Started By
Message
re: South Carolina may be a player if they can land Golson.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 2:04 pm to momentoftruth87
Posted on 5/8/15 at 2:04 pm to momentoftruth87
Lulz totes
0
Posted on 5/8/15 at 2:19 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
They have a black QB currently commited and he's going to be good.
No he's not.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 2:23 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 5/8/15 at 3:05 pm to JesusQuintana
Two seasons ago Spurrier led USC to it's most productive offensive season in program history with Connor Shaw, a dual threat QB, at the helm.
Last season Spurrier led USC to it's 3rd most productive offensive season ever with Dylan Thompson, a pro-style QB.
USC will be OK....
Last season Spurrier led USC to it's 3rd most productive offensive season ever with Dylan Thompson, a pro-style QB.
USC will be OK....
Posted on 5/8/15 at 3:07 pm to JesusQuintana
Or he may come in & divide the team; I'd stick with what we have now
Posted on 5/8/15 at 4:29 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
quote:
No he's not.
You don't become a Top 10 QB in the nation without being pretty good.
LINK
You do if they are basing it off of his athletism.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:02 pm to JesusQuintana
We're a player with or without him. I don't think he's coming here though. I'd be surprised if he did
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:18 pm to CarolinaCock
quote:
We're a player with or without him. I don't think he's coming here though. I'd be surprised if he did
You're absolutely a player with him. Without him you're again quarterbackless.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:20 pm to FootballNostradamus
Oh look. You're in another South Carolina thread. Shocked, I tell you.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:40 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
No he's not.
Care to give a rational reason why? Or is it just cuz?
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:43 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
You're absolutely a player with him. Without him you're again quarterbackless.
Your mother is a player ... you sheep humping taterhead frick.
Why are you here again? Oh, that's right. It's spring time. All the barnyard creatures are allowed to hump their own kind until late June ... then you and your boys will start penning them again until the calves and the lambs are birthed for your humping pleasures.
Take your taterhead arse back to the ACCr.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 5:52 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
So you're saying he's athletic ... but he's not going to be any good. Is that correct?
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 8:32 pm to FootballNostradamus
Typical
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:19 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Notre Dame also has to grant his release before he can even be taking seriously. At this point, he is just pandering for interest.
I thought he graduated this month, doesn't that mean Notre Dame has no say in the matter?
I think it would be funny if he went to Texas and then they beat the Irish in the first game.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:21 pm to JesusQuintana
South Carolina's problem last year was not their offense.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:25 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
They are kind of a dark horse anyway IMO because they addressed their major area of weakness with some possible immediate Impact JUCO guys.
If they can land Golson, Spurrier can employ the same types of things they did with Shaw. They have the best WR in the conference and a solid group of RB .
This may be a team that could make some noise who doesn't have any expectations at all.
Even with the arse whipping you will experience in Fayetteville, I'm relying on you to take care of SC.
You can handle that can't you ?
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:31 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
They have a black QB currently commited and he's going to be good.
And another one signed and incoming to the roster this fall....
Posted on 5/9/15 at 1:50 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
They are kind of a dark horse anyway IMO because they addressed their major area of weakness with some possible immediate Impact JUCO guys.
If they can land Golson, Spurrier can employ the same types of things they did with Shaw. They have the best WR in the conference and a solid group of RB .
This may be a team that could make some noise who doesn't have any expectations at all.
No. It's actually nice that nobody is talking about SC right now, and if they are, it's about how bad SC is going to be for the next 20 years.
Let's keep doing that. We like that.
So no, SC will not be a player with or without Golson.
Posted on 5/9/15 at 2:52 pm to scrooster
I don't think he has the mental toughness/awareness to be a good qb. I think he can be average but he would be better suited at another position. This after watching him live 6-8 times and breaking down 12-16 of his teams game film.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News