Started By
Message
The SEC should of chosen Nebraska not Missouri
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:39 pm
Now the SEC is stuck with a second rate Midwestern school when we could have gotten the best put of the area
Football
Athletes
Least it is another victory for most SEC East schools and Arkansas
Football
Athletes
Least it is another victory for most SEC East schools and Arkansas
12
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:41 pm to RackensackRazorback
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:42 pm to RackensackRazorback
All Mizzou All The Time
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:43 pm to Rebel Land Shark
quote:
All Mizzou All The Time
That was last fall.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:46 pm to RackensackRazorback
You have not beaten Mizzou every time
Not such an easy victory piggy
Not such an easy victory piggy
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:51 pm to TheRealTigah
We lead the all-time series vs. them.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:52 pm to RackensackRazorback
They have the division titles that Arkansas has in only 4 years.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:21 pm to RackensackRazorback
Should of yet could have?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:22 pm to RackensackRazorback
Nebraska is the definition of a big 10 school. Would not be a good fit at all for SEC football.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:28 pm to RackensackRazorback
I knew your mother.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:32 pm to rockytop627
Doesn't Mizzou fit the definition of a Big 10 school as well
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:38 pm to TheRealTigah
quote:
Doesn't Mizzou fit the definition of a Big 10 school as well
We can try and add the stars and bars to our state flag to go along with the .500 appearance rate in the SEC championship game since we joined if that would help.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:39 pm to RackensackRazorback
Killz?
Is that you?
Is that you?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:40 pm to wmr
quote:
Killz?
Is that you?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:42 pm to kilo
Too bad 5 or even 6 of the SEC West schools would have won the East those years
Four years later you still do not understand SEC culture. FYI it does not have anything to do with the Confederacy
Four years later you still do not understand SEC culture. FYI it does not have anything to do with the Confederacy
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:45 pm to TheRealTigah
quote:
Too bad 5 or even 6 of the SEC West schools would have won the East those years
Well that would be hard considering two West teams each of those years couldnt beat the East champions. 4-0 Mizzou went against the west in the regular season in those years... what recycled tRant nonsense you want to run out next? Please bring the "East was down" in regards to the 2013 season. I already have the research done for that.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:51 pm to kilo
The 2013 Mizzou team was impressive but during the heyday of the East in the 90's and early 2000's Do you really believe you would have won the division
Admit that coming in while UGA, UF and UT were down helped out a lot
Admit that coming in while UGA, UF and UT were down helped out a lot
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:58 pm to TheRealTigah
Lets look at the facts:
SEC East ranked teams per year(final national rankings):
1992: 8,10,12
1993: 5,12
1994: 7,22
1995: 2,3
1996: 1,9
1997: 4,10,7
1998: 1,5,14
1999: 12,9,16
2000: 10,19,20
2001: 4,3,13,22
2002: 3
2003: 7,15,24
2004: 13,7
2005: 10,12
2006: 1,25,23
2007: 2,12,13
2008: 1,13
2009: 3
2010: 22
2011: 9,19
2012: 5,9,8,23
2013: 5,4,24
SEC East ranked teams per year(final national rankings):
1992: 8,10,12
1993: 5,12
1994: 7,22
1995: 2,3
1996: 1,9
1997: 4,10,7
1998: 1,5,14
1999: 12,9,16
2000: 10,19,20
2001: 4,3,13,22
2002: 3
2003: 7,15,24
2004: 13,7
2005: 10,12
2006: 1,25,23
2007: 2,12,13
2008: 1,13
2009: 3
2010: 22
2011: 9,19
2012: 5,9,8,23
2013: 5,4,24
This post was edited on 4/7/16 at 12:00 am
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:59 pm to kilo
Where is 2014
Posted on 4/7/16 at 12:02 am to RackensackRazorback
Your grammar needs work. It's "should uv", not "should of".
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News