Started By
Message
re: The SEC's Big Ten
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:15 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:15 pm to Cheese Grits
Well then Ky failed all over the place this year
ETA and every year 13 teams are not relevant
ETA and every year 13 teams are not relevant
This post was edited on 5/15/14 at 1:17 pm
1
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:16 pm to LSUNV
all fanbases have fickle and/or retarded fans.
Exhibit A:
Exhibit A:
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:16 pm to LSUNV
quote:
You would still have a chance to play your "Rival" just not as often
Yeah, that's the problem. A November without UGA/AU isn't a real football season.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:16 pm to 870Hog
quote:
second place is not an option.
Football man
quote:
get to the Final Four in basketball
For most SEC teams getting to a Final Four is a start (baby steps in basketball)
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:16 pm to KCM0Tiger
If you go by winning percentages, then the first 4 of this said Big 10 would be:
1) LSU
2) UF
3) AU
4) AL
1) LSU
2) UF
3) AU
4) AL
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:16 pm to bbap
How the hell did you get that picture of my leg? 
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:17 pm to 870Hog
i stole it from clay travis. you know he loves the hogs.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:18 pm to 870Hog
He snapped it after sex when you weren't looking
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:19 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
Well then Ky failed all over the place this year
For UK fans, Runner Up and Final Fours are failure. Have to go all the way back to 2012 for UK success.
Let me know when Mizzou gets to the Final Four the first time before bringing that weak sauce.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:20 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Yeah, that's the problem. A November without UGA/AU isn't a real football season.
That is only for the benefit of two fan bases, imagine that if AU and UGA played each other on a national stage for the Championship. Everybody in the country would watch that. It would benefit the conference as a whole much more to have such Rivalry games on a bigger stage
One solution I liked was play your rival every other year. At least this way you have a chance every other year to watch two true rivals collide in the SEC game
This post was edited on 5/15/14 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:23 pm to LSUNV
quote:
That is only for the benefit of two fan bases
Not really. I'd feel the same way about a season with no LSU/bama, UF/UT, Auburn/bama, auburn/lsu, ole miss/msu, etc. Those games ARE the sec. Wouldn't feel right without em.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:23 pm to LSUNV
I don't care about playing Auburn on the big stage. It's tradition and that you don't frick with
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:25 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
LSU 4-1
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:26 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:You let me know when Ky jelly does anything in football.
Let me know when Mizzou gets to the Final Four the first time before bringing that weak sauce.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:26 pm to KCM0Tiger
This is a stupid fricking thread, but technically Ole Miss has won its division...check our banners out.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:29 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Big Ten
It's B1G, like my weiner.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:30 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
I don't care about playing Auburn on the big stage. It's tradition and that you don't frick with
i really am not against the permanent opponents at all but the "its tradition" line is complete BS. The conference shite all over LSU's traditions and we bent over and took it. If enough people wanted it so would yall.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:30 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
I don't care about playing Auburn on the big stage. It's tradition and that you don't frick with
I can see where keeping traditions would be a good argument for keeping it the way it is, but it just seems like it will eventually change wether we want it to or not. Money and the SECN might have a big impact
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:30 pm to KCM0Tiger
lol @ ole miss
Posted on 5/15/14 at 1:32 pm to LSUNV
what really sucks is we will play in athens once every 12 years.
12 YEARS! That just shows the scheduling is messed up. maybe a 9 game schedule is the answer if you want to keep permanent opponents (which im perfectly fine with).
12 YEARS! That just shows the scheduling is messed up. maybe a 9 game schedule is the answer if you want to keep permanent opponents (which im perfectly fine with).
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News