Started By
Message

re: NCAA Rules Committee Proposes to Eliminate HUNH

Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:35 pm to
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19691 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

So why doesn't the D get set faster? Our D didn't have a problem with it.
your D was terrible
Posted by Gnar Cat21
Piña Coladaburg
Member since Sep 2009
16838 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

your D was terrible



good enough to beat... frick it never mind
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:36 pm to
Auburn call Whitehorse and sue their arse. (Worked for the Cam thing)
Posted by partsman103
Member since Sep 2008
8090 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

 It is suspended. Pretty stupid. 

If you have a problem with HUNH, just outlaw it. HUNH is fine apparently when it is needed to win games in the last few minutes, however all other times it is barbaric and hazardous to player health!


I agree. What's next? Will the ncaa adopt rules from the UpWard leagues?
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

If you have a problem with HUNH, just outlaw it. HUNH is fine apparently when it is needed to win games in the last few minutes, however all other times it is barbaric and hazardous to player health!




lol it's just so ridiculous it's funny
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:47 pm to
Saban is such a whinny bitch. Player safety with the hurry up?? Really?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34884 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

your D was terrible



What does this have to do with their ability to substitute?
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30840 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 9:01 pm to
I've thought saban was a ego maniac, pompous, jackass but I always respected his ability to compete and coach football.

Turns out he's just a whiny little bitch to boot.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32410 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 9:01 pm to
Saban crys again..
Posted by windsor1977
Member since Aug 2012
1154 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 9:57 pm to
Great post!
Posted by TailbackU
ATL
Member since Oct 2005
11089 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

A HUNH O has an extra advantage


I forgot we get to play 12 players. Thanks for the reminder.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 10:39 pm to
Haven't read the 44 pages. Is it safe to assume that there is near unanimous consent that flagging a team for snapping the ball too fast after it's been placed is just idiotic? I seriously cannot think of one legitimate reason that the offense can't snap the ball the second the ball is put into play by the refs.

To me it is no different than saying we will no longer allow fast breaks in basketball. Fast breaks just aren't fair to the defense. You have to give them time to set up. From now on, on turnovers or change of possession, you must slow down and set up your offense so that the defense can catch their breath and set up. If you shoot the ball with 20 seconds or more left on the shot clock, the offense will be called for a bench foul and the defense will be awarded 2 free throws.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 10:44 pm to
This is what Auburn gets for trolling everyone a couple of weeks ago about supposedly claiming more titles.
Posted by northalabamacracker
Glasgow
Member since Sep 2011
6466 posts
Posted on 2/13/14 at 11:55 pm to
I think the only reasonable thing to do is to never change
another rule. They should have never legalized the forward pass.


But seriously, the not snapping the ball until 10 seconds have ran is not the issue. The issue is whether or not the defense should be given a chance to sub.

But this horseshite about not changing rules is retarded. How many times have the rules been changed in just the last decade, much less the last 80 years?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95114 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 12:12 am to
quote:

But seriously, the not snapping the ball until 10 seconds have ran is not the issue. The issue is whether or not the defense should be given a chance to sub.
There is absolutely no rule that says the defense can't sub before the snap against a hunh. The reason they don't is because the hurry up tries to take that away with the quick pace. Just like there is no rule against a defender making a tackle, but the running back tries to run faster to avoid that. Maybe we should make running faster and jukes illegal too
Posted by northalabamacracker
Glasgow
Member since Sep 2011
6466 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 12:21 am to
quote:

The issue is whether or not the defense should be given a chance to sub.



I guess you need this explained. When I said chance, that implied without the offense trying to snap it before they get a chance to sub. What are you? fricking stupid?


And I'm not arguing for or against this proposed rule either way.



quote:

Just like there is no rule against a defender making a tackle, but the running back tries to run faster to avoid that. Maybe we should make running faster and jukes illegal too



Thanks for confirming.

So no rules changes should ever be made is what you are saying? Likr when they legalized the forward pass or when they ended the penalty for an incomplete pass?



This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 12:27 am
Jump to page
Page First 42 43 44
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 44 of 44Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter