Started By
Message
re: NCAA wants to change scholy limit from 85 to 80
Posted on 1/13/12 at 12:56 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Posted on 1/13/12 at 12:56 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
why is this an attack on the SEC then
8 of the top 20 recruiting classes currently in Rivals are SEC schools. They are obviously taking a shot at the top dogs.
This post was edited on 1/13/12 at 1:37 pm
1
Posted on 1/13/12 at 12:58 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
It's bullshite that some schools can have 3 deep in talent.
Is this sarcasm?
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:00 pm to CoolHand
quote:
8 of the top 20 recruiting classes currently in Rivals are SEC schools.
Could it be possible that we have 8 in the top 20 bc the SEC is the best football conference?
quote:
They are obviously taking a shot at the top dogs.
Or they're tired of the Big 10 and Big 12-4 bitching about us
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:04 pm to CoolHand
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:04 pm to CoolHand
Helps Boise, hurts power programs. Waaayyyy more Boise votes than Bama, LSU, USC votes, etc.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:14 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
yea this hurts everyone
Not UF, returning less than 60 scholarships for 2012
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:22 pm to dapado33
5 per team is about 600 fewer free college educations per cycle. Shouldn't the NCAA be working to get more athletes into college, instead of limiting opportunity? This is awful.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:27 pm to CoolHand
quote:
scholarships from 85 to 80, beginning in 2014.”
Damn USC's 75 scholarship limit doesn't look so terrible anymore
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:28 pm to CoolHand
quote:
SEC hatin
Fix your thread title. This is a good topic and might not get clicks.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:29 pm to CoolHand
So they've went from unlimited schollies in the 70's, to 105, to 95, 85, and now 80? If it hasn't solved the 'problem' yet, maybe it isn't the solution. Maybe when these other schools start devoting the time, money, and resources(not to mention fan support) that most of the SEC schools do, they'll achieve this magical 'parity'. Everyone want's a trophy, but they don't want to do the work.
Maybe the solution is to treat it like T-ball and call everyone a winner for showing up.
Maybe the solution is to treat it like T-ball and call everyone a winner for showing up.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:30 pm to attheua
quote:
5 per team is about 600 fewer free college educations per cycle. Shouldn't the NCAA be working to get more athletes into college, instead of limiting opportunity? This is awful.
smaller schools are trying to save money. this is how they are doing it...by eliminating 5 scholarships.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:36 pm to CoolHand
quote:
Big Boy hatin (was SEC hatin)
You're still doing it wrong. How about 'NCAA discusses further limiting schollies'?
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:39 pm to CoolHand
quote:
NCAA wants to change scholy limit from 85 to 80
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:39 pm to northshorebamaman
Better?
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:41 pm to CoolHand
This is the point where 4 superconferences of 16 schools wouild tell the NCAA to GTFO.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:42 pm to RollDawgRoll
That might end the association with the NCAA.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:43 pm to RollDawgRoll
quote:
This is the point where 4 superconferences of 16 schools wouild tell the NCAA to GTFO.
And take our bowl games with us.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 3:13 pm to RollDawgRoll
quote:I'd like that for a lot of reasons, but I imagine the cheating would become unbearable fairly quickly.
This is the point where 4 superconferences of 16 schools wouild tell the NCAA to GTFO.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 3:16 pm to CoolHand
Let's see... 120 FBS schools x 5 schollys each = 600 people not going to college that may otherwise have.
FRICK YEA, NCAA! It's all about the students!
FRICK YEA, NCAA! It's all about the students!
Posted on 1/13/12 at 3:22 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Let's see... 120 FBS schools x 5 schollys each = 600 people not going to college that may otherwise have.
FRICK YEA, NCAA! It's all about the students!
Actually it would be about 1,200 not going to college because it means if those schools drop 5 male athlete scholarships, then they can drop 5 female ones from a money draining sport and still comply with Title IX.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News