Started By
Message

re: Stanford or Arkansas

Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:04 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261685 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:04 pm to
Stanford. Better all around team.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Best coached team in America.


with equal qb talent and less talented everywhere else i'm not sure it would matter because it isn't like petrino is a bad coach.
Posted by badlands
Member since Apr 2008
2313 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:06 pm to
Coin flip that Stanford wins 6 of 10.
This post was edited on 1/3/11 at 11:10 pm
Posted by 3rdRowTailgater
Tulsa
Member since Jul 2006
18636 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:06 pm to
Stanford by 10.
Posted by Shaft Williams
Central City, LA
Member since Jul 2010
9455 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:08 pm to
The only time Stanford saw an offense anything close to Arkansas, Oregon smoked 'em. Arkansas would do the same Oregon did to Stanford.
Posted by NachoSancho
NW LA
Member since Jan 2006
472 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:14 pm to
This year, Stanford by 2 td's. Most other years, Ar-Kansas by a td.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

The only time Stanford saw an offense anything close to Arkansas, Oregon smoked 'em. Arkansas would do the same Oregon did to Stanford.


Hell the only time they saw a RANKED TEAM they were smoked.

-Interesting Note: The four BCS teams thus far have played, going into their bowl games, a grand total of FIVE ranked opponents (as the rankings stand nd are likely to finish up). Every team in the SEC WEst played at least four.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:15 pm to
based on what?
Posted by Hogules
Huntington
Member since Jun 2008
284 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:16 pm to
Arkansas would beat Stanford like the Cardinals owed them money!

VT is all ESPN hype/smoke and mirrors, with little to no substance.

I'd also take Bobby Petrino over CJH at Stanford, but that's just my personal preference.
Posted by Shaft Williams
Central City, LA
Member since Jul 2010
9455 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Hell the only time they saw a RANKED TEAM they were smoked. -Interesting Note: The four BCS teams thus far have played, going into their bowl games, a grand total of FIVE ranked opponents (as the rankings stand nd are likely to finish up). Every team in the SEC WEst played at least four.


Great post!
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

VT is all ESPN hype/smoke and mirrors, with little to no substance.


I've always thought of VT as a solid 15-20 team (maybe number ten on a great year) thats hyped up to be something they're not, a legitmate top 5 or 10 team.
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
8323 posts
Posted on 1/3/11 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

And it's not even close imo.



middle of the pack SEC defense > Stanford defense


hogs by eleventy-threve
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
6935 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 1:42 am to
There is a lot to be said for being battle-tested.

I suspect the game would be played in the high 30s to low 40s; the difference would be an SEC-tested set of lines against a team that was manhandled up front by Oregon and was, while at times pretty dominant, had a couple of lapses that Luck bailed them out of in PAC-10 play. Ultimately, the only way Stanford wins is forcing turnovers-- and more than 3 of them.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32758 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 9:07 am to
It'd be a fun high scoring game. 2 great offenses. Two solid but unspectacular defenses.
Posted by Africom
Stuttgart, Germany
Member since Mar 2008
1641 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 9:34 am to
Stanford could win the SEC, this is why Aubbies will lose to the Dux.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 9:37 am to
Stanford.
Posted by KingofDeQueen
Member since Oct 2009
887 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 10:01 am to
they're the same team.

Arkansas's skill guys are better.

Arkansas wins. hoes.
Posted by gabster121
midwest
Member since Dec 2010
23 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 11:06 am to
If you saw the second half of yesterday's game you'd be crazy to think any team would "smoke" Stanford right now. They have the best defense in the Pac 10 and the second-best offense. That is something. Maybe Alabama and LSU have a better defense than Stanford right now, but I don't think any other SEC team's defense is as good. This is definately one of the top 5 teams in the country. I would say the other 4 are Oregon, Auburn, TCU and Alabama. I don't think you could really say who's best amongst these teams and would have to let them play.

With that said I think Stanford beats Arkansas 8/10 times.

I don't understand the SOS argument as to who is better. I can see it for who is "more deserving" but as to who is better it doesn't make sense. If a team in C-USA recruited a team full of Jesuses and went unbeaten you guys would still say they are not as good as Arkansas because "Arkansas played 5 ranked opponets!!!!11!". SOS is beyond a team's control and should have little bearing on how well they play/how good they are. Again, see 2009 Utah vs. Alabama.
///but but but they just didn't show up!!!
Posted by toomersdrugs
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2010
4631 posts
Posted on 1/4/11 at 11:07 am to
stanford looked pretty good last night. id like to see that matchup. id take arky by 2
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter