Started By
Message
re: Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:32 pm to thatdude1985
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:32 pm to thatdude1985
quote:Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.
what?
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:42 pm to kilo
quote:
kilo
who on your schedule gives you that impression?
are you serious? i hope not.
because the BCS, AP, CP, and everyone else disagrees. i mean im an AUB and i wouldve picked bama over mizzou at any point in the season last year
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:48 pm to kilo
quote:
Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.
Oh..ok. You got some problems at home or something? Is this your way of dealing with it? The wife hates your guts so you come and make a ridiculous thread on a forum? Is this what you do? Man.....I have an idea.....Mizzou(whatever the frick that is) would lose by at least 17.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:02 pm to kilo
quote:
Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:19 pm to kilo
Bama couldn't even beat a team that couldn't win the B12. This is a no-brainer.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:27 pm to roadhouse
No shite OP.
Water is wet.
They got worked by Oklahoma! Lol!
Water is wet.
They got worked by Oklahoma! Lol!
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:31 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
Do you even Big3 football???
Does Auburn?
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:31 pm to roadhouse
quote:
Bama couldn't even beat a team that couldn't win the B12. This is a no-brainer.
Mizzou couldnt beat a team that lost to Tennessee
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:32 pm to kilo
Bama was the better matchup.
We eat up pocket QBs, we've always struggled with a mobile QB and the option.
Auburn was the worst possible matchup in that game.
We eat up pocket QBs, we've always struggled with a mobile QB and the option.
Auburn was the worst possible matchup in that game.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:36 pm to Sleeping Tiger
No doubt, our pass rush would have scarred the other side of McCarron's head.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:38 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:Why is this y'all's main argument? Oklahoma beat y'all's bowl opponent.
They got worked by Oklahoma! Lol!
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:41 pm to CockRocket
quote:
Why is this y'all's main argument? Oklahoma beat y'all's bowl opponent
Not to mention, their own record against OU.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:42 pm to CockRocket
God I hate the off season.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:48 pm to kilo
I think stating is as a certainty is stupid, but I would have given Mizzou an even shot to win that game.
Certainly not a ridiculous argument.
Certainly not a ridiculous argument.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 5:08 pm to kilo
probably. the WR vs DB match up was hugely in mizzous favor
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 4/8/14 at 5:34 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
Missouri was unable to stop Auburn's run game with that stupid 3 down lineman front you used. What makes you think you would have stopped Alabama's running game?
It was a conventional running game - and Missouri did quite well against those in 2013.
Most fans felt they matched up better against Bama than Auburn because of that fact. That and the last time they faced an exotic, option style offense (Navy in a Bowl game), they got their clocks cleaned almost as bad.
The better question is how would Alabama have stopped Missouri's offense?
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:10 pm to kilo
mizzou fans still don't understand what SEC east means
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:22 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Bama was the better matchup.
We eat up pocket QBs, we've always struggled with a mobile QB and the option.
Auburn was the worst possible matchup in that game.
ST speaks the truth. Not saying whether or not Mizzou would have beaten Bama, but we'd match up better against them than Auburn.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:44 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
mizzou fans still don't understand what SEC east means
Yeah. Watching Ole Miss go in dry on y'all this year was a load of laughs.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News