Started By
Message

re: TJ Moe speaks obvious truth about CFB unionizing

Posted on 3/27/14 at 2:16 pm to
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 2:16 pm to
Right now coaches make 10-30 times what presidents do, highly prized recruits are suddenly driving $60,000 cars, and their impoverished parents suddenly have new houses. Nobody worries about this, so I have a hard time worrying about whether the players unionize.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Right now coaches make 10-30 times what presidents do, highly prized recruits are suddenly driving $60,000 cars, and their impoverished parents suddenly have new houses. Nobody worries about this, so I have a hard time worrying about whether the players unionize.


Exactly. The whole system is a sham, but the product delivered every Saturday in the fall is too good to ignore.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19347 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 2:25 pm to
Moe is one of the very few to bring up the fact that as employees, players will be required to pay both state & Federal income taxes on this income they claim they are receiving. And any injury "on the job" would now be covered by WC laws. Can you imagine the fraud that would come into play with a 3rd string guard, not playing, getting hurt & then dragging out his comp claim as real employees are now known to do? Who pays the union dues necessary to keep the union running?
Posted by msuman2
Member since Jul 2010
1535 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:06 pm to
Don't like the unionizing.

Should college athletes be paid? Yes

All you have to pay them is minimum wage or do them like Graduate assistants.
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19084 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

And how about Title IX? major lawsuits would follow if football and mens basketball (The only real revenue sports) began getting paid




Posted by Mohican
Member since Nov 2012
6179 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:20 pm to
These kids think they have all this leverage. I'm not sure where they get it.

When Ryan Perrilloux was at LSU he was going to be the next big thing. When he transferred to Jacksonville State he was forgotten.

There are tens of thousands of kids waiting to fill the spots of the other athletes. What they aren't considering is that much of their value comes from school loyalty.

It truly is a very complex issue. But if they want to unionize they should forego college altogether and join the CFL or some other league.

They wouldn't get half the publicity they get with the current setup.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:24 pm to
Not really, still a LONG appeals process in all of this and I'm afraid if any players do unionize they won't like the result.

Give them some stipend and be done with it.
Posted by NC1406
Member since Jul 2013
659 posts
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:27 pm to
I have not read all the threads on CFB unionizing. Has anyone mentioned that since the NLRB has ruled the football players are employes and therefore eligible to unionize, this means they are employees for all other areas as well.

If an employee is given benefits (non cash) they must file these benefits with the IRS as income. Are the fine upstanding young men of Northwestern going to need to file the cost of their scholly as income? I would think so.
Posted by outlawjoseywales
Memphis, TN
Member since Sep 2012
1836 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:40 am to
The players in all sports should get some spending money. How much is never going to be correct. You cannot give them too much, as TJ states it will get taxed, and too little is a slap in the face.
Posted by nb200016
Atlanta, GA
Member since Mar 2014
1282 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:36 am to
quote:

I hated TJ Moe as a player, especially when Missouri benefitted from a blatant block in the back on a long TD reception for him to beat San Diego State in the final minute in 2010, but I agree with him here until he goes on about the endorsements and such.

Opposed to endorsements because it would create a lot of bidding wars for high school athletes.

"Come to Oregon Mr. 5 star recruit, and you will get your own Nike shoe line and a giant ad on a billboard in Times Square the moment you sign your LOI"

Not sure if we want that.




No I'm sure we definitely don't want that.
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

I hated TJ Moe as a player, especially when Missouri benefitted from a blatant block in the back on a long TD reception for him to beat San Diego State in the final minute in 2010,


HERE is the play...."blatant BIB"? Get a fricking clue.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44041 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:53 am to
nm
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 11:58 am
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 7:32 am to
Northwestern tuition and fees is 60K a year, not to mention the perks they receive for free travel, lodging, and food while on the road. The IRS is probably salivating right now.

All the institution has to do is say fine. We will set you up as an employee(contractor) and count your travel perks as part of your salary. Since the agreement for them play at the university is via a contract(scholarship), they can be treated as contract employees hence the university can treat them as self-employed workers providing a service.

Wait until they get a tax bill at the end of the year for $60k. Not to mention that contract(scholarship) they sign with the university is for one year. It will give coaches even more leverage to process at the end of the year. Since they will now be treated like an employee and when not performing to standards said contract can be terminated without concern as student.

Now they can throw union all they want out there but lets remember all the right to work states including every SEC state where employees have that choice. And the at will states that an employer can fire at will and may eliminate employee from getting unemployment benefits. Not to mention all the states that allow an employer to require a non-compete contract stating that said employee leaves their current employer can not go and work for another employer doing the same job for lets say 3 years.

Another reason this country is in the shite because of unions and if this pushed through around the country CFB, especially the players will be screwed. I doubt this goes anywhere and hope it does not. There are far better ways to accomplish what s needs to be fixed in CFB than allowing a union to come in and flex muscle that really could care less about the athlete(employee but only concern is the money they will receive out of it. Sorry rant over.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10444 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:15 am to
quote:

If an employee is given benefits (non cash) they must file these benefits with the IRS as income. Are the fine upstanding young men of Northwestern going to need to file the cost of their scholly as income? I would think so.
I don't think so. Scholarships are already exempt from the federal income tax, and even if not qualified tuition payments are deductible.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:21 am to
I have no problem with players joining unions if they want to.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10444 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:25 am to
quote:

If the current players start getting paid /free market/ whatever they end up doing do y'all think that past players will try to receive money from video games that used their likeness before all of this talk has come about
They've already been doing that. EA settled with the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon lawsuit for like $40 million.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:29 am to
quote:

They've already been doing that. EA settled with the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon lawsuit for like $40 million.
And how much did each player make off that?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:35 am to
I agree 100% with Moe about the endorsements. I want the players to be able to make as much as they can from whoever they can while they can.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:44 am to
The world of college football is changing whether we like it or not. If you want to blame someone, blame ESPN. These kids have been wined, dined, and pampered by the likes of Herbstreit, Fowler, Corso, Howard, Andrews, Ponder, and many others over the years. They treat them like royalty while everyone makes money off of them at their expense. College football is now a multi-billion dollar industry and the players receive absolutely zilch. Did you actually think this could continue to go on as is without any type of protest?

Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 3/29/14 at 8:49 am to
Scholarships are non-taxed IIRC up to the limit of what is required to cover tuition and whatnot. Anything over that which most scholarships cover is taxable but the amount is usually insignificant. They will receive a 1099 and it will be reported as well to the IRS.

As an employee it all would taxable. The scholarship would no longer qualify as a deduction and hence the player would become a contract employee once they join the union and any compensation would be taxable not to mention they would also pay union dues as well.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter