Started By
Message

re: Tennessee universities for free speech

Posted on 5/19/17 at 7:57 am to
Posted by tigerfan182
Franklin, Tn
Member since Sep 2009
2779 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 7:57 am to
Winning
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23832 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:12 am to
Now, it's time to race bait and negatively recruit against Tennessee
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 8:13 am
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:16 am to
Oh you know this is gonna be used against them on the recruiting trail.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8186 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

But if they mean conservative is anti race mixing, gas all the Jewish people and let's incite a race war. then that probably is not appropriate and I think. A college should. Be able to tell those people to go frick themselves




I strongly disagree with your position.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8186 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:27 am to
I believe the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU should jump onboard to sue these groups for violating the civil rights of conservative, or liberal for that matter, speakers. It's what they say they are all about, right?
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:44 am to
quote:

 Southern Poverty Law Center 

That bigoted little racist Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty Hate Group will never defend the rights of a conservative.
Posted by Torch
Northshore Dr
Member since Feb 2017
3282 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:05 pm to
Before we devolve into a Thunderdome-esque brawl based on assumptions of what is in the law, why don't we all just read it?

TN Free Speech Amendment
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5156 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

But if they mean conservative is anti race mixing, gas all the Jewish people and let's incite a race war. then that probably is not appropriate and I think. A college should. Be able to tell those people to go frick themselves



Firstly, anyone espousing those views would not be invited to speak. Secondly, unpopular speech and speech that falls outside the Overton Window is the most in need of protection. I fundamentally disagree with anyone who believes free speech should have any qualifiers and that censorship is ever justified.

Honestly, I don't respect the opinion of people who say "I support free speech but not for X." If you're in favor of censorship, at least own your position. Don't do some Orwellian "all speech is free but some speech is freer than others" nonsense.
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 12:15 pm
Posted by Torch
Northshore Dr
Member since Feb 2017
3282 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:12 pm to
Hot takes:

Express support for rallies and peaceful protest is written into the law. Unless you believe that BLM is inherently violent, they will still be allowed to rally/protest.

Bipartisan support for the bill in both houses, with 85-7 vote in TN House and unanimous(30-0) vote in TN Senate.

Bill encourages contesting ideas that one disagrees with, but not stifling the expression of such ideas.
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:12 pm to
it mentioned "interfering with public speakers" as being a felony... so does this mean when reporters cutoff Butch at a presser and ask him why there were 14 defensive players on the field they will be charged with a felony?
Posted by BurgTiger
Member since Feb 2014
2771 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:28 pm to
Tennessee, hats off to you my friend. I only hope the rest of us will follow your lead.
Posted by Torch
Northshore Dr
Member since Feb 2017
3282 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:28 pm to
I'm not really sure who brought the whole felony thing into this conversation. I can't find any verifiable source to back up that assertion.
Posted by BigOrangeVols
Knoxville
Member since Jul 2015
3067 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:30 pm to
I'm fine with it
Posted by morriscat2
tennessee
Member since Jun 2012
1938 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
The felony is designed to prohibit suppression of free speech ,or in other words protect free speech. Why don't you see that? Surely you don't approve of what those punks are doing at Cal Berkeley? The new law is designed to prevent that.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8186 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Before we devolve into a Thunderdome-esque brawl based on assumptions of what is in the law, why don't we all just read it?


Can't stop, won't stop.
Posted by MeatPants
Member since Nov 2015
8853 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 5:31 pm to
Why would it be a big deal if a university doesn't want a KKK rally on its grounds.


Political correctness, Conservatives, liberal. It's so fricking tired. Everyone has been so oppressed and persecuted

We are a nation of babies. And that includes conservatives too
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 6:19 pm to
Congratulations Tennessee! For years academia has been the bastion for far left ideologies and unrealistic world views, while using oppressive measures to keep their students from being exposed to differing opinions. Maybe this will be the beginning of a new movement to neutralize the monopoly it's had on the minds of our young people.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

But if they mean conservative is anti race mixing, gas all the Jewish people and let's incite a race war. then that probably is not appropriate and I think. A college should. Be able to tell those people to go frick themselves



This cliched horse shite is what liberals call ALL conservative speakers and if you say otherwise you are full of shite.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Express support for rallies and peaceful protest is written into the law. Unless you believe that BLM is inherently violent, they will still be allowed to rally/protest.



In fact, I think it could be argued that BLM and such groups would support this law (which may be why it passed so easily) because it could be read to protect them and their "free speech" just as much as it protects the type of speakers most think this is designed to protect. Now, the real question will be how it is enforced.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter