Started By
Message
re: Sample East/West Realignment after 2013 season?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:46 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:46 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
You can't get rid of the TSiO, then UT would be begging for a rival like LSU.
The numbers are already pretty tenuous. Adding two more members will make it logistically difficult and probably bust the coalition for POs. Just the facts.
1
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:47 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Oklahoma and Oklahoma State. It's happening
No. No it's not.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:49 pm to therick711
quote:
The numbers are already pretty tenuous. Adding two more members will make it logistically difficult and probably bust the coalition for POs. Just the facts.
Sounds like someone wants to stop playing UF annually.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:50 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
Sounds like someone wants to stop playing UF annually.
quote:
USMC Gators
You obviously can't read. Also, you aren't even a funny or smart troll. You're just kind of dumb
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:51 pm to Chd1478
Two 13 team super-conferences with no out-of-conference play. Everybody plays each of the other 12 teams
WEST Conference
USC
Oregon
Stanford
Texas
Oklahoma
Alabama
LSU
A&M
Nebraska
Kansas State
Texas Tech
TCU
Oklahoma State
EAST Conference
Florida
Georgia
Ohio State
Michigan
Florida State
Miami
Notre Dame
Virginia Tech
Clemson
South Carolina
Michigan State
Tennessee
WEST Conference
USC
Oregon
Stanford
Texas
Oklahoma
Alabama
LSU
A&M
Nebraska
Kansas State
Texas Tech
TCU
Oklahoma State
EAST Conference
Florida
Georgia
Ohio State
Michigan
Florida State
Miami
Notre Dame
Virginia Tech
Clemson
South Carolina
Michigan State
Tennessee
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:54 pm to MrTide33
one of those conferences is considerably and consistently stronger than the other there man
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:55 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
The national one or the SEC one? I purposely did the SEC that way. I just did the national one geographically
I purposely did the SEC that way. I just did the national one geographicallyPosted on 11/13/12 at 2:55 pm to therick711
quote:
You obviously can't read. Also, you aren't even a funny or smart troll. You're just kind of dumb
Yet you keep feeding.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:55 pm to graychef
NCAA SHOULD AMEND THE REQUIREMENT OF CONF CHAMPIONSHIPS REQUIRING DIVISIONS...
AND CHANGE SO THAT ALL FOOTBALL CONFERENCES MUST BE A MIN OF 10 TEAMS, AND ALL LEAGUES MUST PLAY 9 CONF GAMES WITH THE 2 BEST RECORDS PLAYING THE FIRST THUR - SAT FOLLOWING THE REGULAR SEASON ENDING.
---EACH CONF COULD THEN REGULATE HOW MANY TRADITIONAL RIVALRIES WOULD BE KEPT..
UGA - AU & UF
UA - AU & UT
UF - UGA & ???
ETC ETC
AND CHANGE SO THAT ALL FOOTBALL CONFERENCES MUST BE A MIN OF 10 TEAMS, AND ALL LEAGUES MUST PLAY 9 CONF GAMES WITH THE 2 BEST RECORDS PLAYING THE FIRST THUR - SAT FOLLOWING THE REGULAR SEASON ENDING.
---EACH CONF COULD THEN REGULATE HOW MANY TRADITIONAL RIVALRIES WOULD BE KEPT..
UGA - AU & UF
UA - AU & UT
UF - UGA & ???
ETC ETC
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:56 pm to MrTide33
quote:
EAST Conference
Wouldnt lose a MNC ever
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:57 pm to Choupique19
quote:The thing is, the schedule now is random and we got "lucky" to get teams on down years. We weren't bitching 3 years ago when we played Bama and LSU in the same year.
Well congrats on your cupcake schedule that landed you in Atlanta two years in a row even after South Carolina has spanked that arse.
No Bama, no LSU, no Arky/A&M = winning the schedule lottery and undeservedly making Atlanta two years in a row.
LSU fans want to be in a division where they are the only power.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:02 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
EAST Conference Wouldnt lose a MNC ever
Actually, in the BCS era, 7 National Championships were won by WEST conference teams, 6 by EAST conference teams, and 1 by a team left out of the two conferences (Auburn)
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:05 pm to MrTide33
Furthermore, in East West matchups, the conferences are split, each having 2 wins and 2 losses
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:05 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
The thing is, the schedule now is random and we got "lucky" to get teams on down years.
that's the thing, it isn't
the last two years have been "temporary" schedules that they could have scheduled however they wanted
Georiga and Alabama were supposed to play this year and it magically got swapped to Missouri...fine, guess they just pushed it back a year. Wrong, now its LSU vs Georgia and Alabama vs Kentucky
But if you want to call it "luck" and "random", then fine...but LSU got screwed and Alabama got really "lucky" with these two random schedules. I don't think its a conspiracy or anything, but it's still bullshite and everyone knows it.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:08 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Actually, I'd be in favor of this. I'd rather be with other traditional SEC schools than the Miss schools and
I mean, the miss schools were original members. Doesn't get much more traditional than that. Traditional powerhouses they are not if that's what you meant
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:11 pm to MrTide33
quote:
Furthermore, in East West matchups, the conferences are split, each having 2 wins and 2 losses
Yea, which further proves why Alabama and Georgia had a much easier path to Atlanta than other SEC teams
This year, LSU has played SEC East teams that are 9-1 and 8-2. Neither team has lost out of conference.
Bama, on the other hand has gotten to play 5 and 6 in the SEC East. Combined record, 9-11 (UT and Mizzou). To make matters worse, next year they get 6 and 7, both with new coaches. LSU gets 1 and 2 in the East.
LSU has played four teams currently in the top ten, and has a 2-2 record. Alabama has the same winning percentage against teams in the top ten, going 1-1.
I am not upset about it and you can only just line up and play who you are scheduled to play, but there certainly isn't a balance or fairness in the schedules. And the schedulers could have done whatever they wanted the last two years...
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:12 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Yea, which further proves why Alabama and Georgia had a much easier path to Atlanta than other SEC teams
This year, LSU has played SEC East teams that are 9-1 and 8-2. Neither team has lost out of conference.
Bama, on the other hand has gotten to play 5 and 6 in the SEC East. Combined record, 9-11 (UT and Mizzou). To make matters worse, next year they get 6 and 7, both with new coaches. LSU gets 1 and 2 in the East.
More importantly Johnny Football gets Vandy and Mizzou!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:13 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Yea, which further proves why Alabama and Georgia had a much easier path to Atlanta than other SEC teams This year, LSU has played SEC East teams that are 9-1 and 8-2. Neither team has lost out of conference. Bama, on the other hand has gotten to play 5 and 6 in the SEC East. Combined record, 9-11 (UT and Mizzou). To make matters worse, next year they get 6 and 7, both with new coaches. LSU gets 1 and 2 in the East. LSU has played four teams currently in the top ten, and has a 2-2 record. Alabama has the same winning percentage against teams in the top ten, going 1-1.
Sorry y'all got the short straw.
We'll get it one year when we're good and see what happens. Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:15 pm to MrTide33
quote:
We'll get it one year when we're good and see what happens.
We already know what happens. Yall got the "short end of the straw" in 2010 with bye weeks...but Saban bitched enough and the SEC made a new rule about it
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:17 pm to Eighteen
quote:
I am not upset about it and you can only just line up and play who you are scheduled to play, but there certainly isn't a balance or fairness in the schedules. And the schedulers could have done whatever they wanted the last two years...
Our schedule looked pretty decent at the beginning of they year. Michigan, Arkansas, LSU, and Mississippi State. Plus there's always surprise teams like A&M. That's just how the cards fell
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News