Started By
Message
Spanberger, Rooker, or Diechmann?
Posted on 5/27/17 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 5/27/17 at 3:58 pm
Which one would you take for your team? Why?
Posted on 5/27/17 at 3:59 pm to RB10
That's not the answer, Sir. :))
Posted on 5/27/17 at 4:14 pm to Sao
Wtf??? I didn't understand how in the world you guys finished high school. Lmao.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 4:16 pm to Live2CTigersWin
Big D.
BTW, what is the deal with this announcer who sounds like he needs to clear his throat? He doesn't seem to like the Tigahs.
BTW, what is the deal with this announcer who sounds like he needs to clear his throat? He doesn't seem to like the Tigahs.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 4:16 pm to Live2CTigersWin
But it's unanimous.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 4:20 pm to Live2CTigersWin
You are definitely right about those 3. They are the best.
This post was edited on 5/27/17 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 5/27/17 at 4:27 pm to Live2CTigersWin
Well, being an LSU fan I'll say Deichmann and keep my P&G colored glasses on.
If your question is who is the better batter: I'll say Rooker by a slim margin; better approach at the plate. None of those 3 are a one trick pony btw (before anyone extrapolates that statement). For example, those extra base hits by Rooker...wow. And before anyone says it, Rooker has only about 3 less BB than Deichmann.
If your question is who is the better baseball player:
Again, Rooker. More versatile player. However, Rooker is being asked to do more things by his team. Both Deichmann and Rooker are very good athletes. But I'll say Rooker is a more complete player right now, even though I think Deichmann has it in him. For example, Rooker has double digit stolen bases.
If your question is who is the better batter: I'll say Rooker by a slim margin; better approach at the plate. None of those 3 are a one trick pony btw (before anyone extrapolates that statement). For example, those extra base hits by Rooker...wow. And before anyone says it, Rooker has only about 3 less BB than Deichmann.
If your question is who is the better baseball player:
Again, Rooker. More versatile player. However, Rooker is being asked to do more things by his team. Both Deichmann and Rooker are very good athletes. But I'll say Rooker is a more complete player right now, even though I think Deichmann has it in him. For example, Rooker has double digit stolen bases.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 6:15 pm to Live2CTigersWin
I'd take one, but would consider taking all three.
Yeah, I'd take all three.
Yeah, I'd take all three.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 8:45 pm to Reservoir dawg
My pick is Diechmann, the guy can hit a ball past Nicholson Drive.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:19 pm to Live2CTigersWin
Tough call. Rooker had a fantastic year. Diechmann is a hoss. But, right now, I'd take Spanberger.
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:27 pm to Live2CTigersWin
The SEC player of the year prob
Posted on 5/27/17 at 9:31 pm to Live2CTigersWin
Rooker is ridiculous I would take him as a pro prospect I would take deichman
Posted on 5/28/17 at 9:44 am to Central Pork
If you are talking bout your college team, it's a toss up that Rooker wins in my book. He's had a solid career capped off with this season's MVP performance. Pro scouts, according to the SEC Now guys rate Rooker & Diechmann higher than Spanberger because those 2 have been more consistently good in their careers, whereas Spanberger has really only had this one season. As a pitcher, I mite claim a sore arm in warmups & avoid any of them.
Posted on 5/28/17 at 10:02 am to Live2CTigersWin
They are all damn good players, but Rooker has more doubles and stolen bases. That gives him an edge over the other two IMO.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News