less touchdowns and way worse team performance.
3
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:31 am to Killean
quote:
Holy shite.. you should definitely take those guys.
Of course you should if you only care about stats.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:32 am to boddagetta
Why does a RB matter with team performance? I guess Adrian Peterson sucks since the Vikings haven't won anything yet.
I could understand with a QB but that's a reach
I could understand with a QB but that's a reach
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:35 am to BamaDoc14
quote:
way worse team performance
Maybe, just maybe, that has something to do with defense each team fielded. You are a gump so I give you a free pass on not understanding that very simple concept to grasp
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:35 am to gohogs141
quote:
gohogs141
This guy gets it
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:35 am to BamaDoc14
quote:
way worse team performance.
So you wouldn't pick a player because other players on their team weren't up to their caliber?
The backwards logic on that one is mind blowing.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:39 am to BamaDoc14
quote:
way worse team performance.
has nothing to do with the topic. I know someone else brought it up
Also, this is a hard comparison to make, as some shared more time with the other rb then others in your stats. for instance with Bama's group.
Some played more games than others as well.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:41 am to NYCAuburn
Whichever one has Darren McFadden on it.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:44 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Also, this is a hard comparison to make, as some shared more time with the other rb then others in your stats. for instance with Bama's group.
Than*
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:45 am to NawlinsTigah270
This thread doesn't involve anything LSU related. We aren't talking about running backs by committee.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:48 am to BamaDoc14
You left out C's passing numbers
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:48 am to BamaDoc14
Funny coming from you. surprised you didnt make up some fake stats for the op, like usual
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:49 am to craigbiggio
Also C's kickoff return numbers..
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:51 am to Killean
quote:
Also C's kickoff return numbers
Doesnt matter, they are system backs, they all suck. it was just the system
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:51 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
So you wouldn't pick a player because other players on their team weren't up to their caliber?
Then also add in that one was coached by Nutt, and the others by Saban or Tubby.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:56 am to NYCAuburn
Surprised*
didn't*
usual.*
didn't*
usual.*
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:57 am to NYCAuburn
you also need to look at the strenth of the teams around them that year... if the SECw was down the year the stats appear better. so:
** Since 1956
A:
1:
Rushing Yards
2003 SEC 1307 (3rd)
2004 SEC 1165 (2nd)
Career SEC** 3831 (11th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2001 SEC 6 (9th)
2002 SEC 10 (5th)
2003 NCAA 17 (8th)
2003 SEC 17 (1st)
2004 SEC 12 (1st)
Career SEC** 45 (4th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2002 SEC 1008 (5th)
2004 SEC 913 (9th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2002 SEC 13 (1st)
2004 SEC 8 (4th)
B:
1:
Rushing Yards
2008 SEC 728 (6th)
2009 NCAA 1658 (4th)
2009 SEC 1658 (1st)
2010 SEC 875 (10th)
Career SEC** 3261 (20th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2008 SEC 12 (3rd)
2009 SEC 17 (1st)
2010 SEC 13 (6th)
Career SEC** 42 (7th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2009 SEC 751 (9th)
2011 NCAA 1679 (6th)
2011 SEC 1679 (1st)
Rushing Touchdowns
2009 SEC 8 (9th)
2011 NCAA 21 (5th)
2011 SEC 21 (1st)
Career SEC** 35 (16th)
C:
1:
Rushing Yards
2006 SEC 1168 (2nd)
2007 SEC 1162 (4th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2006 SEC 6 (10th)
2007 SEC 11 (7th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2005 SEC 1113 (5th)
2006 NCAA 1647 (5th)
2006 SEC 1647 (1st)
2007 NCAA 1830 (4th)
2007 SEC 1830 (1st)
Career SEC** 4590 (2nd)
Rushing Touchdowns
2005 SEC 11 (2nd)
2006 SEC 14 (1st)
2007 SEC 16 (2nd)
Career SEC** 41 (9th)
** Since 1956
A:
1:
Rushing Yards
2003 SEC 1307 (3rd)
2004 SEC 1165 (2nd)
Career SEC** 3831 (11th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2001 SEC 6 (9th)
2002 SEC 10 (5th)
2003 NCAA 17 (8th)
2003 SEC 17 (1st)
2004 SEC 12 (1st)
Career SEC** 45 (4th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2002 SEC 1008 (5th)
2004 SEC 913 (9th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2002 SEC 13 (1st)
2004 SEC 8 (4th)
B:
1:
Rushing Yards
2008 SEC 728 (6th)
2009 NCAA 1658 (4th)
2009 SEC 1658 (1st)
2010 SEC 875 (10th)
Career SEC** 3261 (20th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2008 SEC 12 (3rd)
2009 SEC 17 (1st)
2010 SEC 13 (6th)
Career SEC** 42 (7th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2009 SEC 751 (9th)
2011 NCAA 1679 (6th)
2011 SEC 1679 (1st)
Rushing Touchdowns
2009 SEC 8 (9th)
2011 NCAA 21 (5th)
2011 SEC 21 (1st)
Career SEC** 35 (16th)
C:
1:
Rushing Yards
2006 SEC 1168 (2nd)
2007 SEC 1162 (4th)
Rushing Touchdowns
2006 SEC 6 (10th)
2007 SEC 11 (7th)
2:
Rushing Yards
2005 SEC 1113 (5th)
2006 NCAA 1647 (5th)
2006 SEC 1647 (1st)
2007 NCAA 1830 (4th)
2007 SEC 1830 (1st)
Career SEC** 4590 (2nd)
Rushing Touchdowns
2005 SEC 11 (2nd)
2006 SEC 14 (1st)
2007 SEC 16 (2nd)
Career SEC** 41 (9th)
Posted on 6/17/14 at 11:00 am to BamaDoc14
quote:
BamaDoc14
Posted on 6/17/14 at 11:00 am to BamaDoc14
Lil Bro*
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News