Started By
Message
Update on former Florida QB Jalen Kitna and his child porn charges…
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:07 pm
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 3:07 pm
10
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:09 pm to finchmeister08
I hope the dad of one of those kids shoots him in the face. He should be raped in prison everyday if he is allowed to breathe on this earth.
ETA: love the downvotes for thinking people who distribute child porn should be shot
ETA: love the downvotes for thinking people who distribute child porn should be shot
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:10 pm to finchmeister08
Why plea bargain this? Dude needs time behind bars, not time served and probation.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:11 pm to BRbornandraised
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:18 pm to BRbornandraised
From reading the article it sounds pretty likely that this was more along the lines of sharing snapchat type stuff. I don't think he gets this plea if it's what most of us think when we hear "child porn" and the article seems to subtly imply that too.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:19 pm to finchmeister08
He plea bargained down to breach of peace. I have no idea why the prosecutor would do this. Anyone who distributes child porn should be put 6 feet under. IDC the circumstances.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:19 pm to Jake88
Must be nice to have a famous father and a bunch of cash
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:22 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
From reading the article it sounds pretty likely that this was more along the lines of sharing snapchat type stuff. I don't think he gets this plea if it's what most of us think when we hear "child porn" and the article seems to subtly imply that too.
This.
Snapchat in HS with freshman girls would probably violate laws.
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:24 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
From reading the article it sounds pretty likely that this was more along the lines of sharing snapchat type stuff.
From the ESPN article today: “shared two images of young girls being sexually abused”
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:24 pm to tide06
Go back and read the story
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:26 pm to sheeeeeit
quote:
From the ESPN article today: “shared two images of young girls being sexually abused”
Apparently some people on this site believe child porn isn't a big deal if its a 17 year old and they guranteed me that he would be doing time if it were as heinous as I was thinking. Glad some people like to blur the lines here amiright. Hope this shuts up the pedo apologists
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:29 pm to Tigerpride18
I thought I remember it being prepubescent sexual assault pictures
If not , I know it implied they were young enough to be obviously illegal. That’s not the case with a 17 year old. It would be impossible to tell for sure if they were 17 or 18 without research. I’m pretty sure they were real young
If not , I know it implied they were young enough to be obviously illegal. That’s not the case with a 17 year old. It would be impossible to tell for sure if they were 17 or 18 without research. I’m pretty sure they were real young
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:30 pm to BRbornandraised
No DA who likes to keep their job is bending over backwards to go lenient on a child porn defendant. Clearly the circumstances of the case led to this outcome.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:31 pm to Jake88
quote:Florida law is lacking.
Why plea bargain this? Dude needs time behind bars, not time served and probation
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:37 pm to Tigerpride18
I'm basing it on the Orlando Sentinel article saying his defense was thinking they were of age and that the other two images found could have been "problematic" (or similar soft language like that). Plus the judge's comments of "go out and do great things in the world now." It all just sounded rather unlikely, even for a single incident of sharing real child porn.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:39 pm to BRbornandraised
quote:
Apparently some people on this site believe child porn isn't a big deal if its a 17 year old
You may well be right about the circumstances, but any reasonable society draws a pretty stark line between a teenage selfies and prepubescent children. One is immoral dirtbag territory and one is a contingent of mentally ill people who very commonly act on overwhelmingly evil impulses.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 4:00 pm to finchmeister08
He shared two images known to be child porn (how he was caught) and had three more on his phone.
Dude is lucky the DA and /or Feds decided to go soft on him.
The absolute win in that charge is it isn’t a felony and he doesn’t go on predator list.
Dude is lucky the DA and /or Feds decided to go soft on him.
The absolute win in that charge is it isn’t a felony and he doesn’t go on predator list.
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 7/5/23 at 4:33 pm to finchmeister08
The article said he posted two pictures on Discord. Does anyone know what the images were of? If it's just some high school nudity then he got a fair charge. If it was some kid under 10 being abused then they should have given him a bigger charge.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 4:35 pm to finchmeister08
Setting pedos free is always a good idea …
Posted on 7/5/23 at 4:35 pm to RealDawg
quote:
The absolute win in that charge is it isn’t a felony and he doesn’t go on predator list.
He just now has name linked to the words child pr0n anytime you search his name online, so that's basically being on the predator list when it comes to finding a job.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News