Started By
Message

re: what snaps the sec football national championship winning streak...

Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:21 pm to
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105447 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

Stanford, Oregon and tOSU.
They aren't good enough bro, but I like the attempt.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

I just hope it's not this year


This really seems like a down year for the SEC defense wise. LSU, Georgia, USCe, Florida and aTm lost a lot on the defensive side of the ball. Bama, of course, is in good shape to maintain or be better.

Really the question is whether someone can break Bama's streak.
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
30351 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:21 pm to
Alabama getting stripped of championships.
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Georgia


Wasn't that good at defense anyway

quote:

aTm


Even worse than Georgia at defense

quote:

LSU


quote:

Florida


Will just reload

quote:

USCe


Don't know enough about them

This post was edited on 7/1/13 at 8:35 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105447 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:25 pm to
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Don't know enough about them


They will have an all-world defensive line but they lost a ton at linebacker and safety.

Posted by Dubosed
Gulf Breeze
Member since Nov 2012
7064 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:32 pm to
Jaboo
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53957 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 6:45 pm to
The Mason-Dixon Fault causes the Southeast to sink into the sea.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

getting fricked over and not having a team in the game in the first place?


You homers think there's a chance in hell the SEC is ever "fvcked over and doesn't have a team"?

It'll never happen until the streak ends. Until then the SEC will be givent he benefit of the doubt each year, as they should.
Posted by 10888bge
H-Town
Member since Aug 2011
8421 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 7:15 pm to
Godzilla/Mothra tag team.
Posted by Vanilla Coke
Member since Jan 2013
1343 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 8:32 pm to
0% chance SEC champ does not make the 4 team playoff in any given season, so we will have to be beaten.
This post was edited on 7/1/13 at 8:33 pm
Posted by Gardevoir
Member since Jun 2013
1880 posts
Posted on 7/1/13 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Stanford, Oregon and tOSU. For what it's worth, Oregon will have some serious depth this year a la the 2010 team but with guys in the trenches that the predecessor was missing. Stanford has gotten their front 7 talent from the SEC and the 2011 oline haul was the best that any team has ever gotten.

BobAg and you bring up excellent points.
I don't see Ohio State or Oregon as serious threats to the SEC in the title game. Stanford may be getting closer, but I don't think they beat Alabama, Texas A&M, or Georgia at the end of last season. I think it might take an SEC-like team to defeat the SEC in the title game. Stanford is the closest thing to that in the country.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 1:09 pm to
There is no one in the SEC that Oregon can't go toe to toe with, especially aTm and Georgia. Bama is the cream of the SEC right now.
Posted by Scoreboard
Madison, AL
Member since Apr 2012
2011 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 2:21 pm to
Cheating cheaters like Pope Urban Meyer
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24975 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

I don't see Ohio State or Oregon as serious threats to the SEC in the title game. Stanford may be getting closer, but I don't think they beat Alabama, Texas A&M, or Georgia at the end of last season. I think it might take an SEC-like team to defeat the SEC in the title game. Stanford is the closest thing to that in the country.


I see it the other way. I think it's going to take a team like Oregon to beat the SEC (of course who knows what they are going to be like post-Kelly). I think when you don't have as good of athletes, you are better off being a little unorthodox, rather than trying to matchup styles and going toe to toe.

I do not think a team an "SEC-like" team, like Stanford, is going to get it done. That is kind of what Notre Dame was trying to do last year and it was embarassing. When you are outmatched athletically / physically, like most non-SEC teams will be, I think you are better off trying to keep the SEC team off balance, throw something different at them, like an Oregon style team could possibly do.

Moreover, it's becoming harder to say what an "SEC-like" team really is as there is a quite a bit of diversity of styles in the SEC now.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

getting fricked over and not having a team in the game in the first place?


Damn near happened last year.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 4:12 pm to
I am interested to see how Tennessee compares Oregon athletically to the other teams in the SEC. We have gotten a massive upgrade athletically in the trenches since the 2010 team.
Posted by Gardevoir
Member since Jun 2013
1880 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

I see it the other way. I think it's going to take a team like Oregon to beat the SEC (of course who knows what they are going to be like post-Kelly). I think when you don't have as good of athletes, you are better off being a little unorthodox, rather than trying to matchup styles and going toe to toe.

I do not think a team an "SEC-like" team, like Stanford, is going to get it done. That is kind of what Notre Dame was trying to do last year and it was embarassing. When you are outmatched athletically / physically, like most non-SEC teams will be, I think you are better off trying to keep the SEC team off balance, throw something different at them, like an Oregon style team could possibly do.

Moreover, it's becoming harder to say what an "SEC-like" team really is as there is a quite a bit of diversity of styles in the SEC now.



I can see that. No disrespect to Oregon, but I don't think their offense would be able to hang against the SEC's best defenses. We saw what happened in 2011. We saw what happened against Stanford last year, though both teams left points on the field. I believe Florida had the SEC's best defense last season, and we know that LSU fares well against the spread and hurry up no huddle offenses. However, Oregon could probably keep it close since LSU and Florida were one-dimensional in most games last season.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 7/2/13 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

However, Oregon could probably keep it close since LSU and Florida were one-dimensional in most games last season.


Oregon keeps on getting more talented on the defensive side of the ball. Next year the team will take another step forward. I've never seen this kind of depth at Oregon, especially on the defensive line. Likewise, the secondary is truly an embarrassment of riches. After getting laughed off the board saying that Jordan was Mingo's equivalent, I don't expect a lot of agreement on my assertion. Time will tell. It's not just the offense.



This post was edited on 7/2/13 at 11:38 pm
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57942 posts
Posted on 7/3/13 at 3:26 am to
The world ending.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter