Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/21/08 at 9:24 pm to Ross
quote:
ANYONE that said that the USC-AU game would have a 40 point difference either way is just plain DUMB!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just saying the logic behind "its possible" is not good logic. I'm not saying Auburn would have beaten USC by 40+.
I get what you are saying, but there is one important fact you and PJ are over looking. USC DID beat an undefeated, BCS conference champion 55-19, Auburn did not. To say "anything" could happen has to have some basis in reality. There is no way, any college team could have beaten that USC team by 40, sorry.
USC fans using the 02 and 03 games as "proof" they would have beaten AU in 04 is stupid too, but there is absolutely no way Auburn could have beat USC by as lopsided a score as USC beat OU.
Posted on 7/21/08 at 9:54 pm to H-Town Tiger
I have to agree. And while it was evident when the season was over that Auburn should have been in the national title game, there was no reason at the time to think that USC and OU, being undefeated, were not the two best teams.
Posted on 7/21/08 at 9:58 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
USC fans using the 02 and 03 games as "proof" they would have beaten AU in 04 is stupid too,
I did not see anyone say that. If you are referring to me, I said something to the effect that AU had just about enough.
Edit: I am pretty sure AU had just about enough of USC by that time (i.e., getting manhandled in two consecutive seasons with one being a shut out at Jordan-Hare)
This post was edited on 7/21/08 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 7/22/08 at 7:49 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Edit: I am pretty sure AU had just about enough of USC by that time (i.e., getting manhandled in two consecutive seasons with one being a shut out at Jordan-Hare)
The 2002 game was a really close game...Posted on 7/22/08 at 8:36 am to Ross
quote:
The 2002 game was a really close game...
I would not call it really close- it was 7 points
Posted on 7/22/08 at 9:35 am to LSUTANGERINE
Yeah I agree that 7 pt. loss by USC to the Ducks was a blowout...
Posted on 7/22/08 at 10:53 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I did not see anyone say that. If you are referring to me,
I was ot directing it at you or anyone, just a general comment I've heard before
Posted on 7/22/08 at 10:55 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I would not call it really close- it was 7 points
How the frick is 7 points getting manhandeled?
Posted on 7/22/08 at 11:26 pm to Ross
Posted on 7/23/08 at 7:22 am to Binx
quote:
like this argument here about the USC LSU debate.
Halftime Both the USC bands and LSU bands perform.
Posted on 7/23/08 at 8:26 am to Chimlim
USC was the best team in:
03
04
05
Two titles to show for it.
Not bad.
LSU got lucky in '07 (all title teams need luck don't they) and they split one in '03.
03
04
05
Two titles to show for it.
Not bad.
LSU got lucky in '07 (all title teams need luck don't they) and they split one in '03.
Posted on 7/23/08 at 8:45 am to Ross
quote:
How the frick is 7 points getting manhandeled?
and outgained 386-281
Posted on 7/23/08 at 8:52 am to StrongSafety
quote:
USC was the best team in:
04
One title. More rational.[quote]
LSU got lucky in '07
How ? Are you saying Kansas should have been #1 since they only had one loss ?
Posted on 7/23/08 at 8:58 am to I-59 Tiger
WVU choking, MU choking.
Definitely the weakest BCS title team of the decade
Definitely the weakest BCS title team of the decade
Posted on 7/23/08 at 9:00 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Definitely the weakest BCS title team of the decade
Wrong again.
Posted on 7/23/08 at 9:02 am to StrongSafety
quote:
USC was the best team in:
03
04
05
Best team means nothing.
Championship mean something
2003 - LSU
2004 - USC
2005 - Texas
2006 - Florida
2007 - LSU
quote:
Two titles to show for it.
What two titles?
quote:
and they split one in '03.
I do believe we have 2 crystal trophies
Also, how dare you claim to be the best team in 2005. When y'all had a chance to win the BCSNCG and LOST to Texas. Didn't the best team win that game?
Posted on 7/23/08 at 9:16 am to Enigma
Best teams don't always win. Anyone that had played football or a team sport knows this for a fact
And USC's '03 championship is legit stop kidding your damn self. The only place it is not legit in is louisiana.
And USC's '03 championship is legit stop kidding your damn self. The only place it is not legit in is louisiana.
Posted on 7/23/08 at 9:19 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Best teams don't always win. Anyone that had played football or a team sport knows this for a fact
So you're saying Auburn should have been National Champion in 2004 instead of Southern Cal ?
Posted on 7/23/08 at 9:24 am to I-59 Tiger
AU doesn't even has an argument. Just because u make it out of the SEC does not mean you are one of the two best teams in america.
Contrary to SEC homers ideologies and beliefs, the two best teams can be from other conferences
Contrary to SEC homers ideologies and beliefs, the two best teams can be from other conferences
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News