Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:10 pm to Old Sarge
Just choke the shite out of them. It's always nice to have a cream puff around.
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:12 pm to Old Sarge
Yes 
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:12 pm to Old Sarge
Yes
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:13 pm to Old Sarge
[voting twice] yes.
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:13 pm to Old Sarge
yes
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:14 pm to Old Sarge
Nah.... I'd rather see them crippled to the point where they get mercy kneed by Mizzou.
I feel like I may get my wish.
I feel like I may get my wish.
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:17 pm to Old Sarge
Maybe a truncated version?
SMU received the following punishment; bolded text are my suggestions for Ole Miss:
- The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills (without pads) were permitted until the spring of 1988 [no complete season cancellation for OM]
- All home games in 1988 were canceled. The NCAA allowed SMU to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected and so that SMU could avoid uninsurable default liabilities to those schools if its failure to uphold the contractual obligation to appear for competition was not beyond the school's control. The university ultimately chose to cancel the away games as well, and to accept the uninsured "failure to appear" liability. [Rather than the above mentioned "cancelled season," this home game cancellations option seems appropriate
- The team's existing probation was extended to 1990, resulting in essentially two full years of lost appearance, broadcast media, and advertising sponsorship income. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989. OM should receive a 2-year TV and bowl ban]
- SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years. [i don't know what would be appropriate in terms of number of scholarships lost, but that's a no-brained in this case]
- The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year.
SMU received the following punishment; bolded text are my suggestions for Ole Miss:
- The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills (without pads) were permitted until the spring of 1988 [no complete season cancellation for OM]
- All home games in 1988 were canceled. The NCAA allowed SMU to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected and so that SMU could avoid uninsurable default liabilities to those schools if its failure to uphold the contractual obligation to appear for competition was not beyond the school's control. The university ultimately chose to cancel the away games as well, and to accept the uninsured "failure to appear" liability. [Rather than the above mentioned "cancelled season," this home game cancellations option seems appropriate
- The team's existing probation was extended to 1990, resulting in essentially two full years of lost appearance, broadcast media, and advertising sponsorship income. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989. OM should receive a 2-year TV and bowl ban]
- SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years. [i don't know what would be appropriate in terms of number of scholarships lost, but that's a no-brained in this case]
- The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year.
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:17 pm to Old Sarge
Maybe a truncated version?
SMU received the following punishment; bolded text would be my suggestions for Ole Miss:
- The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills (without pads) were permitted until the spring of 1988 [I would not be for a complete season cancellation for OM]
- All home games in 1988 were canceled. The NCAA allowed SMU to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected and so that SMU could avoid uninsurable default liabilities to those schools if its failure to uphold the contractual obligation to appear for competition was not beyond the school's control. The university ultimately chose to cancel the away games as well, and to accept the uninsured "failure to appear" liability. [Rather than the above mentioned "cancelled season," one year of 'home game cancellations' seems appropriate for Ole Miss]
- The team's existing probation was extended to 1990, resulting in essentially two full years of lost appearance, broadcast media, and advertising sponsorship income. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989. [OM would receive a 2-year TV and bowl ban]
- SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years. [i don't know what's appropriate in terms of number of scholarships lost for Ole Miss, but it's safe to say they'll lose a few]
- The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine. [I'd be all for this in the Ole Miss case]
- No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year. [one year - same for Ole Miss]
SMU received the following punishment; bolded text would be my suggestions for Ole Miss:
- The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills (without pads) were permitted until the spring of 1988 [I would not be for a complete season cancellation for OM]
- All home games in 1988 were canceled. The NCAA allowed SMU to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected and so that SMU could avoid uninsurable default liabilities to those schools if its failure to uphold the contractual obligation to appear for competition was not beyond the school's control. The university ultimately chose to cancel the away games as well, and to accept the uninsured "failure to appear" liability. [Rather than the above mentioned "cancelled season," one year of 'home game cancellations' seems appropriate for Ole Miss]
- The team's existing probation was extended to 1990, resulting in essentially two full years of lost appearance, broadcast media, and advertising sponsorship income. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989. [OM would receive a 2-year TV and bowl ban]
- SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years. [i don't know what's appropriate in terms of number of scholarships lost for Ole Miss, but it's safe to say they'll lose a few]
- The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine. [I'd be all for this in the Ole Miss case]
- No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year. [one year - same for Ole Miss]
This post was edited on 6/12/17 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:19 pm to Old Sarge
No
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:20 pm to Old Sarge
Yes
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:30 pm to chitiger91
YES x 100..........
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:30 pm to chitiger91
it would set a NEW tone for cheaters.........
This post was edited on 6/12/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 6/12/17 at 7:35 pm to Old Sarge
No
This shouldn't even be a question
This shouldn't even be a question
This post was edited on 6/12/17 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 6/12/17 at 8:09 pm to Old Sarge
No i would not wish that on any fanbase. Just whip their arse a little
Posted on 6/12/17 at 8:12 pm to BranchDawg
Who cares
Posted on 6/12/17 at 8:21 pm to Old Sarge
I agree. The SEC schools voted 6-4 to strip Florida of its 1984 SEC title. So let's vote on punishing Ole Miss.
And since Ole Miss voted to strip our title, they can GO TO NCAA HELL!
And since Ole Miss voted to strip our title, they can GO TO NCAA HELL!
Posted on 6/12/17 at 8:40 pm to TDFreak
Nah. Just their fans.
Posted on 6/12/17 at 8:55 pm to ibleedpurpleandgold.
quote:
Yes however, Bama is doing FAR more than Ole Piss has!
Give us some examples.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 5:54 am to Old Sarge
No.....I mean yes.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News