Started By
Message
re: The big6 question
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:48 am to elvisleft
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:48 am to elvisleft
quote:
managed 3-9
We did that, thank you Mike Dubose. Speaking of, heard on the radio this morning that in the '73 Sugar Bowl, Jerry DiNardo was blocking Dubose on the 3rd down play that essentially sealed the win for ND.
This post was edited on 12/7/12 at 8:48 am
0
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:50 am to LSUsuperfresh
Thanks guys 
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:56 am to DWag215
So you're cool with no SEC championships? Well at least we know he's not an LSU fan
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:58 am to Gatoreng5
its about restoring order....
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:07 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
I'm tempted to make some sigs that say IDGAF Eight.
Please Belle make it happen
And can I have an Ole Miss one ... Please :puppydogeyes:
quote:
The next school that has a chance to crack the Big 6 is Ole Miss.
This post was edited on 12/7/12 at 9:10 am
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:33 am to Gatoreng5
It's a combination of having the newbie TAMU and paranoid butthurt that we are succeeding in the SEC. A&M has 18 Conference Titles from the SWC and Big 12 and 3 Nattys and just went 10-2 but of course "we don't belong" or "we will never belong" until we win 15 SEC Titles in a row or something like that. It usually follows as well with how we are going to get pwned next year and that Johnny Manziel is going to get "figured out" with absolutely no recognition that we have a ton of returning talent and are absolutely killing it in recruiting, esp in Texas.
So we get it. We will never be "Big 6" because we aren't founding members of the SEC. This isn't a new thing for us. In the Big 12 it was always Texas and OU thinking their shite didn't smell and that all of the years we had success didn't exist while the Tech's and Baylor's of the world hated us even more because we were clearly better than they were.
We are Texas A&M, respect us or don't cause we don't GAF. In the end the folks in the SEC are 10x more civil than the dysfunctional mess we have in our rearview mirror and we are happy as can be. Come on down to CS and discover what Tex Mex and BBQ made with beef are all about.
So we get it. We will never be "Big 6" because we aren't founding members of the SEC. This isn't a new thing for us. In the Big 12 it was always Texas and OU thinking their shite didn't smell and that all of the years we had success didn't exist while the Tech's and Baylor's of the world hated us even more because we were clearly better than they were.
We are Texas A&M, respect us or don't cause we don't GAF. In the end the folks in the SEC are 10x more civil than the dysfunctional mess we have in our rearview mirror and we are happy as can be. Come on down to CS and discover what Tex Mex and BBQ made with beef are all about.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:37 am to bulldawger
quote:
The next school that has a chance to crack the Big 6 is Ole Miss.
Would that make us the Big7? Would we eventually become the Big14 and suck like the Big10 or the Big12 or would we call ourselves the Big 6 and hold court with the other "Big Can't Count Conferences"?
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:43 am to LSUsuperfresh
Thanks for the link, part of Big 6
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:00 am to GambitAUfan
Kentucky 76
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:06 am to stat19
quote:
Would that make us the Big7?
No, they are right behind Auburn. If Ole Miss (or whomever) goes on a SEC championship run and has more SEC rings than Auburn, Ole Miss is in, Auburn is out.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:07 am to aggressor
quote:
It's a combination of having the newbie TAMU and paranoid butthurt that we are succeeding in the SEC. A&M has 18 Conference Titles from the SWC and Big 12 and 3 Nattys and just went 10-2 but of course "we don't belong" or "we will never belong" until we win 15 SEC Titles in a row or something like that. It usually follows as well with how we are going to get pwned next year and that Johnny Manziel is going to get "figured out" with absolutely no recognition that we have a ton of returning talent and are absolutely killing it in recruiting, esp in Texas.
So we get it. We will never be "Big 6" because we aren't founding members of the SEC. This isn't a new thing for us. In the Big 12 it was always Texas and OU thinking their shite didn't smell and that all of the years we had success didn't exist while the Tech's and Baylor's of the world hated us even more because we were clearly better than they were.
We are Texas A&M, respect us or don't cause we don't GAF. In the end the folks in the SEC are 10x more civil than the dysfunctional mess we have in our rearview mirror and we are happy as can be. Come on down to CS and discover what Tex Mex and BBQ made with beef are all about.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:15 am to Gatoreng5
Big 6: Because Tennessee and Auburn must feel relevant again.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:18 am to USMC Gators
If you can show me how any of our 3 Natty's is illegitimate I'm all ears. All 3 were undefeated SWC Champions and '19 was unscored upon. How many UPI titles do other SEC schools claim where they lost their bowl games yet aren't questioned?
DWI
DWI
Posted on 12/7/12 at 10:20 am to aggressor
Really? You want me to go there? 
Posted on 12/7/12 at 11:11 am to USMC Gators
now THAT shite is funny!!!
Aggies....
Aggies....
Posted on 12/7/12 at 11:38 am to USMC Gators
Moron. I claimed 18 Conf Titles which are all legit and that was simply a pic taken for the week or so between the "South" that was added to the stadium which was always what was planned but they didn't have the print yet. If you notice btw the '00s were the first decade A&M didn't win at least one conference title.
The Natty's are all what are officially recognized by other groups and they were legitimate undefeated Major Conference Champions. Were they retroactive? Sure, but that's hardly an A&M thing. They were still legit because they played a good schedule and went undefeated. A&M doesn't even recognize the '17 season when they were SWC Champs and were undefeated and unscored upon. Take away all the Non undefeated National Championships for SEC teams before you question any of A&M's.
Are we the greatest college football team ever? Of course not, but we do have a solid history of winning with just a few down periods.
DWI. Or don't. We aren't going anywhere and we didn't come to the SEC to be an also ran.
The Natty's are all what are officially recognized by other groups and they were legitimate undefeated Major Conference Champions. Were they retroactive? Sure, but that's hardly an A&M thing. They were still legit because they played a good schedule and went undefeated. A&M doesn't even recognize the '17 season when they were SWC Champs and were undefeated and unscored upon. Take away all the Non undefeated National Championships for SEC teams before you question any of A&M's.
Are we the greatest college football team ever? Of course not, but we do have a solid history of winning with just a few down periods.
DWI. Or don't. We aren't going anywhere and we didn't come to the SEC to be an also ran.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 11:42 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
I'm tempted to make some sigs that say IDGAF Eight.
Better make it DGAF Seven
We've got our Big One sigs.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 11:46 am to Gatoreng5
quote:
Whats the deal with the "big 6" talk around here lately? Posters are updating their sigs? what did I miss?
Don't listen to all of the other explanations, they are simply wrong.
The real meaning behind the big 6 is, they are the 5 teams that want to be associated with Bama (dick riders).
Posted on 12/7/12 at 11:55 am to USMC Gators
Haha you jelly.
Posted on 12/7/12 at 12:04 pm to Pigfeet
You sound butt hurt man?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News