Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M fans kissing
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:13 pm to Sig
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:13 pm to Sig
quote:
Sometimes homos kiss.. shite happens.. Think there are a few pics of LSU fans doing it.
I actually watched the replay of the game and the camera guy targeted those two so they had obviously kissed on all the other TDs. At first I was hoping this was some kind of weirs aTm hazing shite but on the replay it was evident that those two were filled with lust of the other and planned to pack some fudge after game. Y'all need to get that shite in check. If we wanted to add a team full of ghey fans we would have pulled Miami or UCLA.
1
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:16 pm to JordonfortheJ
quote:
You got to realize the also the South is still stuck in the 60s
I'm proud of the fact that we don't accept open displays of affection by homos at football games
And you misspelled Jordan
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:16 pm to MaroonNation
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:18 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Adopting little gingers...or non-gingers then converting them with hair color sets.
don't forget the tanning bed
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:18 pm to MaroonNation
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:21 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Anyone have the pic of the two chics kissing at the Auburn vs West Virginia game
This is perfectly acceptable and should be encouraged.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:27 pm to MaroonNation
I dont think many people here really HATE gays.
But very few straight men will be okay with someone calling them a fig or thinking that they're really gay. As long as that continues (will last forever IMO), people will not want to be associated with gays. There's something gross and immoral about the gays, again IMO, which is why I wouldn't have people thinking I'm gay. That's where the negative connotation comes from.
and also
GOD HATES figs.
But very few straight men will be okay with someone calling them a fig or thinking that they're really gay. As long as that continues (will last forever IMO), people will not want to be associated with gays. There's something gross and immoral about the gays, again IMO, which is why I wouldn't have people thinking I'm gay. That's where the negative connotation comes from.
and also
GOD HATES figs.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:31 pm to MaroonNation
Let the hate out boys.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:33 pm to MaroonNation
I dont endorse their lifestyle, or anything about it. I will not vote for any of their "rights" or support just anything they ask for right now. But they are still people and its their right to do so. Being gay is just a small part of a person. That said, this is also at a school where the students just last year voted to cut the funding to the GLBT help/support group on campus by a fairly wide margin IIRC. In reality, being gay at A&M is about as popular as being a tu fan.
This post was edited on 9/26/12 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:34 pm to Sig
quote:
Sometimes homos kiss.. shite happens..
Until the SEC announces no homeaux kissing, it is going to become more prevalent.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:42 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Not really......
Yeah, it is really. One situation is a group of people who were forcibly brought to the U.S. to labor as less than humans due to their genetics, nationality and some bad luck, and who were later rightly freed from their bondage, only to be further discriminated against.
The other situation is a family of origin issue that leads to a deviant and disgusting lifestyle that those who practice it know is as wrong as anyone else.
Two very, very different scenarios.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:46 pm to LegacyAggie
The only problem I have with your statement is the part about homosexuality being a very small part of the person. TO the homosexual their sexuality as well as being sexual are very big parts of their lives.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:19 pm to LovetheLord
quote:
The only problem I have with your statement is the part about homosexuality being a very small part of the person. TO the homosexual their sexuality as well as being sexual are very big parts of their lives.
I take issue with this - some people who identify as heterosexual or homosexual, do not use that fact to define their existence or make a big deal out of it. Others do. Sexuality, both as a matter of status/identification/practice, might be a small part of the total person, or it might be a large part, or, as with most things and most people, somewhere in between.
There are 6 billion + individuals out there who are each unique, in some ways drastically. While I don't propose we celebrate every individual trait anyone might have, ever - the mere fact that a person is homosexual is not a bar to my treating them as I would any human being. Hopefully, they feel the same about us breeders.
This post was edited on 9/26/12 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:22 pm to LovetheLord
quote:
TO the homosexual their sexuality as well as being sexual are very big parts of their lives.
Truth, or else they wouldn't try so hard to get acceptance from society. It's like drug addicts, they don't want to be the only ones doing it because they can't handle the level of guilt and shame associated with it, therefore they try to bring others into it with htem so they can have a false sense of acceptance.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:31 pm to MaroonNation
quote:
Truth, or else they wouldn't try so hard to get acceptance from society. It's like drug addicts, they don't want to be the only ones doing it because they can't handle the level of guilt and shame associated with it, therefore they try to bring others into it with htem so they can have a false sense of acceptance.
I strongly recommend we pump the brakes a little, man. Maroon - I hear you. I was raised with traditional values. I'm not crazy about the in-your-face homosexual "special rights" movement, and particularly I'm not terribly convinced by the parallel to the black civil rights movement.
However, if we can draw a distinction in the way we view "homosexuality" (Biblically, spiritually), versus how we treat and accept the person who identifies as homosexual - the New Testament pretty much requires us to love and protect our fellow man, despite sin - and heteros are just as guilty of promiscuity, drunkenness, adultery, blasphemy and other abominations.
From a practical, secular matter, a stable, middle-class homosexual (or couple), with whom you can agree and cooperate on many issues can be a far better asset to society than any number of hardcore drug addicts.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:57 pm to Ace Midnight
gayness shouldn't be celebrated.. i won't throw stones at them or publicly humiliate them... but the fact that they want it celebrated is beyond me. but, just about everything in our society is inverted right now.. so this glorification of gayness is par for the course.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:06 pm to mograyback
What the hell just happened? Can we please get the Rant back on track with the trollerwagon?
Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:20 pm to Ace Midnight
Indeed, the Bible does call upon us to see the homosexual as a person, with dignity and value in the eyes of God. It is also true that people of all natures commit abominable sins, and sometimes snowmen, including all manner of heterosexual sins. They also cheat, lie and steal.
I think perhaps the reason that the homosexual issue rears its head so sharply is due to its being such a particularly aberrant sexual sin and not only being tolerated, but celebrated and promoted. When it was a closeted activity, and those who practiced it accepted the impropriety of the behavior, the issue, while having different repercussions, didn’t seem to elicit the same visceral reactions that it does today. Yes, one can anecdotally point to violent and hateful treatments of homosexuals in the past. However, one can also anecdotally point to many, many cases in which people simply knew about the two old men or ladies who were "roommates" and they lived very tolerantly along side of them.
I have a problem, however, with living along side of someone who may attempt to proselytize my children with the gay agenda.
As to the civil rights analogies, you are right. The two scenarios are apples to oranges. Being gay does not equal being black.
Your responses are well thought out, temperate in nature and winsomely put forth. I do appreciate that.
I think perhaps the reason that the homosexual issue rears its head so sharply is due to its being such a particularly aberrant sexual sin and not only being tolerated, but celebrated and promoted. When it was a closeted activity, and those who practiced it accepted the impropriety of the behavior, the issue, while having different repercussions, didn’t seem to elicit the same visceral reactions that it does today. Yes, one can anecdotally point to violent and hateful treatments of homosexuals in the past. However, one can also anecdotally point to many, many cases in which people simply knew about the two old men or ladies who were "roommates" and they lived very tolerantly along side of them.
I have a problem, however, with living along side of someone who may attempt to proselytize my children with the gay agenda.
As to the civil rights analogies, you are right. The two scenarios are apples to oranges. Being gay does not equal being black.
Your responses are well thought out, temperate in nature and winsomely put forth. I do appreciate that.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:22 pm to LovetheLord
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:23 pm to A&M's Slush Fund
quote:
What the hell just happened? Can we please get the Rant back on track with the trollerwagon?
No shite! Take this debate to the OT!
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News