Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:53 pm to Legend13
Typical bammer douchebag with zero self awareness talking about somebody needing luck when his own team including his messiah and savior could very well have zero national chamionships in recent years without a whole string of luck. Speaking of luck, you can alert me when Auburn backs into the national championship game without even winning their own division of the SEC
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:53 pm to Tigers247
quote:
This isn't a dick measuring contest...... UGA you always think your just amazing because we all know you want that championship sooooooo bad...... Your overrated for beating a depleted team that was ranked for previous teams success
You are a fricking POS troll and embarrassing to most normal Auburn fans. You started this topic with a question...then bitched that no one answered, then I give an answer and you call it a "dick measuring" contest....you fricking trailer trash, stealing internet from the school of agriculture building, need to go back to fricking cows for a good time instead of coming here
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:56 pm to Legend13
Ok "brah" I literally just said that Clemson was only ranked because of last years success..... So wouldn't that mean I don't think teams should be based off past years.... Plus I never said anything about last years team besides they have earned their ranking.... Because we return a lot of guys.... And I like auburn 
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:57 pm to auburnphan23
quote:At least when Bama gets to the Natty......
you can alert me when Auburn backs into the national championship game without even winning their own division of the SEC
They win it.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:58 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:Who gives a frick? Numerous posters on this board stated before the game that Arkansas offense would literally run all over Auburn, yet Auburn held them to zero points and only 55 yards of total offense in the 2nd half
Georgia's defense only allowed 15 total second half yards
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:59 pm to Tigers247
quote:
Ok "brah" I literally just said that Clemson was only ranked because of last years success..... So wouldn't that mean I don't think teams should be based off past years....
So Auburn loses their best 2 players and gets ranked in the top 10, but you have no problem with that??
fricking troll. Get your dick out of the goat before the grad students in the agriculture school see you
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:59 pm to Tigers247
quote:
To UGA fans not PeaRidge
Yeah whatever, your thread wasn't asked to Dawg fans and your obviously a very sensitive boy. How did y'all earn your ranking? Based on your two loss 2013 season that included beating the team your trying to under value on a fluke? I guess being raised as a the little sister to Bama has affected you emotionally. Your QB is a Georgia reject for crying out loud. Is that why y'all have that cheer about it "being great to be an Auburn Tiger?"... To convince yourselves that it's true? Traditionally shitty athletic programs with the occasional good year in football, albeit not built from within, but bought. Except diving. Y'all have an excellent diving program.
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:05 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
You are such a moron. Auburn did a hell of a lot more than LSU did in 2013 and winning a SEC championship with a Georgia reject is better than taking a Georgia reject like Mettenberger and still not winning shite.
Oh yeah, Auburn only occasionally has a good year, yet we have won the western division more recently than the corndogs, won the SEC championships more recently than the corndogs, won national championship more recently than the corndogs, and played for a national championship more recently than the corndogs. LSU has won the western division 1 fricking time since 2008. Deal with it!
Oh yeah, Auburn only occasionally has a good year, yet we have won the western division more recently than the corndogs, won the SEC championships more recently than the corndogs, won national championship more recently than the corndogs, and played for a national championship more recently than the corndogs. LSU has won the western division 1 fricking time since 2008. Deal with it!
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:10 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
You are such a moron. Auburn did a hell of a lot more than LSU did in 2013 and winning a SEC championship with a Georgia reject is better than taking a Georgia reject like Mettenberger and still not winning shite
Awwww, do you need a lily pad to tinkle on? Your program is a joke. 2010 was a joke. Last year was a great season, but insanely fortunate. Y'all dominated very few on your schedule and broke the sec's streak. And Mettenberger beat you. By two TD's. Keep saying how great it is to be an Auburn Tiger. One day we will all be convinced.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:15 pm to Tigers247
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:25 pm to IT_Dawg
Good one?....
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:27 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
Isn't mettenberger a Georgia reject?
