Started By
Message

re: PFF All-SEC week 1 grades

Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by azcatiger
somewhere
Member since Mar 2011
4482 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:29 pm to
I have not seen anything this wrong since. Ever
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15972 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:30 pm to
Thats just how bad the other 9 played
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

why would they choose to highlight and picture the offensive player with the lowest grade and the defensive player with the second lowest grade?


Better question, why didn't any other QB get better than an 84?
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22531 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:32 pm to
Problem with PFF is they grade using formulas and guidelines they created so you have no idea what those numbers even mean. This year they've gotten even more stingy with their content with all CFB related articles and most of their NFL stuff being premium not free. So you can't even read their explanations for the grades unless it's from their Twitter.
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24214 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Guice isn't a running back listed? He had over 100 yards and 2 touchdowns in the first half. Not to mention he got sat halfway into the third.


Guice: 27 carries 122 yards (4.52) 2 TD
1 reception 4 yards

Crockett: 18 carries 202 yards (11.22) 2 TD

Kelly: 19 carries 128 yards (6.7) 4 TD
5 receptions 35 yards
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119154 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Yes?


Then it confirms my suspicion that you are phat phil, cause only he would post something so wrong as something so right.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20360 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:43 pm to
Its simple, Crockett and Kelly had better games than Guice.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95186 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:49 pm to
This is proof that numbers sometimes lie
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33941 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by jcolding41
Member since Sep 2015
5694 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:57 pm to
Hurts has only played one year and I'm already sick of seeing him on headlines like this. I have never seen people hype up such a mediocre player in my life.

Sorry bama fans I don't mean to hammer the kid but if hurts was on any other team he'd be mediocre at best. If y'all had Jeremy Johnson on your team y'all would have won the natty and beaten FSU by 31 points.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

How the frick did 2 Mizzou players make it on SEC defense of the week??


Brandon was pretty much unblockable.

I think Cheadle was only thrown at a few times and had an INT, PBU and no completions against.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter