Started By
Message
re: Phil Steele's mag is out
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:24 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:24 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Bolden is very good but problems at quarterback are going to make stacking the box against them an easy call and may limit his productivity.
agreed.
0
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:24 pm to adammwilson
quote:
he might and it would shock no one but that just means he can play in a system and doesn't necessarily make him a great player.
oh...so we are evaluating for the NFL...gotcha
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:25 pm to adammwilson
Have you started drinking early today adam?
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:25 pm to sugatowng
quote:
I think many believe Wilson will be the top guy based on Petrino's offense...This is nothing new in his offense if you haven't noticed...Hell even Casey Dick put up 2800 in a losing season and 6 months on the Petrino job...
So Davis, who was the leading rb rusher has no chance to repeat that? Hell he hardly played the first 4 games of the season...
Ya'll mad....
Enough with the deflection "you mad" shite.
Moving on, Davis is a great player but I do wonder how inexperience at offensive line will effect the overall offense. No doubt Wilson is talented and knows a proven system, combined with the best receivers in maybe the nation, and it's easy to jump to a conclusion like that. However, the offensive line is a huge problem that many undervalue.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:26 pm to sugatowng
quote:
oh...so we are evaluating for the NFL...gotcha
what made you think of the nfl. I'm talking about in relation to other college players in the conference. It's not all about numbers. 
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:26 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
no I agree Bolden is more talented but based on depth idk. I don't remember being particularly impressed with any rb but Bolden
Ask LSU or Auburn fans about Jeff Scott. And Enrique is bigger and faster than BB. He just isnt as good a pass blocker, doesnt have as good of hands, or vision. Kinda like the difference between Richardson and Ingram. We have a poor man's Ingram, Richardson, and LeMichael James with BB, Enrique and Jeff Scott.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:27 pm to HogKing111
quote:
Have you started drinking early today adam?
no but clearly you Arky fans have since you guys are ALWAYS THE BEST AT EVERYTHING.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:29 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Ask LSU or Auburn fans about Jeff Scott. And Enrique is bigger and faster than BB. He just isnt as good a pass blocker, doesnt have as good of hands, or vision. Kinda like the difference between Richardson and Ingram. We have a poor man's Ingram, Richardson, and LeMichael James with BB, Enrique and Jeff Scott.
And no quarterback.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:31 pm to sugatowng
quote:
Our DL is probably only second to USC IMO
You're out of your fricking mind- UPig's DL is not better than State's- shite, we may have the best DT's in the conference
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:32 pm to CoonassBulldog
Arkansas doesn't have an NFL caliber DLinemen that I see.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:34 pm to NIH
quote:
Arkansas doesn't have an NFL caliber DLinemen that I see.
That Jake Bequette guy is supposed to be good.
basically almost every Arky fan on here is delusional.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:34 pm to NIH
quote:
And no quarterback
And LSU has one?
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:35 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
And LSU has one?
not the point. FWIW Mett is a good QB just needs time.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:35 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
And no quarterback
And LSU has one?
Well we went 11-2 with him and he's back. What did you go with Masoli, a far superior quarterback to your current options experience wise and probably talent wise.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:36 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Ask LSU or Auburn fans about Jeff Scott
Runs fast, real fast...
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:37 pm to NIH
quote:
Arkansas doesn't have an NFL caliber DLinemen that I see.
they damn sure dont have two as good as what we got in Cox and Boyd
And yes- Mississippi's RB's should be ranked higher than Georgia's- hell, that's the strength of their team
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:37 pm to adammwilson
Youre right, I thought LSU was ranked higher is why I said that. This no QB is just speculation. All three of our QB's are better throwers than Masoli, but I doubt they are as good of game mangagers. Im a pretty objective poster and I say that because this might sound homeristic, but I'd be shocked if our QB doesnt have more passing yards than Masoli did.
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:38 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Youre right, I thought LSU was ranked higher is why I said that. This no QB is just speculation. All three of our QB's are better throwers than Masoli, but I doubt they are as good of game mangagers. Im a pretty objective poster and I say that because this might sound homeristic, but I'd be shocked if our QB doesnt have more passing yards than Masoli did.
Well as long as you don't kill us with the spread and a running quarterback I'm okay with anyone taking snaps at OM that is primarily a passer.
This post was edited on 6/4/11 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:39 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
I'd be shocked if our QB doesnt have more passing yards than Masoli did.
what do you guys have at WR lately?
This post was edited on 6/4/11 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 6/4/11 at 3:39 pm to AMM AU9893
quote:
I think we'll be at least pretty good, 4-7 in the SEC.
Wait ... what? 4-7 in the SEC?
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News