Started By
Message
re: Miss St and Grind talk
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:29 am to Hardy_Har
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:29 am to Hardy_Har
quote:
Start a thread asking if people would rather have Bro or Dak in the huddle this year on the main board.
Settle this shite like men.
Had that thread yesterday, which engie bitched out on after I brought the stats out. It's funny because I hate Bo Wallace, but he is just flat out much better than Dak.
3
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:29 am to Requiem For A Dawg
People like fireman and rebman601 always make me laugh. You know 90% of the time their post will reflect on how much MSU sucks
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:29 am to engie
Just in case you missed it since it was the last post on the page.
quote:
Why is there male cheerleaders on every advanced collegiate competition cheerleading squad? Because their strength is needed in advanced routines -- and that strength can not be mimicked by females. Hence why those males are in higher demand than the female counterparts -- in the same way that a girl with a gymnastics and advanced tumbling background is in higher demand than one that doesn't have those things...
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:30 am to engie
quote:
Damian Robinson
They're not even comparable at this point. Nobody wanted Robinson except the two of us. Multiple other schools wanted Taylor.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:30 am to REBEL5 AC
Hahahahahaha rod was said to be the best lineman at the UA game by more then one site
This post was edited on 5/23/14 at 9:31 am
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:30 am to Rebels_to_Cover
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:30 am to REBEL5 AC
To be fair Dak hasn't had the same amount of PT to really make a legit comparison to Bo. We'll find out for sure this fall
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:31 am to UMTigerRebel
This is the same guy who argued that State's all time losing record was deceptive
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:33 am to REBEL5 AC
Link me back pls...
Obviously, Bo was better. He accounted for fewer tds per play and yards per play both overall and in conference, with a worse total QBR. But I'm sure there's some stat you can skew out there...
Obviously, Bo was better. He accounted for fewer tds per play and yards per play both overall and in conference, with a worse total QBR. But I'm sure there's some stat you can skew out there...
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:33 am to TupeloReb
Which is what I have been saying in defense to Dak...doesn't matter. To engie, you either say Dak is the GOAT or GTFO.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:34 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
I hate Bo Wallace, but he is just flat out much better than Dak.
No one really knows this answer yet. If you are gonna call Engie out for being a homer, then you shouldn't make posts like this.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:34 am to UMTigerRebel
And what part of what I said was unreasonable?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:34 am to engie
quote:
engie, pls
156/267 58.4% 1940yards 10TD 7INT 126.6QBR
134rushes 829yards 6.2ypc 13TDs
283/437 64.8% 3346yards 18TDs 10INT 138.1QBR
131rushes 355yards 2.7ypc 6TDs
LOL, I don't even have to put the names up there. So, do you want to go by total yards? Total TDs? QBR? Pass yards? Completion percentage? Just let me know, so I can "spin" these stats
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:35 am to DMagic
quote:
This is the same guy who argued that State's all time losing record was deceptive
Because we don't actually have an all-time losing record?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:36 am to Requiem For A Dawg
quote:
No one really knows this answer yet. If you are gonna call Engie out for being a homer, then you shouldn't make posts like this.
As of now, Bo is better. That is a fact. Could Dak be better? Sure, but he has to prove it. That's literally all I have said this whole time. But engie is scrounging for stupid arse statistics to say Dak has had a better career to-date, which is why I'm even responding because that shite is so laughable.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:36 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
LOL, I don't even have to put the names up there. So, do you want to go by total yards? Total TDs? QBR? Pass yards? Completion percentage? Just let me know, so I can "spin" these stats
Another attempt at conveniently spinning the fact that Dak played in less than 9 total games last year.
How about overall yards per play and overall TDs per play along with total QBR. That tells the story alot better than a 13game vs 9game straight stat comparison, wouldn't you say?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:37 am to engie
quote:
Because we don't actually have an all-time losing record?
frick, dude. Wrong again.
All-time record 516–549–39 (.485)
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:37 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
As of now, Bo is better
No he isn't.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:38 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
frick, dude. Wrong again.
All-time record 516–549–39 (.485)
How dumb are you?
That's not our all-time record.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 9:38 am to engie
Yes you do
Page 3 of 13
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News