Started By
Message
re: The Real Question is: Who Will Win the East in 2014? Mizzou or Georgia?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:34 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:34 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
that's crazy! why isn't this stat discussed more often?
Probably because it is skewed.
UF (who would be part of the field) has won the east more since 1992 than anyone. Tenn has won it just as much as UGA. So using roadhouse logic how is the field the underdog???
Ill wait.
1
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:34 pm to CockRocket
quote:
Here's a historical trend for ya: Mizzou's last conference championship came in 1969, the same year as USC's.
Title of the thread is:
quote:
The Real Question is: Who Will Win the East in 2014? Mizzou or Georgia?
try to keep up
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:35 pm to CockRocket
where are the damn Georgia fans? I start a Mizzou/Georgia thread and SC fans flood into thread like South Carolina poors to the benefit office.
Someone please send out the bat signal to the Georgia fans.
Someone please send out the bat signal to the Georgia fans.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:35 pm to roadhouse
So you're saying y'all have low standards?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:36 pm to roadhouse
quote:
You do know that betting typically involves probabilities, correct? I'm hoping that you are also aware that probablilites are usually extrapolated from historical trends... Just stating facts and historical trends.
again florida has more east titles since 92 than UGA and Mizzou combined. How is that not used in your historical trend. You are so full of shite.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:37 pm to gamecocks22
quote:
how is the field the underdog???
By applying a higher coefficient of probability to recent victories. USCjr have a statistics department?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:38 pm to roadhouse
trying to hard man, you make no sense
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:38 pm to CockRocket
quote:
So you're saying y'all have low standards?
Saying the topic of discussion involves winning the east. Do you accuse your state governor of having low standards for not running for president?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:41 pm to gamecocks22
quote:
trying to hard man, you make no sense
I understand that the concept of applying more weight to recent victories when determining the likelihood of next year's conference victory may be difficult.
Let's start you out on learning the correct form of "to, too, and two" before moving you up to basic statistics, though.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:43 pm to roadhouse
Clearly South Carolina is desperate for a rival.
Rivalry denied.
Rivalry denied.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:44 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
where are the damn Georgia fans?
In.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:46 pm to roadhouse
quote:I guess since we've beaten y'all twice in a row now y'all should not even bother making the trip to Columbia, SC?
I understand that the concept of applying more weight to recent victories when determining the likelihood of next year's conference victory may be difficult.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:46 pm to mizzoukills
quote:It isn't much of a rivalry when one is undefeated against the other in conference play.
Rivalry denied
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:46 pm to roadhouse
quote:
Let's start you out on learning the correct form of "to, too, and two" before moving you up to basic statistics, though.
Oh, you are one those guys who points out typing mistakes on a MB. You sound awesome.
Since 1992 Tenn and UF are the elite SEC East programs. IDGAF which way you try and manipulate it.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:47 pm to CockRocket
Remember that time South Carolina had 3 consecutive 11 win seasons and still couldn't even win their division? Lulz
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:48 pm to KCM0Tiger
You still can't beat us. Get used to it.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:48 pm to KCM0Tiger
KCMO
quote:
Remember that time South Carolina had 3 consecutive 11 win seasons and still couldn't even win their division? Lulz
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:50 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
where are the damn Georgia fans?
We'd have been here if you said who'd win between missouri and SC.
Now there's no reason to get worked up. But it's fun watching it happen to the SC fans
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:52 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
But it's fun watching it happen to the SC fans
Its even more fun when some of them dont even realize what is really happening in this thread.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 2:52 pm to WG_Dawg
WG_Dawg
SC fans are clearly the most insecure bunch on the rant. No doubt
quote:
We'd have been here if you said who'd win between missouri and SC. Now there's no reason to get worked up. But it's fun watching it happen to the SC fans
SC fans are clearly the most insecure bunch on the rant. No doubt
Page 7 of 15
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News