Started By
Message
re: UNC is looking better and better to add to the SEC
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Yeah, can't we just kick Mizzou out?
1
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:44 pm to CNB
quote:
We would finally have a true conference rival
see winners all around.
i would actually want to watch that game. screw the forced whatever it is they've set you guys up with A&M
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:46 pm to hawgfaninc
Our new "rivalry" with Mizzou is the "Battle Of the Columbias" 
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:49 pm to CNB
Better than the battle of the walmart greeters. Both school's should lobby the waltons to put up some cash for the winner of the game. Say $1 million to the endowment of the school that wins the walmart game each year. Pocket change for them and the ceo could present the check to the winning team with trophy.
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:50 pm to CNB
quote:
"Battle Of the Columbias"
just turrible
Posted on 6/11/13 at 2:59 pm to CNB
quote:
You're probably the best thing the SEC got from Mizzou
Well aren't you sweet?
quote:
/hardleg
:sogettinglaidtonitebro:
Posted on 6/11/13 at 3:09 pm to LSUTIGERS8181
quote:
I still really don't understand why the SEC even thought to bring in mizzou.
at this point if you don't understand why Mizzou is in the SEC you are being willfully ignorant.
Posted on 6/11/13 at 3:27 pm to Dr RC
Ugh. No. Under no circumstances do you want UNC in the SEC. You people call Missouri yankees? UNC would revel in such terminology. UNC makes U-Texas look humble.
If you have to bring in an NC school, NC State is the best cultural fit, by far.
If you have to bring in an NC school, NC State is the best cultural fit, by far.
Posted on 6/11/13 at 3:37 pm to LSUTIGERS8181
quote:
I still really don't understand why the SEC even thought to bring in mizzou.
Big TV markets in St. Louis and Kansas City.
Posted on 6/11/13 at 3:38 pm to LSUTIGERS8181
quote:
I still really don't understand why the SEC even thought to bring in mizzou.
I wouldn't expect you to. The people in charge of the decision are much smarter than you.
Posted on 6/11/13 at 3:39 pm to Mizzeaux
quote:
Mizzeaux
Yeah, can't we just kick Mizzou out?
Funny by itself but doing it in the voice of your avatar
Posted on 6/12/13 at 7:07 pm to Cheese Grits
Missouri is in the SEC because we really needed another team and they were lucky to get in.
No offense but based on population trends Missouri was a very poor alternative to the schools in North Carolina or Virginia.
The SEC would benefit from another east coast team. Except for Texas, FLorida, and Georgia the SEC states are showing very little population growth.
No offense but based on population trends Missouri was a very poor alternative to the schools in North Carolina or Virginia.
The SEC would benefit from another east coast team. Except for Texas, FLorida, and Georgia the SEC states are showing very little population growth.
This post was edited on 6/12/13 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 6/12/13 at 7:56 pm to Maroon Flash
The SEC was very lucky to get Mizzou, IMO. The academics wanted a good academic school which mizzou is, the bean couters wanted a state school in which that school was the big dog in state. So, Mizzou, while not a perfect for the fans as some might say was very good for the SEC and Mizzou. They will grow into their role in the SEC, just like arkie and USCe. Both are up and down right now but both have put a good product on the field and have won titles in other sports other than football which have made the SEC look good. I welcome Mizzou with open arms and good luck in the future. It will take a little time.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 8:52 pm to bamalee
No offense, but Mizzou is a state with almost zero growth and will NEVER be much more than they are now.
By contrast Virginia has a population of 2.2 million more than Mizzou and the population is growing 6x faster than Mizzou.
North Carolina has a population of 3.7 million more than Mizzou and the population is growing 13 x faster.
Schools in NC and Va WILL become a lot more relevant in the future and the SEC would have done much better getting a school from one of those states.
By contrast Virginia has a population of 2.2 million more than Mizzou and the population is growing 6x faster than Mizzou.
North Carolina has a population of 3.7 million more than Mizzou and the population is growing 13 x faster.
Schools in NC and Va WILL become a lot more relevant in the future and the SEC would have done much better getting a school from one of those states.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 9:45 pm to hawgfaninc
To think this could have or ever will is absolutely retarded. I have no clue why this gets brought up every day with people saying the same shite.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 9:55 pm to RoyalAir
Your response says it all. UNC would be our hated rivals..nc state is weak and who gives a shite about them
Posted on 6/12/13 at 10:01 pm to hawgfaninc
We need to get to 16. 14 makes for a shitty divisional set up imho.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 10:07 pm to hawgfaninc
UNC and Duke
Take Mizzou back West
I like it
Take Mizzou back West
I like it
Posted on 6/12/13 at 10:09 pm to CockStrong
No NC State get Duke
Bring the Tobacco Road rivalry to the SEC
Bring the Tobacco Road rivalry to the SEC
Posted on 6/12/13 at 10:09 pm to attheua
quote:
We need to get to 16. 14 makes for a shitty divisional set up imho.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Missouri stays. We just need to look towards expanding SEC 3.0
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News