Started By
Message

re: Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.

Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27422 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

what?
Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.
Posted by All4Qtrs
tCapitol
Member since Nov 2013
1056 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

kilo


who on your schedule gives you that impression?
are you serious? i hope not.

because the BCS, AP, CP, and everyone else disagrees. i mean im an AUB and i wouldve picked bama over mizzou at any point in the season last year
Posted by thatdude1985
Oxford, AL
Member since Oct 2011
27038 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.


Oh..ok. You got some problems at home or something? Is this your way of dealing with it? The wife hates your guts so you come and make a ridiculous thread on a forum? Is this what you do? Man.....I have an idea.....Mizzou(whatever the frick that is) would lose by at least 17.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15391 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Mizzou would have beaten Bama in the SECCG this year.



Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:19 pm to
Bama couldn't even beat a team that couldn't win the B12. This is a no-brainer.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:27 pm to
No shite OP.

Water is wet.

They got worked by Oklahoma! Lol!
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Do you even Big3 football???

Does Auburn?
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15391 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Bama couldn't even beat a team that couldn't win the B12. This is a no-brainer.


Mizzou couldnt beat a team that lost to Tennessee
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:32 pm to
Bama was the better matchup.

We eat up pocket QBs, we've always struggled with a mobile QB and the option.

Auburn was the worst possible matchup in that game.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:36 pm to
No doubt, our pass rush would have scarred the other side of McCarron's head.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

They got worked by Oklahoma! Lol!

Why is this y'all's main argument? Oklahoma beat y'all's bowl opponent.
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Why is this y'all's main argument? Oklahoma beat y'all's bowl opponent

Not to mention, their own record against OU.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:42 pm to
So did we
Posted by bamakat
anniston, al
Member since Nov 2010
1684 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:42 pm to
God I hate the off season.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79179 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:48 pm to
I think stating is as a certainty is stupid, but I would have given Mizzou an even shot to win that game.

Certainly not a ridiculous argument.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 5:08 pm to
probably. the WR vs DB match up was hugely in mizzous favor
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 5:09 pm
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Missouri was unable to stop Auburn's run game with that stupid 3 down lineman front you used. What makes you think you would have stopped Alabama's running game?


It was a conventional running game - and Missouri did quite well against those in 2013.

Most fans felt they matched up better against Bama than Auburn because of that fact. That and the last time they faced an exotic, option style offense (Navy in a Bowl game), they got their clocks cleaned almost as bad.

The better question is how would Alabama have stopped Missouri's offense?
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:10 pm to
mizzou fans still don't understand what SEC east means
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Bama was the better matchup.

We eat up pocket QBs, we've always struggled with a mobile QB and the option.

Auburn was the worst possible matchup in that game.



ST speaks the truth. Not saying whether or not Mizzou would have beaten Bama, but we'd match up better against them than Auburn.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

mizzou fans still don't understand what SEC east means


Yeah. Watching Ole Miss go in dry on y'all this year was a load of laughs.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter