Started By
Message

re: Roommate Switch Proposal - SEC Schedule Fix it Thread

Posted on 3/13/14 at 11:19 am to
Posted by Nicolae
Member since Dec 2012
1880 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 11:19 am to
Been around for a while and is hands down the best possible scheduling arrangement for 14 teams. No other proposal is even close to how good this system is. It is the Ferrari of scheduling while what we are currently riding around in (along with the 6-??? proposals) is a '78 Fiat Strada.

Also scales to 16 very easily, so if we were to again expanded, it would not have to be scrapped.
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 11:44 am
Posted by Nicolae
Member since Dec 2012
1880 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I get it I just wish it allowed for more consistency? No more annual Grindmas or LSU vs Auburn? Also, you can't deny Gus the chance to sink Bert's fat arse on a yearly basis


Who really cares? When it gets down to it, the DSOR is the only one that really matters. WLOCP, IB and TSIO are next up in importance and all are preserved if I'm not mistaken. All the rest can be scrapped and nobody is really going to give a rat's arse.
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 11:44 am
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36107 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Been around for a while and is hands down the best possible scheduling arrangement for 14 teams. No other proposal is even close to how good this system is. It is the Ferrari of scheduling while what we are currently riding around in (along with the 6-??? proposals) is a '78 Fiat Strada.

Also scales to 16 very easily, so if we were to again expanded, it would not have to be scrapped.



16 teams would be a very mixed blessing because of how it would stretch out the rotation. I think the roommate switch proposal would still be a better option than two eight team divisions playing either a 7-1 or 7-1-1 or 7-2 rotation - options which would take an inordinately long time (14 years, 12 years, about eight years) to rotate through every single SEC opponent just once for a home and away.

If you had four team pods I suspect what would work best would be something like a 3-1-4 rotation but it would be complicated by the fixed opponents required because of historical rivalries and balancing the schedule (lining up not only relatively equal strength between pods but also making sure as best you can that the permanent out of pod matchups are also teams of relatively equal strength). The four rotating teams would obviously have to include all of another pod but it would be a little messy because some years the paired pods aligned into a division would include the "out of pod" permanent rivalry games for some opponents.

The teams making up the pods would also be an interesting problem to figure out. Assuming teams from North Carolina and Virginia are going to be the additions you'll end up with something like:

Years 1/2:
Division 1 = Pod 1 + Pod 2
Division 2 = Pod 3 + Pod 4
Years 3/4
Division 1 = Pod 1 + Pod 3
Division 2 = Pod 2 + Pod 4
Years 5/6
Division 1 = Pod 1 + Pod 4
Division 2 = Pod 2 + Pod 3

Pod 1:
LSU (Fla)
A&M (Va team)
Arky (MU)
Ole Miss (MSU)

Pod 2:
Alabama (Tenn)
Auburn (UGA)
MU (Arky)
MSU (Ole Miss)

Pod 3:
Tenn (Bama)
NC team (USC)
Va team (A&M)
Vandy (KY)

Pod 4:
Fla (LSU)
UGA (Auburn)
USC (NC team)
KY (KY)
Posted by All4Qtrs
tCapitol
Member since Nov 2013
1056 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 3:07 pm to
Or you could get rid of all OOC and play a 13 game schedule...
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36107 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Or you could get rid of all OOC and play a 13 game schedule...


I hear proposals like that and think the person saying it must be joking.

There's no advantage to that even if the NCAA were to increase the number of regular season games allowed from 12 to 13. You'd lose every single interesting out of conference game - games like Florida/FSU, USC/Clemson, UGA/Ga Tech that are part of college footballs rivalries.

You'd also lose more money since you'd lose home gate revenues and you'd end up with fewer bowl eligible teams - losing the extra practices between regular season and bowl season. IMO a 13 game round robin offers no real advantage when it comes to declaring a conference champ anyway since there would inevitably be more two, three, or even four or more way ties for the championship.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter