Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:50 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:That makes a lot more sense than the gibberish in the OP.
All he said was "BAMA lost and has a CHANCE to play in any of the 5 BCS games."
He then went on to explain how it COULD happen. He clearly says it is terribly unlikely. He was just making the point that it is interesting that it is POSSIBLE.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:51 pm to 756
Next Year with the 4 Team playoff starting, the Gumps/Auburn game (finish and all) would be meaningless...Both teams would be the 4 team
mix anyway.
mix anyway.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:53 pm to idlewatcher
No kidding! Why do people keep wanting to give Bama do-overs? They lost. That's it.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:54 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Brad Edwards is a bammer grad- heck yeah he wants another shot at us.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:57 pm to 11thACR
quote:Another reason to hate the new playoff system.
Next Year with the 4 Team playoff starting, the Gumps/Auburn game (finish and all) would be meaningless...Both teams would be the 4 team mix anyway.
And I'd gladly say that if the kick had been good. I thought both the mulligans for the BCSC were stupid, especially since they were both rematches of tightly contested big rivalry games (F$U-UF in '97, Bama-LSU in '11).
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:02 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
Why taint an incrdebible regular season match up with a meaningless bowl game.
Neither team would give a shite.
Are you fricking serious?
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:03 pm to 756
Blame the bowl committees if this happens, not Alabama 
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:06 pm to A_Leather_Glove
Yeah if this happens it's because Sugar Bowl committee politicked into hosting a rematch.
It would sell seats and TV. It would be hyped up to no end.
It would be an epic matchup with a 50-50 split of fans in the stands.
It would sell seats and TV. It would be hyped up to no end.
It would be an epic matchup with a 50-50 split of fans in the stands.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:13 pm to 11thACR
quote:
Next Year with the 4 Team playoff starting, the Gumps/Auburn game (finish and all) would be meaningless...Both teams would be the 4 team mix anyway.
With the Gumps, once again, sitting at home while AU plays the extra game the Gumps were not good enough to qualify for, despite having the easier schedule.
Auburn losing the SECCG eliminates them from the Final Four....
Sounds great, doesn't it?
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:15 pm to cjared036
The gump entitlement mentality is strong these days....
This post was edited on 12/2/13 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:15 pm to cjared036
quote:
Yeah if this happens it's because Sugar Bowl committee politicked into hosting a rematch.
It would sell seats and TV. It would be hyped up to no end.
It would be an epic matchup with a 50-50 split of fans in the stands.
I disagree. It would be like following up Breaking Bad with a sitcom starring Skyler and Walt's early married life.
Nothing that could happen is going to surpass what already happened, it's impossible.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:16 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
The SEC championship game will end up fricking the conference from here on out with the playoff.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:16 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
Auburn best not play the walk ons because they would be running into a very angry and highly motivated Alabama team.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:16 pm to fuego5435
quote:
How could that possibly happen? I know i heard that Alabama is still mathematically in the picture, but would the bowl committee really want to see that game again?
They wanted to see Bama-LSU after 9-6. Why not? The Bama-AU game was infinitely more entertaining.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:17 pm to antibarner
quote:
Auburn best not play the walk ons because they would be running into a very angry and highly motivated Alabama team.
Y'all were not motivated Saturday?
Sounds like poor coaching to me.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:18 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
Delany argued to make it a requirement that all teams in the playoff win their conference.
But there are potential conference tie's in the big12. That's the biggest reason why a conference can get two I to the playoff.
But there are potential conference tie's in the big12. That's the biggest reason why a conference can get two I to the playoff.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:18 pm to cjared036
quote:
Yeah if this happens it's because Sugar Bowl committee politicked into hosting a rematch.
It would sell seats and TV. It would be hyped up to no end.
It would be an epic matchup with a 50-50 split of fans in the stands.
And we would beat that arse
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:18 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
With the Gumps, once again, sitting at home while AU plays the extra game the Gumps were not good enough to qualify for, despite having the easier schedule.
Auburn losing the SECCG eliminates them from the Final Four....
Sounds great, doesn't it?
It would be the end of the 2013 Barner dickride. That's something you'd need to consider.
Posted on 12/2/13 at 3:37 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
You incorrectly characterized his statement.
while your statement is correct he specifically said Sugar Bowl officials has not ruled it out and if both teams were available it would something they would consider
This post was edited on 12/2/13 at 3:39 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News