Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Tell me about Lambert's performance...I didn't see the game

Posted on 9/21/15 at 1:59 pm
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 1:59 pm
It appears he is getting a ton of praise.

His stats against a shitty USCe team are incredible. Were they tough throws? Did he have some "wow" plays? If UGA has themselves a great QB with that defense and run game, they will be very tough to beat and should be expected to run the table in the East.

Against USC:

24/25, 330 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs.

Against Vandy and ULM:

19/33, 257 yards, 2 TDs (both against ULM), 0 INTs.




What clicked in the last game that didn't in the first two?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95872 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:01 pm to
Safe throws, but there were plenty that could have been dropped. 20 straight completions to end the game is impressive no matter what.
Posted by Edawg
Jekyll Island
Member since Sep 2012
1297 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

What clicked in the last game that didn't in the first two?

\
IMO, confidence.
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
1525 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:03 pm to
made a good bit of high percentage throws, yet also made some very good downfield tosses. Great game for his confidence, and i don't envy anyone having to play Georgia now that they look to be gelling
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:05 pm to
Combination of multiple factors imo:

1) Lambert was on fire. You don't complete 24/25 against anyone if you aren't. Only made a few tough throws, but they were on the money.

2) USCe was terrible defensively. Completely helpless dealing with Mitchell, Michel, Godwin, etc. in space. They were open a lot.

3) The WRs, TEs, and RBs were excellent.

4) UGA opened up the playbook a lot from the previous two weeks. USCe had to deal with a lot more scheme-wise than Vandy or ULM did, which led to more UGA receivers running wide open imo.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 2:06 pm
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

What clicked in the last game that didn't in the first two?


Honestly, it came down to play calling, really. We moved our play makers around a lot and used them to exploit mismatches. If you compare the first two games to the USC game, it's pretty easy to see that the coaching staff didn't want to tip their hand too much in regards to what packages we would be running.

A lot of it had to with the fact that USC was giving our WR's big cushions and we killed them in the intermediate passing game, too.

He was getting bashed pretty hard for his 0-7 start against Vandy (perhaps it was deserved), but he's really only played poorly for 1 half of football so far. He's not a Matt Stafford type, but I think he'll be capable of beating teams if they sell out to stop the run. He'll never have a stat line like he had on Saturday ever again, but I think he showed that if the coaches give him the plays to work with, then he can execute well.
Posted by DawgFARKer
Sandestin
Member since Dec 2009
4843 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:07 pm to
Lambert played with MUCH more confidence. Richt and Schotty dialed up a game plan to start the first drive with safe, short passes to drive confidence.

Lambert threw a few in the 15-20, maybe 25 yard range but no true deep balls yet - but then again there was no need to.

SC was playing soft coverage all game (8-9 yards off, no pressing) so Schotty & Lambert took advantage of that all night long.

Teams stack the box to attempt to stop Chubb and that leads vulnerability to be exposed by hitting Sony Michel and some of the wideouts with quick slants and intermediate routes.

Lambert was bitingly accurate all night long, the only incompletion was an intentional pass out of the end zone when the TE was covered.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 2:08 pm
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25656 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:08 pm to
We threw the ball 15 times on 1st down Sat. he went 15/15 I believe, we threw on 1st down 9 times total in the 1st 2 games & basically just threw when we had to. The playbook was opened up past page one Sat...

Kids head was messed up from his time at UVA, Shotty has been bringing him along slowly & put him in a position to succeed Sat. a lotta slants & passes to the flat early & his confidence seemed to just take off...

SCe's D is pretty bad but 24/25 against nothing but air is pretty good...

Jury is still out but most Dawgs feel a hella lot better today about the QB situation than we did Sat. at 5:59 EST...

This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 2:11 pm
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39971 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:19 pm to
Here's a good write up for a UGA beat writer.

quote:

GREYSON LAMBERT’S DAY

– Yeah, Lambert was bitingly accurate. There was only one pass where it looked like the receiver saved him: Michael Chigbu’s catch in the fourth quarter. (It was behind him.) Otherwise every pass was on the money, slants hitting the receiver in stride, short passes and downfield passes hitting the receiver right in the hands.

– I counted twice, just twice, that Lambert was even hit, at least on screen. The quick-passing strategy was part of it, as does great blocking. Lambert also clearly has confidence in his line now, and in the play calls. There were several downfield passes where Lambert stood and waited for the play to develop, and it paid off.

– How many times did Lambert check down? More as the game went on. For instance, on a 15-yard downfield pass to Malcolm Mitchell in the second quarter, Lambert either looked off from a shorter receiver or checked off him before seeing Mitchell streaking open. Later he rolled right and looked up to see Jackson Harris open, and hit him for a 15-yard gain. And as Lambert got comfortable there were a lot more instances of looking away from his intended receiver until the last second: For instance, the first two plays of the second half, passes to Malcolm Mitchell.

But don’t obsess about checking down; sometimes the play is designed well enough not to doo that. On the 17-yard pass to Terry Godwin to finish the first quarter, Godwin actually stutter-stepped upon the snap while four other receivers spread across the field. It was an intentional hesitation by Godwin, who then was wide open in the middle of the field for Lambert to nail him in stride.

The pass to Jay Rome was similar to that: Sony Michel looked to be the obvious check-down guy, but Lambert kept his eyes downfield, waiting for Rome to get open, which he did, and the ball got there when he did.

It’s almost like, yes, Lambert was staring down his mark, but to the defense there wasn’t anything there, but it turns out there was.

– Yes, a lot of high-percentage passes at the start to establish confidence. But as the game went on there were a lot of tougher throws, including a couple where the timing was remarkable considering the little time Lambert has had with his receivers: The 19-yard sideline pass to Reggie Davis in the first quarter, splitting two defenders, and the 25-yarder to Mitchell in the fourth quarter, when Mitchell turned around for the ball at the last moment.

Yes, Malcolm Mitchell had open field.
Yes, Malcolm Mitchell had open field.
The drive near the end of the first half to score – 78 yards in an efficient 8 plays and 2:03 – was reminiscent of the machine that was Georgia’s offense during the Aaron Murray-Mike Bobo yaers. Murray, in the house watching his replacement as the No. 11 quarterback, probably recognized it.

– By now the only incompletion of the game, ending the first drive with 7:18 left in the first quarter, has already been analyzed ad nauseum. Mitchell was indeed running open in the middle of the field, and Lambert should have checked down to him, in which case it almost certainly would have been a touchdown. Certainly a first down. But Lambert was locked in on Blazevich in the end zone, and at least saw there was too much coverage and threw it away. We’d seen a lot of that from him the first two weeks, reading the coverage well and placing it where only his receiver could make a great catch. (With the exception of the dropped interception at Vanderbilt.)

– Remember last week when it seemed Lambert (and Brice Ramsey) had their feet even before every shotgun play that was a run, and offset when it was a pass? That wasn’t as evident this time.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Here's a good write up for a UGA beat writer.

quote:
GREYSON LAMBERT’S DAY

– Yeah, Lambert was bitingly accurate.


quote:

DawgFARKer online on 9/21/15 at 2:07 pm to TheCaterpillar


Lambert was bitingly accurate all night long, the only incompletion was an intentional pass out of the end zone when the TE was covered.


Hmmmmmmm, seems to be a unique adjective to be used by 2 different folks.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 2:30 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32797 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:42 pm to
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63865 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:48 pm to
7.5 minute highlight reel
LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter