Started By
Message

re: Prescott voted better than Bo

Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:31 pm to
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:31 pm to
Skewing the frick out of some numbers now, are we, Henry?

Conveniently ignored rushing numbers huh? Also the fact that Dak only played half of the LSU game and missed a quarter of the aTm game when he went down with injury.

A guy that started 9 games for us accounted for more TDs than your 13 game starter. Skew away.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 6:33 pm
Posted by bullpup01
Utopia
Member since Jan 2013
566 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Did your father provoke this thread HJJ?


Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68487 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Conveniently ignored rushing numbers huh?

Skewing? I made a reference to the rushing numbers. Against, Auburn, yeah that gave him the better game. The other common opponents, no.
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Bo has about 70 and a touchdown as well. Nothing special.


LOL no


Shitty troll is shitty
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68487 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Shitty troll is shitty

2012 dumbass.

ETA: He has 1 reception for 25 yards and a touchdown.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 6:36 pm
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:43 pm to
I obviously vote Bo.
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Skewing? I made a reference to the rushing numbers. Against, Auburn, yeah that gave him the better game. The other common opponents, no.

Yeah -- you made reference to something you completely ignored in the actual numbers that you posted.
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

2012 dumbass.

ETA: He has 1 reception for 25 yards and a touchdown.


Why are you quoting shite that Wallace did in 2012? What the frick relevance does that have to a discussion about this year?
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68487 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Why are you quoting shite that Wallace did in 2012? What the frick relevance does that have to a discussion about this year?


Just saying that he has done it before. That it's nothing special.

Dak = Better runner

Bo = Better passer
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Just saying that he has done it before. That it's nothing special.


Dak's production is relevant to this season's output. Bo's aren't.

quote:

Dak = Better runner

Bo = Better passer

It's bullshite to even try to compare them at this point. Dak's receiving corps had a COMBINED 2 starts prior to this season.

Let's see where we are next year when Dak returns every single receiver and TE -- while OM loses 50% of your total production at the position.

I have a feeling -- as does literally everyone on this website that isn't an OM fan -- that this discussion will be a thing of total ridiculousness going forward.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 6:54 pm
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

as does literally everyone on this website that isn't an OM fan


Using this fricking message board as any sort of justification of the legitimacy of any argument is laughable.

Also, this is classic argumentum ad populum.

engie pls stahp with the logical fallacies bro
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 6:58 pm
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 7:01 pm to
Better than Bo WALLACE? Possibly.

Better than Bo JACKSON? NFW EVER.
Posted by jeffturnright
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
453 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 7:23 pm to
[quote]Off the field, Dak could physically rape Bo. Not metaphorically either. He could literally hold Bo down and cum in him against his will.

That actually almost made me fall out of my chair when i pictured that.

Posted by spacecataz
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2010
203 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I think it has a lot to do with people's perception of the player. Dak is a model of what a leader should be. Bo, not so much.


Plus Bo is the poster child of every dude associated with OM; it's hard to tell if he's a dude or a chick. That's definitely not a good leadership quality.
Posted by DiafGtfo
Member since Nov 2010
1894 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:00 pm to
Surprising. I would have picked Bo Wallace. Dak Prescott isn't bad, but I'd still take Bo Wallace, especially considering the performance of the teams this season.
Posted by InstiGator Greg
Member since Nov 2013
90 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 10:27 am to
Let's do a blind taste test.

EXHIBIT A
PASSING
156-267 58.4% 1940 yards passing 10 TD passes 7 INT 8 sacks ADJ QBR 82.8
RUSHING
134 attempts 829 yards 6.2 yards per attempt 13 TD

EXHIBIT B
PASSING
283-437 64.8% 3346 yards passing 18 TD passes 10 INT 24 sacks ADJ QBR 72.9
RUSHING
131 attempts 355 yards 2.7 per attempt 6 TD

I'm going to go with Exhibit A.
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Y'all have a couple future NFL wideouts. We have future MS high school coaches.


Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73474 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 10:39 am to
Maybe Bo Scarborough
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter