Started By
Message
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:39 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
It is the truth. Oregon probably should have won, but came out with like three straight bs finesse run calls inside the 5.
That's their offense and no they shouldn't have won. They don't have the personel to line up in the I and play smashmouth football.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:41 pm to marshallcotiger
quote:
They don't have the personel to line up in the I and play smashmouth football.
That is basically what I have been saying.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:42 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Douche.
Who started this thread?
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:43 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
When push came to shove, they couldn't man up and get the last 2 yards. That shite doesn't work against SEC teams.
They did when it mattered though, and got the 2 pt conversion. BTW no one could run well on Auburn all year so it's not like it's an SEC thing.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:43 pm to jsmoove
quote:
Who started this thread?
It is a good thread. It has gone to multiple pages.
You are a douche for calling me a liar. frick you, you frickin douche.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:43 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Can't really count that one. THat was a horrible pass and Adams had no shot.
This would be called squandering an opportunity.
Overthrowing a wide open WR = not punching it in on 4th down.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:44 pm to joshnorris14
I would argue that running for the last yard on the goal line is a much higher percentage play than trying to throw a 50 yard bomb while under pressure.
It is not the same thing. But whatever. The point is taken. Auburn missed chances, too. I get that.
It is not the same thing. But whatever. The point is taken. Auburn missed chances, too. I get that.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:45 pm to Esarhaddon
quote:
They did when it mattered though, and got the 2 pt conversion.
They threw for that. They got the last TD by tricking Auburn with a little shovel pass.
It is still ticky-tack BS.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:45 pm to Esarhaddon
quote:
They did when it mattered though, and got the 2 pt conversion.
LoL.
Are you really that dumb? A fake field goal does not equal manning up and running it 2 yards.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:45 pm to TxTiger82
FWIW lowly Ole Mrs. skewered LSU's D with a former UO QB running that pussy bs
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:47 pm to Esarhaddon
quote:
FWIW lowly Ole Mrs. skewered LSU's D with a former LSU QB running that pussy bs
Yeah I don't know what happened to our D at the end of the year. I was pleased to see us come back with a vengeance against A&M.
I am afraid we looked awesome in that game because A&M was overmatched, and not because we are really that great.
Oh well...we shall see against Oregon in Jerry World, won't we.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:47 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
You are a douche for calling me a liar. frick you, you frickin douche.
Liar. Liar. Liar.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:48 pm to jsmoove
quote:
Liar. Liar. Liar.
Shoo.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:48 pm to joeyb147
quote:
Are you really that dumb? A fake field goal does not equal manning up and running it 2 yards.
Did you even watch the game retard? James scored their last Td.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 2:50 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Oh well...we shall see against Oregon in Jerry World, won't we.
LSU's defenses under both Pelini and Chavis has struggled with that type of offense for some reason.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 3:04 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
What I am saying is obvious. It was a close game
What you SAID was that Oregon should have won. Why don't you own up to the bullshite you are slinging.
Oregon had more redzone opportunities so they should have won? Brilliant. Penalize Auburn in your rationale for scoring twice from outside the redzone. And don't forget to give Oregon credit for AU stopping them twice inside the 5....because that makes sense.
Oregon was dominated at the line of scrimmage and had to toss out their game plan....they were scrappy as hell though and fought back to tie it. Good for them...but it wasn't enough. Twist and turn it any way you like but if you are going to play the "if oregon didn't...and if they had just..." than you have to do the same on Auburn's side...but you don't, so your are a self-deluding fricktard. Congrats.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 3:28 pm to tkane311
So basically what the OP is saying is that if oregon would have capitalized on every opportunity they had and auburn missed every opportunity they had, and if oregon would have played perfectly and au would have just folded then oregon would have won?
Man! Thanks for the insight, I had no idea!
Man! Thanks for the insight, I had no idea!
Posted on 1/11/11 at 3:31 pm to heartbreakTiger
OP, man Oregon was fortunate as hell they played as close as they did. After watching last night I'd say the Ducks wouldn't finish better than 4th in the SECW. They are just too small. The pounding of an SEC schedule would really start to take it's toll in the second half of the season.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 3:49 pm to TxTiger82
Gotta have some beef to shove up the middle
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News