Started By
Message

re: SEC Creep... its up to us to stop it

Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2089 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:23 pm to
Clemson would be a 1 loss team in the east.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:44 pm to
Give me FSU and bring back Georgia Tech to the fold.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

SEC
All of y'all can get bent.

LSU is the only team that matters.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23921 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Clemson would be very competitive in the SEC East.


Spurrier begs to differ... #HighFive
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26174 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Clemson wouldn't. not for the last five years anyway.


Hasn't Carolina beaten the winner of the east the last 3 years?
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26174 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

bring back Georgia Tech to the fold.


Why don't we just add Suwanee while we're at it?
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

VA Tech

frick that, they act like they have the football history of Bama, when Ole Miss looks down on them.
Eta: if we are going to add Duke and UNC basketball fans, why not add Duke and UNC.
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 10:07 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23921 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Hasn't Carolina beaten the winner of the east the last 3 years?


Yes.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23921 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

quote:

VA Tech



quote:

frick that, they act like they have the football history of Bama, when Ole Miss looks down on them.
Eta: if we are going to add Duke and UNC basketball fans, why not add Duke and UNC.


Because Duke and UNC don't bring the lucrative DC TV market.
Posted by TigersGeaux22
Tampa, FL
Member since Sep 2013
94 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:26 pm to
This post is bad and you should feel bad

Conference pride doesn't matter. LSU


UGA


The rest of y'all can get used every week and I'd be happy
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 11:30 pm
Posted by PanhandleDawg
Navarre Beach, FL
Member since Mar 2011
5444 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

This. IF we went to 16, I want FSU and VA Tech


Hell to the yes!!
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

Because Duke and UNC don't bring the lucrative DC TV market.

Yea, but NC has more people than DC. To go along with a much larger percentage caring about either of those 2 schools than DC cares about VA Tech. Not to mention, I'm sure they'll be shite again after Beamer leaves. Already headed in that direction.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
5986 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 12:20 am to
quote:

Talent wise they would be #2 in the west


Mother effin bama fans..
If only you got points on the scoreboard for your recruiting rankings, AMIRITE?
Instead.. Auburn beat Bama. FSU beat Auburn.. so talent wise.. they (FSU) would be #1.. tied with LSU of course.. who also beat Auburn.
But then again Ole Miss beat LSU.. and Miss. State beat Ole Miss.
Since Miss. State was 6th in the SEC West.. I guess.. that means... you have to play the F'n game and live with the consequences.

Talent = potential.. Results = Reality.. I could've been the f'n president.. but I didn't take advantage of my "talent".. Good thing, cause my first act would've been collecting and emailing all of the bama and Auburn fans that have email addresses, telling them to evacuate, and bombing the state. but then I'd be impeached for killing 92 percent of the state of Alabama.
WORTH IT!

Trolls aside.
FSU and Clemson would be great, competitive additions.
FSU and UNC would probably be the choices should we expand, again.
Posted by Retrograde
TX
Member since Jul 2014
2900 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 1:14 am to
Who gives a shite about what two teams that have had good years but belong to a vastly inferior conference think. The SEC is the dragon on top of the mountain, and until someone else can have prolonged success that will not change.
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
22925 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 2:28 am to
This is Auburn's fault, you lost to both of them recently.
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26174 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 4:36 am to
quote:

Yes


Then your point about them not being able to challenge for the east bc South Carolina beats them is meaningless.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58913 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Clemson and FSU would be very competitive in the SEC East.


Monticello also said:
Clemson has beaten Auburn, LSU, and UGA since 2012.

It would appear as if they would contend for the SEC West, as well.
Posted by VVega
Alabama
Member since Sep 2013
5770 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 6:29 am to
EXTRA EXTRA: Passionate football schools in the South have SUCCESS! Read all about it!
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 6:31 am to
We should trade USC for Clemson.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 6:32 am to
quote:

We should trade USC for Clemson.




Agreed. They're at least a respectable football program, historically.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter