Started By
Message
On3 Sports Jesse Simonton
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:00 pm
Catching up on the NCAA's case against Tennessee, these folks really love losing in court, huh?
I guess the 9-0 decision in the Alston case wasn't enough. NCAA prez Charlie Baker himself has said schools need more control with NIL and (HIS PLAN!) it would move in-house.
Tennessee (and Florida, too) has every right to vigorously fight the allegations.
I guess the 9-0 decision in the Alston case wasn't enough. NCAA prez Charlie Baker himself has said schools need more control with NIL and (HIS PLAN!) it would move in-house.
Tennessee (and Florida, too) has every right to vigorously fight the allegations.
7
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:09 pm to Loganville Vols
The Loganville Johnny's Pizza sucks. The Grayson location is wonderful.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:10 pm to Loganville Vols
You realize the Alston case has nothing to do with this correct? That case said the NCAA could not prevent student athletes from getting NIL money. The issue is not the kid received money but NCAA rules that violate recruiting are. No where have I seen the NCAA said Nico could not get NIL money.
Do not confuse the two cases because UT may have gotten caught buying recruits which the judges never mentioned that or ruled on it.
Do not confuse the two cases because UT may have gotten caught buying recruits which the judges never mentioned that or ruled on it.
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:17 pm to Loganville Vols
Look at this Bama poster below not realizing a deal was made between Nico and Spyre BEFORE committing to a school of choice.
Ignorance at it's best and fears sucking is about to begin for them
Ignorance at it's best and fears sucking is about to begin for them
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:21 pm to Loganville Vols
Florida's case makes absolutely no sense.
At the time, state law forbade schools from coordinating on NIL deals. How can the school be responsible for something it was legally prohibited from being responsible for?
At the time, state law forbade schools from coordinating on NIL deals. How can the school be responsible for something it was legally prohibited from being responsible for?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:26 pm to joshnorris14
And that's why Florida will be joining the lawsuit. If the university had no direct contact with the recruit, then it's fair game.
NILs are not supposed to be directly paid through the school.
NILs are not supposed to be directly paid through the school.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:31 pm to deeprig9
Go to Fratelli’s NY Style Pizza and Restaurant. Pizzas, steaks and Seafood great food.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:35 pm to TideWarrior
Why would Tennessee buy players with the NIL?? That doesn’t make sense. Plus 6 months ago NCAA said Tennessee had the perfect example of the NIL ran program.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:35 pm to Loganville Vols
quote:
Go to Fratelli’s NY Style Pizza and Restaurant. Pizzas, steaks and Seafood great food.
I haven't been myself, but that's who supplies pizza for my kid's nearby private school on Pizza day. He gives it high marks. Do they have a full bar?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:36 pm to Loganville Vols
quote:
NCAA said Tennessee had the perfect example of the NIL ran program.
Let’s see that quote
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:36 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
NCAA rules that violate recruiting are.
What do you feel was the violation?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:45 pm to Smokeyone
Can he list the recruiting violations that Bama was committing but didn't get busted by the NCAA because they were throwing money bags towards their direction?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:46 pm to Smokeyone
In my opinion it doesn't matter if a rule was broken. All NIL rules via NCAA are anti-trust violations as they would naturally prohibit NIL activity. Brett Kavanaugh said as much. Most people see it. You can frame as a Tennessee violation, but if NIL is anywhere in the argument, it's a loser.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:47 pm to Loganville Vols
Tennessee: It wasn't our fault we're not smart enough to understand your rules, NCAA.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:10 pm to Smokeyone
The NCAA is not coming after UT because Nico has a NIL deal. The issue stems from boosters allegedly providing impermissible benefits on behalf of UT for a recruit during the recruiting process.
The Alston case in reference does not discuss or even considered if a school could use NIL to recruit it just said the NCAA could not create any rule preventing NIL deals with players and third parties for NIL contracts. The case or the courts have given no indication that universities can violate NCAA recruiting rules including allowing NIL to be used as an enticement.
Again different issues here but the NCAA still has to prove what is being alleged is a violation. I was just pointing out that the Alston has no value as a reference here.
The Alston case in reference does not discuss or even considered if a school could use NIL to recruit it just said the NCAA could not create any rule preventing NIL deals with players and third parties for NIL contracts. The case or the courts have given no indication that universities can violate NCAA recruiting rules including allowing NIL to be used as an enticement.
Again different issues here but the NCAA still has to prove what is being alleged is a violation. I was just pointing out that the Alston has no value as a reference here.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:17 pm to NukemVol
If what is being reported is correct it has nothing to do with NIL. All the courts said is the NCAA does not have the power to prevent NIL contracts between an athlete and a third party.
Even Kavanaugh which I read his opinion along with the ruling said the NCAA as an organization can not prevent NIL as previous mentioned and to do so future consideration would not be in their favor. Again the NCAA does not have the authority but the courts never said that NIL could not be challenged or change via law as created. Just the NCAA
But again a moot point as this has nothing to do with NIL or anti trust
Even Kavanaugh which I read his opinion along with the ruling said the NCAA as an organization can not prevent NIL as previous mentioned and to do so future consideration would not be in their favor. Again the NCAA does not have the authority but the courts never said that NIL could not be challenged or change via law as created. Just the NCAA
But again a moot point as this has nothing to do with NIL or anti trust
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:20 pm to TideWarrior
UT fans seem to be using the NIL ruling by the courts as a shield but the NCAA is not challenging the courts here or focusing on Nico’s NIL because of the ruling they know they will not stand a chance. They are focusing on rules they do have the authority to enforce in regard to recruiting violations.
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:21 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
The NCAA is not coming after UT because Nico has a NIL deal. The issue stems from boosters allegedly providing impermissible benefits on behalf of UT for a recruit during the recruiting process.
Spyre flying Nico out to talk business is not an impermissible benefit.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:28 pm to LewEvansFan
These UGA and GUMP posters are scared shltless of Nico.
A month ago it was "who cares he sucks"...now it's "NO HE CAN'T PLAY HE MUST BE RULED INELIGIBLE".
Scared fking shltless.
A month ago it was "who cares he sucks"...now it's "NO HE CAN'T PLAY HE MUST BE RULED INELIGIBLE".
Scared fking shltless.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:29 pm to LewEvansFan
Why are you laughing at me as I said what is being reported is an alleged benefit.
The NCAA is not foolish enough to make this solely about NIL even if they were trying to backdoor in away to deal with NIL.
In the end though if the powers to be were not concerned all the grandstanding and organizing lawsuits would not be needed. UT powers are nervous and it shows
The NCAA is not foolish enough to make this solely about NIL even if they were trying to backdoor in away to deal with NIL.
In the end though if the powers to be were not concerned all the grandstanding and organizing lawsuits would not be needed. UT powers are nervous and it shows
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News