Started By
Message
re: Mullen Leaving MSU question
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:56 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:56 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Uh, no, the BCS "national championship game" didn't exist in 2003, only BCS bowl games in which SC won theirs and were awarded a NC as a result.
1
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:01 pm to cardboardboxer
The "BCS National Championship Game" was first played in 2006.
LSU played in the Sugar bowl in 2003, SC won the NC beating Michigan in the Rose Bowl that year.
LSU played in the Sugar bowl in 2003, SC won the NC beating Michigan in the Rose Bowl that year.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:06 pm to Harry Knuckles
Come on dude! How in the hell would that make a lick of sense. You are as moron.
I am sorry I didn't mean to think in my head that you are a trailer trash retard. Please forgive me for my unpure thoughts.
I am sorry I didn't mean to think in my head that you are a trailer trash retard. Please forgive me for my unpure thoughts.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:09 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
The "BCS National Championship Game" was first played in 2006.
LSU played in the Sugar bowl in 2003, SC won the NC beating Michigan in the Rose Bowl that year.
I hope you're joking.
The first BCS National Championship game was in '98 when Tennessee beat Florida State
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:17 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:21 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
The "BCS National Championship Game" was first played in 2006.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:26 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
I hope you're joking.
The first BCS National Championship game was in '98 when Tennessee beat Florida State
Wrong, that was the Fiesta Bowl.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:27 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Wrong, that was the Fiesta Bowl.
Which was designated as the "BCS National Championship game" that season. It rotated to each of the 4 BCS bowls every year.
LINK
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:33 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Each poll still was able to award their own NC for the year, the only thing that changed prior to the implementation of the actual BCS National Championship game in 2006 was the system paired the #1 and #2 team in a bowl game, unlike prior years where #1 and #2 may not have matched up in a bowl game.
The possibility and reality that the NC for that season was not in the bowl game with #1 vs #2 did in fact occur and exist, 2003 being the shining example.
It wasn't until the implementation separating the National Championship game from a bowl or regular season game (As we saw occur in 1969) in 2006 with the BC NC game did we see consecutive consensus NC awarded each year, and has occurred since.
The possibility and reality that the NC for that season was not in the bowl game with #1 vs #2 did in fact occur and exist, 2003 being the shining example.
It wasn't until the implementation separating the National Championship game from a bowl or regular season game (As we saw occur in 1969) in 2006 with the BC NC game did we see consecutive consensus NC awarded each year, and has occurred since.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:40 pm to DawgPhoneGuy
All this "Dan Leaving" talk needs to stop.
Dan & Megan are well aware of the possible job offers but they are planning on staying in Starkville a long time & raising Breelyn & Canon here... (AD has promised to match highest offer when the time comes)
Dan & Megan are well aware of the possible job offers but they are planning on staying in Starkville a long time & raising Breelyn & Canon here... (AD has promised to match highest offer when the time comes)
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:43 pm to DakForHe15man
quote:
AD has promised to match highest offer when the time comes
Posted on 10/9/14 at 11:11 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Each poll still was able to award their own NC for the year, the only thing that changed prior to the implementation of the actual BCS National Championship game in 2006 was the system paired the #1 and #2 team in a bowl game, unlike prior years where #1 and #2 may not have matched up in a bowl game.
The possibility and reality that the NC for that season was not in the bowl game with #1 vs #2 did in fact occur and exist, 2003 being the shining example.
It wasn't until the implementation separating the National Championship game from a bowl or regular season game (As we saw occur in 1969) in 2006 with the BC NC game did we see consecutive consensus NC awarded each year, and has occurred since.
Omfg
Posted on 10/9/14 at 11:44 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Each poll still was able to award their own NC for the year,
The Coaches Poll was contractually obligated to vote whichever team won the game designated as the NC game #1 in their final poll. Three coaches did violate this and voted for USC over LSU.
The AP was free to vote whoever they wanted to as #1, and they can still do that even with the playoff.
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:03 am to BamaDude06
Ok the subject has drastically changed!
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:20 am to BamaDude06
Louisiana state held the coaches pole and USC wonthe AP title. Split champions.
Posted on 10/10/14 at 11:46 am to Volmanac
Bump
Anyone care to answer the question?
Anyone care to answer the question?
Posted on 10/10/14 at 11:48 am to DawgPhoneGuy
Please change thread title to "Look at all these scared bitches in this thread"
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:29 pm to ATLRebel
quote:
Nick Saban in '03 is the only one that comes to min
Saban stayed one more year at LSU before he left.
Posted on 10/10/14 at 7:36 pm to Gold Tiger
So the answer is no it has never happened?
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News