Started By
Message
NET Rankings 3/3/24
Posted on 3/3/24 at 10:57 am
Posted on 3/3/24 at 10:57 am
NET Rankings
Dancing
5 Tennesee
6 Auburn
7 Bama
20 Kentucky
32 State
33 Florida
47 USC
NIT
54 a&m
78 Ole Miss
87 LSU
CBI
103 UGA
120 Arkie
Very Bad
151 Mizzou
221 Vandy
Dancing
5 Tennesee
6 Auburn
7 Bama
20 Kentucky
32 State
33 Florida
47 USC
NIT
54 a&m
78 Ole Miss
87 LSU
CBI
103 UGA
120 Arkie
Very Bad
151 Mizzou
221 Vandy
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 10:59 am
8
Posted on 3/3/24 at 10:59 am to WildcatMike
quote:
33 Florida
47 USC
Ridiculous
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:01 am to bigDgator
Actually only one part of that is ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous. Whoever made this computer formula should be embarrassed.
quote:
47 USC
Absolutely ridiculous. Whoever made this computer formula should be embarrassed.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:03 am to bigDgator
USC is getting punished for playing a weak OOC schedule. They only played 6 Q1 games...Florida had played 11 Q1 games. It is what it is, but the NET looks at who you play and get rewarded/punished for the schedule.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:05 am to WildcatMike
Team playing for a SEC title is 47th 
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:19 am to CarolinaGamecock99
quote:
Team playing for a SEC title is 47th
Benefitted from mostly weak OOC schedule and got a break only playing the other top SEC teams once each. (Until UT rematch)
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 11:20 am
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:33 am to WildcatMike
How is it possible for Carolina to be in the 40s NET? They’re 10-3 in Q1/2 games
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:38 am to WildcatMike
We’re still higher than Kentucky
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:43 am to WildcatMike
Kentucky too high
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:43 am to deltaland
Because the computers hate 
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:43 am to Jrv2damac
Well, no shite...Kansas is 7-7 in Q1 games...Kentucky is 5-5. Its not science 
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:45 am to WildcatMike
Lynx told me wins are wins and losses are losses
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:47 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
Lynx
I'm not Lynx...take it up with him.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 11:59 am to bigDgator
quote:
Absolutely ridiculous. Whoever made this computer formula should be embarrassed.
It's horseshite, but whatever. Win 2 games, get a banner.
Really looking forward to Wednesday night.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:01 pm to MetryMauler
quote:
Benefitted from mostly weak OOC schedule and got a break only playing the other top SEC teams once each. (Until UT rematch)
Until last night, we were also the only one of the top 4 that had a road win.
The model is stupid. Florida went up a ranking for losing a hard-fought road game, while USC stayed pat. Square that circle.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:06 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
87 LSU
We comin'.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:10 pm to clamdip
Bama is fine
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:13 pm to WildcatMike
LSU gonna be a dangerous NIT team lol
Posted on 3/3/24 at 1:10 pm to WildcatMike
Those rankings are dated 03/02. Are we sure those rankings reflect Saturday’s games?
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:58 pm to Toneski
quote:
Are we sure those rankings reflect Saturday’s games?
Yes
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News