Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:20 pm to ELVIS U
oh, so you can contine to go .500 vs him? how many of you dip shits do i have to do this too?
here, allow me to go ahead and give my response to your childish rebuttal
LSU is 3-3 vs Mark Richt
2003: LSU wins 14-10 @ LSU: great game, UGA missed 3 FGs and out gained LSU by several hundred yards. tough loss but still a loss
2003: LSU wins 34-13 @ ATL: better team won convincingly
2004: UGA wins 45-16 @ UGA: better team won convincingly
2005: UGA wins 35-14 @ ATL: UGA roundhouse kicked the #3 team in the country
2008: UGA wins 52-38 @ LSU: UGA went to BR and controlled the game, better team won
2009: LSU wins20-13 @ UGA: controversial to say the least
so you argue you are glad he's back. well in LSU's 3 wins there was one good win and two nail biters, one game which could have gone the other way and some argue should have. meanwhile, in UGA's 3 wins we piss pounded your mighty tigers.
now i am not saying that UGA owns LSU nor have we had the same success this decade, but when you dip shite rantards come over here with the nonsensical "haha richt is back" nonsense i just feel compelled to remind you that LSU is not some god damn enigma that richt has yet to figure out. you have no benefit from richt staying, in fact, it hurts you. why? because now UGA isn't about to deal with a turnover that every team has to deal with when they get a new coach.
so in other words, shut the hell up
here, allow me to go ahead and give my response to your childish rebuttal
LSU is 3-3 vs Mark Richt
2003: LSU wins 14-10 @ LSU: great game, UGA missed 3 FGs and out gained LSU by several hundred yards. tough loss but still a loss
2003: LSU wins 34-13 @ ATL: better team won convincingly
2004: UGA wins 45-16 @ UGA: better team won convincingly
2005: UGA wins 35-14 @ ATL: UGA roundhouse kicked the #3 team in the country
2008: UGA wins 52-38 @ LSU: UGA went to BR and controlled the game, better team won
2009: LSU wins20-13 @ UGA: controversial to say the least
so you argue you are glad he's back. well in LSU's 3 wins there was one good win and two nail biters, one game which could have gone the other way and some argue should have. meanwhile, in UGA's 3 wins we piss pounded your mighty tigers.
now i am not saying that UGA owns LSU nor have we had the same success this decade, but when you dip shite rantards come over here with the nonsensical "haha richt is back" nonsense i just feel compelled to remind you that LSU is not some god damn enigma that richt has yet to figure out. you have no benefit from richt staying, in fact, it hurts you. why? because now UGA isn't about to deal with a turnover that every team has to deal with when they get a new coach.
so in other words, shut the hell up
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:22 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
childish rebuttal
quote:
Turds
Hmmmmmm. Interesting. Very interesting indeed.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:23 pm to ELVIS U
quote:
ELVIS U
tiger rant is calling you home.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:24 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
oh, so you can contine to go .500 vs him? how many of you dip shits do i have to do this too?
here, allow me to go ahead and give my response to your childish rebuttal
LSU is 3-3 vs Mark Richt
2003: LSU wins 14-10 @ LSU: great game, UGA missed 3 FGs and out gained LSU by several hundred yards. tough loss but still a loss
2003: LSU wins 34-13 @ ATL: better team won convincingly
2004: UGA wins 45-16 @ UGA: better team won convincingly
2005: UGA wins 35-14 @ ATL: UGA roundhouse kicked the #3 team in the country
2008: UGA wins 52-38 @ LSU: UGA went to BR and controlled the game, better team won
2009: LSU wins20-13 @ UGA: controversial to say the least
so you argue you are glad he's back. well in LSU's 3 wins there was one good win and two nail biters, one game which could have gone the other way and some argue should have. meanwhile, in UGA's 3 wins we piss pounded your mighty tigers.
now i am not saying that UGA owns LSU nor have we had the same success this decade, but when you dip shite rantards come over here with the nonsensical "haha richt is back" nonsense i just feel compelled to remind you that LSU is not some god damn enigma that richt has yet to figure out. you have no benefit from richt staying, in fact, it hurts you. why? because now UGA isn't about to deal with a turnover that every team has to deal with when they get a new coach.
so in other words, shut the hell up
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:24 pm to roadGator
Should I have gone with asanine?
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:25 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
Asanine
quote:
Turds
Hmmmm.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:26 pm to WG_Dawg
Hail to Georgia down in Dixie!
Our college honored fair and true,
The Red and Black is her standard,
Proudly it waves!
Streaming today and the ages through,
She's the fairest of the Southland,
We'll pledge our love to her for aye,
To that college dear we'll ring a cheer,
All hail to dear old UGA!
source: LINK
Our college honored fair and true,
The Red and Black is her standard,
Proudly it waves!
