Started By
Message
re: SEC needs to remove two teams, who do you pick to go?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:57 pm to AggieMan2005
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:57 pm to AggieMan2005
Arkansas is tFlagship. Deal with it.
0
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:57 pm to tduecen
Alabama and they can take Auburn with them.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:04 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
Vandy and then one of the MS. schools
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:04 pm to Arksulli
Vanderbilt is only iportant in academics that is why I am keeping A&M over Arkansas.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:05 pm to tduecen
The new guys.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:08 pm to Prof
TAMizzoU.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:11 pm to tduecen
And winning national championships in baseball. Stop looking at them from just a football perspective. They bring Nashville Academics and the occasional national championship in soorts not named football. What other schools bring that much?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:15 pm to tduecen
Texas A&M
Auburn
Auburn
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:18 pm to tduecen
Mizzou and Kentucky are the schools that least fit the profile.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:34 pm to tduecen
quote:
Vanderbilt from the East they can join the big East
Here's how you identify an ignoramus.
Vanderbilt's membership in the conference protects inter-conference correspondence from FOIA requests due to it being a private institution.
Let me be clear.
Vanderbilt is the one school that, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHORT OF LOSING THEIR ACADEMIC ACCREDITATION, can you afford to lose.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:41 pm to CNB
quote:
If the SEC had it's choice today, they wouldn't have a 2nd school in any state.
I beg to differ. we'd keep both Georgia and auburn.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:41 pm to tduecen
Easy.
Mizzou and arkansas
Mizzou and arkansas
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:48 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Back to the original question.
I would remove the Mississippi schools.
1. They are the bottom two academic institutions.
2. They have two of the three smallest stadiums.
3. Between the two schools, they have a combined 58 conference titles in 83 years. To put it in perspective, A&M has 16 titles in FOUR years.
I would remove the Mississippi schools.
1. They are the bottom two academic institutions.
2. They have two of the three smallest stadiums.
3. Between the two schools, they have a combined 58 conference titles in 83 years. To put it in perspective, A&M has 16 titles in FOUR years.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:49 pm to Hailstate8
baseball doesn't mean much... unless you are LSU...
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:54 pm to tduecen
tLandmass schools. Their TV market is small and they don't have national appeal. I would choose Duke and UNC or OU and OSU in a heartbeat over them.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:57 pm to tduecen
You can always tell how far into the offseason we are by the total count on the number of threads created on this exact topic.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:58 pm to kilo
yup- this and the 'which fanbase is most delusional' and the 'who's your favorite player on another team' and 'what's your damn prediction for the 445th time'? 
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:00 pm to jbond
quote:
tLandmass schools. Their TV market is small and they don't have national appeal. I would choose Duke and UNC or OU and OSU in a heartbeat over them.
Ya'll would miss us
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:00 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
SEC needs to remove two teams, who do you pick to go?
Back to the original question.
I would remove the Mississippi schools.
1. They are the bottom two academic institutions.
2. They have two of the three smallest stadiums.
3. Between the two schools, they have a combined 58 conference titles in 83 years. To put it in perspective, A&M has 16 titles in FOUR years.
...and we are just mediocre in those 4 years.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:00 pm to tduecen
quote:
Vanderbilt is only important in academics that is why I am keeping A&M over Arkansas.
Vandy is also important in baseball and women's bowling...
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News