Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:16 am to CNB
South Carolina has a terrible defense and offense with no talent, went 3-9 last year, and hired Muschamp yet somehow will be better than a team that finished 5-7 last year despite having a defense ranked in the top 10 nationally which btw, is returning all but 3 starters from last season. South Carolina fan logic. 
This post was edited on 8/14/16 at 10:17 am
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:17 am to TigerTalker16
You're bragging about a 5 win season right now 
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:18 am to CNB
5-7 is pretty good for a team that scored 4 offensive touchdowns total in conference play.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:19 am to TigerTalker16
Holy shite 4 offensive touchdowns?
Mizzou might finish last in the SEC
Mizzou might finish last in the SEC
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:21 am to TigerTalker16
Holy shite I didn't realize Mizzou's offense was that bad.
4 offensive TDS in 8 conference games?
4 offensive TDS in 8 conference games?
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:22 am to Mizz-SEC
1. MIZZOU
2. USC
3. MSU
4. A&M
Based on Strength of Schedule. Everybody seems to point out the difficulty in A&M's SoS at the beginning of the year, but then A&M starts out better than expected and they forget.
Then after the season is over, everyone is saying that A&M has "underperformed". It is the strangest phenomena I have ever seen. People can't really be this stupid, but then again we are all getting most of our football information from an "analyst" named Booger.
2. USC
3. MSU
4. A&M
Based on Strength of Schedule. Everybody seems to point out the difficulty in A&M's SoS at the beginning of the year, but then A&M starts out better than expected and they forget.
Then after the season is over, everyone is saying that A&M has "underperformed". It is the strangest phenomena I have ever seen. People can't really be this stupid, but then again we are all getting most of our football information from an "analyst" named Booger.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:23 am to CNB
Nah, bruh. We actually have an offensive coordinator who doesn't have shite for brains now and brought in some quality transfers on the offensive side of the ball from OU and Bama.
Mizzou stacked, SEC fricked!
Mizzou stacked, SEC fricked!
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:23 am to UFFan
quote:
Holy shite I didn't realize Mizzou's offense was that bad.
4 offensive TDS in 8 conference games?
Yep, go look it up. We ranked dead last in total offense for teams in a power 5 conference. Mizzou hadn't had an offense that bad since the 1930's
This post was edited on 8/14/16 at 10:26 am
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:24 am to TigerTalker16
Maybe y'all will get to 6 offensive touchdowns this year 
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:29 am to CNB
Well, even if our offense was as bad as last year we would still beat South Carolina. It worked last time. 
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:32 am to TigerTalker16
Your offense last year = our defense last year
I'm honestly excited to see what our defense can do. We weren't all that bad on offense last year and other than the loss of Cooper, we aren't too bad on that side of the ball.
Defense is what killed us. And what might kill us again this year.
I'm honestly excited to see what our defense can do. We weren't all that bad on offense last year and other than the loss of Cooper, we aren't too bad on that side of the ball.
Defense is what killed us. And what might kill us again this year.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:39 am to danfraz
This board is going to be the greatest place ever when we beat LSU.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:39 am to JesusQuintana
I actually hope y'all do. That would be very entertaining.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:40 am to CNB
quote:
Defense is what killed us. And what might kill us again this year.
I didn't watch that many USCe games last year but from what I saw there was talent there. Unfortunately y'all were frequently out of position.
In the Citadel game (not trolling its just the last USCe game I watched online) your defense would make a solid play and then, the very next play, look completely confused and out of position. Obviously the Citadel drags out an offense that can be a nightmare to prepare for but it didn't seem like your DC made a single adjustment the entire game.
I think USCe has better talent on defense then people think they do. Its a question of having them prepared and in the right place at the right time.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:43 am to Arksulli
Lorenzo Ward and John Hoke were awful. I don't have the link to it but if you read where the coaches speak about teams anonymously, you can see where they were making fun of how badly positioned we always were and how we had a scheme that worked against our personnel, not for.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:43 am to Arksulli
quote:
In the Citadel game (not trolling its just the last USCe game I watched online)
Gosh, Arksulli. All you do is troll South Carolina about the Citadel loss you meanie.
Posted on 8/14/16 at 10:44 am to CNB
Found it:
quote:
“Defensively, their scheme made no sense because it put their linebackers in coverage way more than they could handle. Muschamp will go in there and give their guys a plan they can actually execute, but you’ve got to have corners who can play man-to-man in his scheme to make it work. That will be key for them if those guys can step up and whether they can tackle better.”
Posted on 8/14/16 at 11:00 am to CNB
You allow for USC to be "improved" in your logic but think Mizzou's offense will be the same or worse than last year.
Which Mizzou poster got you all worked up man? I do like how you threw aTm and MSU in there to try and hide the fact this is thread is really:
Which team will be better, South Carolina or Mizzou?
Which Mizzou poster got you all worked up man? I do like how you threw aTm and MSU in there to try and hide the fact this is thread is really:
Which team will be better, South Carolina or Mizzou?
Posted on 8/14/16 at 11:02 am to kilo
Bruh I literally said nothing bad about Mizzou except for thinking my team will be better until TT16 came in firing shots 
Notice anyone else ranking Mizzou above SC I didn't say shite to. TT16 just has an obsession for cocks man. He thinks it bothers us
I have no idea who will be better. I don't see why it's that egregious that I believe my team will be better, just like I don't find it egregious that you think Mizzou will be better.
To answer your question, I think my team will be better just like you think yours will be better. I won't be surprised if either team comes out on top.
Don't be so sensitive.
Notice anyone else ranking Mizzou above SC I didn't say shite to. TT16 just has an obsession for cocks man. He thinks it bothers us
I have no idea who will be better. I don't see why it's that egregious that I believe my team will be better, just like I don't find it egregious that you think Mizzou will be better.
To answer your question, I think my team will be better just like you think yours will be better. I won't be surprised if either team comes out on top.
Don't be so sensitive.
This post was edited on 8/14/16 at 11:05 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News