Streaming today and the ages through,
She's the fairest of the Southland,
We'll pledge our love to her for aye,
To that college dear we'll ring a cheer,
All hail to dear old UGA!
source: LINK
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:27 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
oh, so you can contine to go .500 vs him? how many of you dip shits do i have to do this too?
here, allow me to go ahead and give my response to your childish rebuttal
LSU is 3-3 vs Mark Richt
2003: LSU wins 14-10 @ LSU: great game, UGA missed 3 FGs and out gained LSU by several hundred yards. tough loss but still a loss
2003: LSU wins 34-13 @ ATL: better team won convincingly
2004: UGA wins 45-16 @ UGA: better team won convincingly
2005: UGA wins 35-14 @ ATL: UGA roundhouse kicked the #3 team in the country
2008: UGA wins 52-38 @ LSU: UGA went to BR and controlled the game, better team won
2009: LSU wins20-13 @ UGA: controversial to say the least
so you argue you are glad he's back. well in LSU's 3 wins there was one good win and two nail biters, one game which could have gone the other way and some argue should have. meanwhile, in UGA's 3 wins we piss pounded your mighty tigers.
now i am not saying that UGA owns LSU nor have we had the same success this decade, but when you dip shite rantards come over here with the nonsensical "haha richt is back" nonsense i just feel compelled to remind you that LSU is not some god damn enigma that richt has yet to figure out. you have no benefit from richt staying, in fact, it hurts you. why? because now UGA isn't about to deal with a turnover that every team has to deal with when they get a new coach.
so in other words, shut the hell up
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:27 pm to roadGator
quote:
Road
quote:
Dandy
Hey Kool aid!
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:32 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Nope, still not convinced..beating up Auburn didn't prove a point either.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:32 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Hey Kool aid!
Great game, we're getting there (ain't there yet).
CMR still worries me, though I did see him fired up on the sideline during one play (which was cool, not that I think he needs to lose his shite, rather, I took this as a sign that he starting to take this corchin' thang quasi seriously). I still doubt he's the guy to get us PERENNIALLY OVER THE TOP (where this program ought to be).
2012 player, probably 2013 heavyweight.
Great game, we're getting there (ain't there yet).
CMR still worries me, though I did see him fired up on the sideline during one play (which was cool, not that I think he needs to lose his shite, rather, I took this as a sign that he starting to take this corchin' thang quasi seriously). I still doubt he's the guy to get us PERENNIALLY OVER THE TOP (where this program ought to be).
2012 player, probably 2013 heavyweight.
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:43 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I'm not so sure that we aren't the 3rd best team,
You have Boise St syndrome. Oregon isnt sure that they arent in the class of LSU. Boise, before this weekend wasnt sure that they werent the best in the nation, and Houston isnt sure why one loss teams like Alabama are viewed as better teams than they are.
You only allow yourself to see what you want to believe.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:46 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Is this enough or do we have to wait until we play LSU for people to say if we're good or not?
Maybe, but c'mon man. You're going to get doubters, and rightully so. You've played three ranked teams all year, and are 1-2 in those games. During that 8 game streak, you've played ONE team with a winning record (Auburn6-4),
and that team was throttled by LSU and the flagship.
LSU has played 6 ranked teams all year, and one game was within single digits.
Arkansas has played 4 ranked teams all year, and is 3-1 in them...including beating one of the ranked teams you lost to... by double digits.
Bama has played 4 ranked opponents all year, and are 3-1 with its sole loss to #1 LSU. All of its wins are double digit wins.
I'm not saying that what Georgia has done isn't impressive, but there are atleast three teams in the conference who have done significantly more than that in the same time span. You don't have a true quality win in that span. And even some of the teams you beat (for comparison purposes only) were beaten(by significantly bigger margins)by some of teams mentioned previously.
Now, granted, I just went full rantard, but that is my 2cents.
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:58 pm to WG_Dawg
Niet
Posted on 11/14/11 at 2:59 pm to Rebelgator
So if we end the regular season at 10-2 and win the east, what will we be? Average?
Posted on 11/14/11 at 3:07 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
So if we end the regular season at 10-2 and win the east, what will we be? Average?
Not necessarily, but being able to avoid playing the #1, #3, and #6 teams in the nation don't help your resume. It's not your fault, but I don't understand why you don't expect to have doubters. Your schedule (although not Georgia's fault) is significantly weaker than the rest of the East...which has undoubtedly put you in the position you're in now
Posted on 11/14/11 at 3:14 pm to WG_Dawg
All any of us can prove right now is:
1. Georgia is the best team in the SEC East
2. Mark Richt is 3-3 v. LSU over the last 6 years
3. The SEC champion has won the national championship the last 6 years in a row.
NONE of the points above prove that Georgia is "good" but they certainly don't disprove that Georgia is good or prove that Georgia is bad.
That's about all we can say.
:beatdeadhorse:
Any more evidence one way or another?
1. Georgia is the best team in the SEC East
2. Mark Richt is 3-3 v. LSU over the last 6 years
3. The SEC champion has won the national championship the last 6 years in a row.
NONE of the points above prove that Georgia is "good" but they certainly don't disprove that Georgia is good or prove that Georgia is bad.
That's about all we can say.
:beatdeadhorse:
Any more evidence one way or another?
Posted on 11/14/11 at 3:24 pm to Dandy Lion
yea, i mean i don't want richt fired but i still don't think he's that great. there is still a lot he could do. i mean hell, Georgia aside from AU has still had some real issues. 2012 will be the barometer. he'll get an extension but i don't think everything goes back to normal. everyone will keep a wary eye and we better be in ATL in 2012
Posted on 11/14/11 at 3:27 pm to Damn Good Dawg
I think this "dream team" really saved his a$$...conley, mitchell, crowell, swann, herrera, jon jenkins.
Lord we would be in a world of hurt without those guys.
Lord we would be in a world of hurt without those guys.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News