Started By
Message
SEC East football vs SEC West football
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:17 pm
This isn't a troll thread, so back on out if you're coming to respond to it as such. I'm looking for unbiased opinions on this topic, as hard as that can be here sometimes. We're all guilty.
Back to the topic, is it really currently true that the SEC West is a step above in competition compared to the SEC East? Based on the last 15 years or so of SEC East/West championship results, the west seems best. Is it more just an issue of the west being top-heavy currently?
Discuss.
Back to the topic, is it really currently true that the SEC West is a step above in competition compared to the SEC East? Based on the last 15 years or so of SEC East/West championship results, the west seems best. Is it more just an issue of the west being top-heavy currently?
Discuss.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:18 pm to TimTheTiger
Definitely. East was a powerhouse while the West was down years back as well. It's just our turn.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:19 pm to TimTheTiger
quote:
is it really currently true that the SEC West is a step above in competition compared to the SEC East?
yup
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:19 pm to TimTheTiger
quote:
is it really currently true that the SEC West is a step above in competition compared to the SEC East?
Yes
quote:
Based on the last 15 years or so of SEC East/West championship results, the west seems best. Is it more just an issue of the west being top-heavy currently?
I don't know if I would say top-heavy but the teams at the bottom of the West are much better than the ones at the bottom of the East.
It goes in cycles though, East will be back on top eventually.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:20 pm to HDNsGoldenYears211
quote:
yup
Florida beat you by 30
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:21 pm to TimTheTiger
At the moment, Vandy, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Missouri are somewhere between horrible and bad, and the SEC West has Alabama.
So the answer is yes.
So the answer is yes.
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:22 pm to Old Money
The way I see it now, it could very easily flip-flop at any time. Coaching changes, up/down recruiting years based on prior success. Anything can happen.
Texas A&M is a sleeping giant in the West. They could be one great coaching hire away from really gaining their potential.
On the other foot, Florida has access to superb recruit talent in their state, and might be turning in the right direction as well. Not sure Tennessee is really on track like they all think they are, but we'll see.
So many factors and what ifs.
Texas A&M is a sleeping giant in the West. They could be one great coaching hire away from really gaining their potential.
On the other foot, Florida has access to superb recruit talent in their state, and might be turning in the right direction as well. Not sure Tennessee is really on track like they all think they are, but we'll see.
So many factors and what ifs.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:22 pm to texag7
quote:
texag7
Bless your heart
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:23 pm to TimTheTiger
Everything goes thru cycles
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:23 pm to rockiee
Unquestionably. Just like the East was in the Spurrier Fulmer Heyday. I think they are coming back though. I like what Mcelwain is doing at Florida and Smart seems to be a good fit a UGA. Tenn was going in the right direction but who knows what happens now.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:23 pm to rockiee
I am not sure the East will ever be better than the West top to bottom or ever was. I think at one time you had the top of the East, all of the West, and then the bottom of the East and that could happen again. I don't think the bottom 3 or 4 of the West will ever be worse than the bottom 3 or 4 of the East.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:26 pm to 18mph
quote:
I don't think the bottom 3 or 4 of the West will ever be worse than the bottom 3 or 4 of the East.
I could see that but a just average bottom west could swing the power back to the East. That wouldn't be for at least another 5-10 years.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:27 pm to 18mph
The East in 2007 was pretty damn strong with UGA, UF, Tennessee, Kentucky, and South Carolina all having really good teams.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:30 pm to texag7
texag7 is a dumbass. Thread is about top to bottom. not one game in a season. How did it feel getting beat two years in a row by a team that lost to a East team by 30
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:32 pm to TimTheTiger
problem is the east has vandy and kenucky, non football schools
When "east was so good" , really, it was only spurrier florida and Tennessee.
When "east was so good" , really, it was only spurrier florida and Tennessee.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:35 pm to Old Money
It's cyclical. When Spurrier and Fulmer were in the east and the Mike Dubose's, Ed Orgerons, Jackie Sherrill's, Gerry DiNardo, Terry Bowden's and Danny Fords were in the west it was an east beat down in regular season and SECCG.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:35 pm to TimTheTiger
Alabama >>>>> Florida
Ole Miss = Tennessee
Arkansas <<<< Georgia
LSU >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vanderbilt
Texas AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kentucky
Mississippi State >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Missouri
Auburn >>>>>>> South Carolina
Ole Miss = Tennessee
Arkansas <<<< Georgia
LSU >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vanderbilt
Texas AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kentucky
Mississippi State >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Missouri
Auburn >>>>>>> South Carolina
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:39 pm to TimTheTiger
quote:
Texas A&M is a sleeping giant in the West. They could be one great coaching hire away from really gaining their potential.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:40 pm to TimTheTiger
The East always have Kentucky and Vanderbilt, so the rest have to pick it up. Florida and Tennessee and somewhat Georgia did over the years from 92 to 09.
But since, those top 2 have slipped, where the West anchors of Ole Miss and State gave improved.
But since, those top 2 have slipped, where the West anchors of Ole Miss and State gave improved.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News