re: The Tunsil issue

Haven't been on here in a bit. I just realized I was responding to an alter of the op.

Butterfly your shtick is old.

I thought the NCAA was a bit frustrated as Tunsil did not work with them as much when they were investigating pre-Draft issues? On the one hand I'm with Laremy as nothing positive can come personally through doing anything more than you already have.

However, Reggie Bush has been purged from the history of USC. Their Hall of Champions does not mention him. Not once. He hasn't been back to campus since returning his Heisman Trophy.

Couldn't the NCAA require the institution to disassociate the player from the program as a punitive measure for failing to cooperate with investigators or an investigation after you leave the institution due to declaring for the pro ranks or using your eligibility up?

I'm genuinely unsure how Tunsil feels about OM. But if they vacate and get punished at all because of violations relating to impermissible benefits provided to him, I could see that as a tool at the NCAA's disposal. The question is would that potential outcome coerce Tunsil?

For me it would but most fans have a much different sense of fealty towards their alma mater...

quote:

---

Yes highly. It's laughable you are invested into it as well.

---

Well, Time will tell wont it.

quote:

---

Since I'm on the phone quote form here sucks for myself l, but why is om launching an investigation? Hmmm maybe because there are accusations.

---

That won't work for your argument either. There is no accusation. Just what Tunsil said. Now if you are right, and you are not, then there is nothing to investigate because there is no accusation from anybody.

quote:

---

And by the look of the last stanza, yes, constantly. Your failure of debate and logic is "mind bottling".

---

Rashad McCants public out burst used in that investigation didn't they?

quote:

---

KTownRebel

---

Delete this.

quote:

---

Delete this.

---

I don't know how. Smdh

Op, you are a pansy

quote:

---

I'm still trying to figure out how Means, Fluker, Cam and the rest of the players Ole Miss fans keep bringing up are going to change anything.

---

quote:

---

Means

---

If they're using Albert Means' as the logic for why they'll get off easy... hate to break it to 'em...

quote:

---

DJ Fluker says high

---

I thought Fluker's deal was with a go-between for an agent, not university officials....oh, and it's "hi", not "high"...you fricking idiot.

quote:

---

To use anything Tunsil said or did, the NCAA has to personally interview him.

---

Really? They apparently have authenticated the text exchange. The NCAA can certainly ask the coaches what Tunsil said or did that they heard or saw. And that information about what he said or did can no doubt be used. I am no expert on NCAA procedure, but I would suspect that hearsay rules don't apply, or at least not with the same rigor as in a court. Even if hearsay rules apply, there are exceptions that would allow the use of what Tunsil said, in part because at that point it falls on Ole Miss to explain what it did or didn't do in response to those texts from Tunsil. The coaches may lie, but they had better hope there aren't more texts that can be retrieved from communications between Tunsil and the Ole Miss staff that would be damning. And they had better have a more plausible explanation than what has been offered by some on the Rant of what they understood Tunsil was asking for in the texts and how they responded.

The ncaa still needs tunsil under the umbrella to do anything with what's known and out there.


[/quote]

No they do not. They have a coach that's involved. Now if they fire the coach or he resigns, thus not involved with OM, it may be a problem. As of now, the coach and AD has to answer questions and give a valid explanation. That is a fact. They don't need Tunsil one bit. But if the coaches try to make it all out like Tunsil was a money grubbed, then he will speak volumes.