Started By
Message
Regarding vacated wins, etc
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:18 pm
IDGAF about money, autographs, etc.
My question is hypothetical: Let's imagine that aTm plays Manziel in the first 6 SEC games, and further let's hypothetically say they win all of those games. Then NCAA whams them with "vacated" wins nonsense.
What is their SEC record if they win the last 2 games? 2-0?
Are the "losses" vacated for other teams?
Could a team with "vacated" wins play in SECCG with a record of 2-0?
My question is hypothetical: Let's imagine that aTm plays Manziel in the first 6 SEC games, and further let's hypothetically say they win all of those games. Then NCAA whams them with "vacated" wins nonsense.
What is their SEC record if they win the last 2 games? 2-0?
Are the "losses" vacated for other teams?
Could a team with "vacated" wins play in SECCG with a record of 2-0?
5
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:20 pm to makersmark1
Would they have them vacate the wins while the season is in progress? I don't remember that ever happening, but I could be wrong.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:21 pm to makersmark1
The team that loses to a team that vacates games still has that game counted as a loss.
No they would not play the SECCG with a 2-0 record.
ETA - forgot the loss part - losses aren't vacated - they're still counted as losses.
No they would not play the SECCG with a 2-0 record.
ETA - forgot the loss part - losses aren't vacated - they're still counted as losses.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:22 pm to makersmark1
Can't vacate losses
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:24 pm to stat19
quote:
No they would not play the SECCG with a 2-0 record.
So they would have a higher winning % than all other teams?
Please explain how the selection of west rep would work if not winning % ?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:27 pm to makersmark1
quote:
So they would have a higher winning % than all other teams?
Doesn't go by winning percentage..
Their SEC record would be 2-0, so the teams that have more than 2 SEC wins would be higher in the pecking order.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:28 pm to makersmark1
quote:
So they would have a higher winning % than all other teams?
Please explain how the selection of west rep would work if not winning % ?
Does the SEC tiebreaker schedule not include NCAA sanctions and vacated wins? That seems like a dumb decision on their part given that Auburn is a member.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:31 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
so the teams that have more than 2 SEC wins would be higher in the pecking order.
So everyone but arkansas.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:32 pm to betweenthebara
Look at the recruiting rankings. The NCAA ain't doing nothing these days so just shut up about it.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:48 pm to makersmark1
quote:
makersmark1
You should direct this question to Alabama fans since vacated wins are their area of expertise.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:52 pm to BradPitt
This hypothetical situation will likely never happen, but if losses are not vacated the undefeated team with vacated wins would be at the top of the standings by winning %
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:55 pm to makersmark1
quote:
but if losses are not vacated the undefeated team with vacated wins would be at the top of the standings by winning %
Wins are vacated, losses aren't. If aTm plays manziel for 6 games, then he is ruled ineligible, their conference record will be 0-0 after 6 games. If they win their last 2 SEC games without manziel, their record would 2-0. However, there are other teams in the west who would have accumulated 6,7, or even 8 SEC wins, and would win the division. It's not based on winning percentage, like multiple people have told you.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:10 pm to makersmark1
I don't know why they ever decided vacated wins a good idea. A vacated win should be a loss and a win for the losing team. That's proper payment for cheating.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:12 pm to BradPitt
Does anyone even get close to Alabama? I know they have at least 29 wins vacated.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:14 pm to BradPitt
quote:
BradPitt
It must be frustrating being unable to converse with other adults when all you can do spew childish drivel.
Posted on 8/28/13 at 1:31 pm to makersmark1
When sanctions are leveled on a team, the conference also vacates any championship won. If it happened in season, they would exclude that team from being able to win the championship.
For the record, it's not true that losses never get vacated, but it would not be vacated in this case.
For the record, it's not true that losses never get vacated, but it would not be vacated in this case.
Posted on 8/28/13 at 1:40 pm to stat19
quote:
It must be frustrating being unable to converse with other adults when all you can do spew childish drivel.
You may be older and more mature than I, but I bet my penis is much more larger than your penis.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News