Started By
Message
re: NCAAT Blind Basketball Resume
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:29 am to WDE24
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:29 am to WDE24
quote:
But the first one was playing more difficult teams hence the much better sos and rpi.
Yea, this is why blind resumes kinda suck.
You have a team that is 4-5 vs top 50 RPI and another that is 4-8
But the first team could be SEC with most of the 9 games being against UGA, TAMU, LSU. ANd the second team could be in the ACC with most of the 12 games against UVA, Duke, UNC, Notre Dame, Louisville.
Totally different level of competition. 4-8 vs the latter is way better than 4-5 vs the former
This post was edited on 3/15/15 at 10:31 am
0
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:29 am to pioneerbasketball
You have to look at who the teams were though. Using vs. Top 100 only equates the number 1 team to the number 100. That is why sos has to matter with this limited info.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:45 am to WDE24
updated.
Out of the first 3 teams, only one made the ncaaT.
Out of the first 3 teams, only one made the ncaaT.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 11:44 am to pioneerbasketball
Year to year comparisons for bubble teams don't really work imo. Blind resume comparisons should be made against this field not previous years.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News