Started By
Message

re: UNC receives 2nd NOA

Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:20 am to
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:20 am to
You linking something from 2013 when the basis of a second letter is that a new investigation is brewing is the most Big4Dawg post there could be
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:21 am to
Cheater McCheatface
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:22 am to
This is the same guy that says Bjork lied about the investigation. He then had to cut a sentence in half to try and be right. Facts don't matter to him.
Posted by Big4Dawg
Member since May 2013
1058 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:24 am to
David Johnson reported it - feel free to go find it yourself.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:27 am to
You've already said that in a two page thread. And I've already responded. You drunk?
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Why has it been a year since the 1st NOA was received and no punishment handed down yet?





For the same reasons I have stated over in over. UNC found more things and reported them. That halted the punishment.

Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Till we see what is in the Saunders stuff I don't know.


Or maybe the Tx coach...


Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Big4Dawg


Hugh Freeze still got you melting!
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:39 pm to
Then why haven't they started over Ole Miss. If they really had new infractions then they would follow their established process unless you can show where they states they are changing since they halted UNCa past NOA?
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:41 pm to
Not just the punishment but the whole NOA process. You stated the NCAA has new stuff on Ole Miss but we are still in the NOA process.
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:42 pm to
Name the coach if you know he will be named any way.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3320 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:49 pm to
Isn't he talking about Vaughn? At least, that's what I've heard. No one will know until the end.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17448 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Of course this would be started by an ED fan


Fixed that for you. Those whackadoodles come over here, create accounts, spew what ever crap their grand master has thought up on ED. Then they go back to ED and congratulate themselves about how they razed then Bears.....
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:59 pm to
Ok that would make since thought it was more a reference to the super secrete investigation. We will see but not sure how bad it will be with no FTM or no LOIC.
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Then why haven't they started over Ole Miss.


What does Ole Miss have to do with UNC? Do you think the NCAA has a template that all cases are molded by?

Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Name the coach if you know he will be named any way.


Has already been named.


Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:08 pm to
Yeah I think they have a pretty well establish way they run investigations and a lot of defined rules for it. If your saying that they are running a investigation totally different then any way they have before with no other reason or prop of why other then you need it to be true that's called making stuff up.

Bjork has been honest about the investigation the whole time unless you can prove otherwise and he stated its over. Then you say it's not because they are running a investigation totally different then they ever have unless you can prove different for no reason.
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:13 pm to
Yeah realized that and his response will be interesting as well. Doubt Saunders even responds.
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:24 pm to
If you have some high level of experience involved in NCAA multiple investigation that you are basing it off of ok lay it out there. If it's you just guessing with nothing to back it up its just you making stuff up to fit the agenda you have had from the start. I base my opinion and stance off of proven examples of current history because I'm not a person with deep extended experience in the inter workings of a NCAA investigation so if you are ok that's different.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30193 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Name the coach if you know he will be named any way.


When was Chris Vaughn questioned by the NCAA? Before or after OleMiss received their NCAA letter? And what was so bad that Charlie Strong felt like he had to fire the guy?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter