Started By
Message
SIAP - Interesting SB Nation SEC Division Proposal
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:00 am
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:00 am
SB Nation - SEC Rivalry Focused Divisional Setup
Their main points
1. Every SEC rivalry protected (3 permanent opponents)
2. Every SEC team would play every other SEC team within every two years
3. Schedules end up pretty balanced from a SOS perspective
4. Without true "divisions" the SEC Championship is the two best teams.
Their main points
1. Every SEC rivalry protected (3 permanent opponents)
2. Every SEC team would play every other SEC team within every two years
3. Schedules end up pretty balanced from a SOS perspective
4. Without true "divisions" the SEC Championship is the two best teams.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:03 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
1. Every SEC rivalry protected (3 permanent opponents)
ehh...
Auburn-- Alabama Georgia MSU
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:04 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
ehh... Auburn-- Alabama Georgia MSU
Yea, not everyone's 3 are perfect, but the flip side is you get Tennessee and Florida back pretty frequently.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:07 am to SummerOfGeorge
Makes too much since, they will not do it.
It looks great to me to me though.
It looks great to me to me though.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:07 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Yea, not everyone's 3 are perfect
Alabama's pretty much is - Auburn, Tennessee, LSU
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:08 am to SummerOfGeorge
I personally like this idea. It sucks to have to wait 6-7 years to play a team for a home-and-home.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:12 am to SummerOfGeorge
Aren't divisions required to have a championship game?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:12 am to I-59 Tiger
Awful idea. We'll never allow it.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:12 am to SummerOfGeorge
This is the best format I have seen. Im all for it.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:14 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Aren't divisions required to have a championship game?
Pretty sure the Big XII just created one without divisions didn't they?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:15 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Pretty sure the Big XII just created one without divisions didn't they?
I thought they were making 5 team divisions. Maybe that changed
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:18 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Pretty sure the Big XII just created one without divisions didn't they?
do they have enough teams
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:18 am to Crowknowsbest
Bama would be the only school to face four Big 6 opponents every year. Of course you all like it
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:19 am to NYCAuburn
I know the Big XII is having the title game with 10 teams. I'm not sure if they got a waiver for smaller divisions or got a waiver that they didn't need divisions.
Either way, I'm sure if the SEC decided they wanted to do something like this they would figure out a way to get it done.
Either way, I'm sure if the SEC decided they wanted to do something like this they would figure out a way to get it done.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:19 am to Crowknowsbest
I THINK divisions are no longer required for a championship game. But I still don't like the idea. I'm not sure why.
This post was edited on 6/15/16 at 9:21 am
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:21 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
I know the Big XII is having the title game with 10 teams. I'm not sure if they got a waiver for smaller divisions or got a waiver that they didn't need divisions.
I think their waiver is just having the title game and not enough teams
ETA
quote:
The Division I council adopted a proposal allowing FBS conferences with less than 12 members to hold conference title games between the top two teams in its standings, so long as the conference plays a full round-robin regular-season schedule.
This post was edited on 6/15/16 at 9:23 am
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:23 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
I'm not sure why.
I'd rather keep divisions too. There won't be too many students up for a regular away game played at USCe one weekend, and then another East team the next. Geography has to play a role to keep the students involved.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News