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:30 pm to IT_Dawg
Yea I'm such a troll..... U got me I asked a question thinking I could get some insight because I missed some of the game and then all the dawgs start talking shite about how auburn could barely beat Arkansas when it wasn't relevant to what I said ...... Don't get your panties in a wad it was a question and only a couple answered
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:43 pm to Legend13
quote:
UGA would've beaten anybody in the SEC by 10 to 14 yesterday.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:45 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
So Auburn loses their best 2 players and gets ranked in the top 10, but you have no problem with that??
We did lose Marshall, but only for a half.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:49 pm to Tigers247
quote:
Yea I'm such a troll..... U got me I asked a question thinking I could get some insight because I missed some of the game and then all the dawgs start talking shite about how auburn could barely beat Arkansas when it wasn't relevant to what I said ...... Don't get your panties in a wad it was a question and only a couple answered
Yes, you are a goat fricking troll. You asked a question, bitches like a girl that no one answered the OP. I answered it....you then said I was making it a dick measuring contest...... The word troll gets over used (along with many others), but you are the definition of a troll in this thread
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 11:50 pm
Posted on 9/1/14 at 12:01 am to PeaRidgeWatash
quote:
broke the sec's streak.
Oh? And why wasn't LSU there to defend the streak?
Posted on 9/1/14 at 12:07 am to IT_Dawg
I bitch because I asked a simple fricking question and then ironically your the once being sensitive saying how auburn barely beat Arkansas and by u I mean UGA fans.... Your the ones being sensitive over reacting to what I thought was a premature prediction of your football team
Posted on 9/1/14 at 12:41 am to Tigers247
quote:
Don't understand the hype..... You beat a Clemson team that has lost a lot ???? Someone please explain to me the hype of this team ?
You can look at the stats, although it is only week 1, and see some things. But what do you know until a couple of weeks in anyways? UGA fans are prone to overreacting pre-season and win or lose in season. Same thing happened last year despite the Clemson loss but after beating USC.
__________
quote:
First, UGA score: Tied at half 21-21. End of 3rd 24-21. End of 4th 45-21.
Of all of the SEC teams that won, all of them had > TD lead going into the 4th except Ole Miss (1pt) and UGA (3pt). Is that because Clemson was tougher? We shall see.
SEC Stats:
Scoring. T4th in the SEC with Auburn. UK #1, A&M #2, #3 MSU, #8 Bama, T#9 LSU and USCe.
Rushing. UGA #1 328, Auburn #2 302, Bama #3 288.
Passing Yards. Ready for this stat? UGA #12 out of 13. #9 out of SEC in Attempts, UGA threw 38% of the time which was 4th. LSU, Auburn and MO threw less as a % of total plays but all had more yards.
Offense Yards: UGA #6 at 459. #1 A&M 680, #2 UK 656, #3 Auburn 595, #4 MSU 550, #5 Bama 538.... LSU #10 365.
Scoring Defense: UGA T#5 with Auburn.
Rushing and Passing Def: #4 rushing (avg 2013 #6 SEC), #3 passing (avg 2013 #9 SEC)
Total Defense: UGA #2 291, MSU #1 283, LSU #3 318, Auburn #4 328, Vandy #5..., Bama #7.
Red Zone Scoring: UGA #9 3-5. Auburn/Uk/Bama #1 4-4, Ark 3-3, USC 2-2, LSU 1-1.... A&M 8-9. <- Damn.
Def Red Zone: T#2 with UK 2-3. MSU and Ole Miss T#1.
3rd Down Conversions: A&M 71%, Auburn 64%, Bama 56%, Georgia T#6 38%, LSU 35%.
3rd Down Defense: #1 Vandy 2-17, #2 Auburn 2-11, #3 A&M 2-9, LSU #5 4-15, UGA T#7 7-21, #10 Alabama.
____________________________
The real takeaway is that nobody looked better than A&M from start to finish, well at least on offense, everyones defense TBD. Several winning SEC teams looked better in their 2nd half than 1st. UGA looked better in the 4th then they did in the first 3 quarters but the hype is on the 4th.
As to UGA alone, when Gurley does go down, can the passing attack save them? If the passing attack doesn't, how well does the defense hold up? We won't know this for two weeks...
or more. This post was edited on 9/1/14 at 1:08 am
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News