Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:14 pm to Louie T
quote:
that's a completely different situation
Do tell.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:17 pm to Teague
a receiver can't go out of bounds and then come back in and be the first to touch it
regardless of whether he touched it first, he was still in the air when he touched it. therefore, he was in bounds
regardless of whether he touched it first, he was still in the air when he touched it. therefore, he was in bounds
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:24 pm to Louie T
quote:
regardless of whether he touched it first, he was still in the air when he touched it
It was VERY close. Maybe he was in the air and maybe he wasn't. It depends on when you award possession to Peterson. My point is, the call wasn't nearly as bad as everyone is trying to make out.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:25 pm to Teague
quote:it doesn't matter when peterson gets possession. if just matters if jones was touching out of bounds when he was touching the ball; which he wasn't
It depends on when you award possession to Peterson.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:25 pm to Golfer
quote:
Watch it again...
0:45 mark
Good point, and you're correct. Hadn't seen that angle, yet.
I watched it from another angle, though. And while he was in the air when he first touched it, it looked like he was still touching it when his right foot landed out of bounds. It was really close.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:29 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
And while he was in the air when he first touched it, it looked like he was still touching it when his right foot landed out of bounds. It was really close.
This.
So, yes, it does matter when Peterson was awarded possession.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:30 pm to Teague
quote:you're believing that because you are a bama fan just like some lsu fans believe the game was rigged. doesn't mean you're right
This.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:32 pm to Louie T
B
The ref would have explained the call if it was not overturned because JJones was out of bounds and touched the ball; especially since it was blatantly obvious that it was picked and would be questioned. The only conceivable reason for the call was that every angle wasn’t reviewed, which makes no sense.
The ref would have explained the call if it was not overturned because JJones was out of bounds and touched the ball; especially since it was blatantly obvious that it was picked and would be questioned. The only conceivable reason for the call was that every angle wasn’t reviewed, which makes no sense.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:32 pm to Louie T
quote:
you're believing that because you are a bama fan just like some lsu fans believe the game was rigged. doesn't mean you're right
I'm believing it because I watched the damn replay 10 times. It happened. I said the call was very close. It's LSU fans who won't believe anything except they were cheated.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:34 pm to Teague
quote:
I'm believing it because I watched the damn replay 10 times. It happened.
ok you said it so it's true i've seen the replay 100 times and i think it was a pick
quote:it's idiot lsu fans who feel the game was given to them
It's LSU fans who won't believe anything except they were cheated.
however, our chance of making a comeback were greatly diminished by that call
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:36 pm to UPT
quote:
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:39 pm to Louie T
quote:
I'm believing it because I watched the damn replay 10 times. It happened.
ok you said it so it's true
i've seen the replay 100 times and i think it was a pick
This is what I'm referring to when I say, "I saw it":
quote:
And while he was in the air when he first touched it, it looked like he was still touching it when his right foot landed out of bounds. It was really close.
It's not true because I said it, it's true because it happened. That doesn't mean it was or was not a pick, but it does mean that it was questionable.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:40 pm to UPT
I think the ref was blocked an never saw the play and I think the replay guy definitely blew it. I would be hard pressed to intelligently argue the refs favor Bama based solely on 1 game. But, look at all the big games Bama has won the last 2 years and the close calls for Bama. First I can recall offhand was Ole Miss last year. Bama seems to consistently lead the league in least penalties AND in most penalties against opponents. That's pretty dang freaky at best.
But, I think it is unfair to dwell too long on the penalties. LSU and most schools know going in that you have to beat Bama solidly to win at BD. Bama played a VERY good game and looked good after the bye. No one knows if LSU would have won if the bad calls had not happened.
But, I think it is unfair to dwell too long on the penalties. LSU and most schools know going in that you have to beat Bama solidly to win at BD. Bama played a VERY good game and looked good after the bye. No one knows if LSU would have won if the bad calls had not happened.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:41 pm to Teague
quote:no you've said a few times that you were right and others were wrong
That doesn't mean it was or was not a pick, but it does mean that it was questionable.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:46 pm to Monk
quote:
Bama seems to consistently lead the league in least penalties AND in most penalties against opponents. That's pretty dang freaky at best.
False. That's just other fans talking.
Here's the facts:
Penalties
Bama 6th with 51. That's right in the middle of the pack.
Penalties for opponents
Bama 5th with 60.
LINK
Posted on 11/8/09 at 9:59 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
B
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:02 pm to UPT
quote:
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:04 pm to TG
Please Teague, links with actual facts are very annoying/confusing on this board. 
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News