Started By
Message
re: Manziel cleared to play?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:05 pm to bigpapamac
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:05 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
That. I've said it all along, he did it but there's no way the NCAA will be able do jack about it.
The NCAA can do whatever they want, if they want...
The Jesse Pate situation proved that, it ended with an apology from the NCAA...
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:05 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
In the meeting, the NCAA simply explained that through their investigation they were unable to find proof or even strong circumstantial evidence that Manziel accepted payment for signing memorabilia.
Couldn't of been too simple to take 6 hours
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:06 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
That. I've said it all along, he did it but there's no way the NCAA will be able do jack about it.
I agree, but I still think the article is bullshite because the NCAA has plenty of strong circumstantial evidence, so I can't imagine why they would say they don't. They likely have no proof, but there is no reasonable explanation for why he signed that much stuff in that short a time for one guy other than monetary compensation.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:06 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
This doesn't make any sense. They may not, and probably don't, have proof, but the mere fact that he signed thousands of pictures, footballs, helmets, etc. for a sports memorabilia dealer is strong circumstantial evidence that he accepted payment.
Unless they are forgeries.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:07 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
The NCAA can do whatever they want, if they want...
With all the heat they're currently taking from their policies and "amateurism" rules, I'm sure they're just dying to take away JFF's eligibility over something like this...
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:07 pm to GerryDiNardo
quote:
Unless they are forgeries
Wut? You can't be serious.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:08 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
still think the article is bullshite
Oh no doubt.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:13 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
the NCAA has plenty of strong circumstantial evidence,
you don't knwo what they have.
all reports have indicated the brokers were not going to work with the NCAA.
without that, there really isn't much for the NCAA to go on.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:14 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Not saying this isn't true, but this is the author's first article on that site.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:16 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Not saying this isn't true, but this is the author's first article on that site.
The site is like sportsbybrooks with you filling in as brooks.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
Yeah I have plans to release the actual videos and affidavits right after the Alabama game. Make you a deal Aggies, Beat Bama and those videos get chucked right in the trash. Or trade you for 50 yard line tickets versus LSU, and a slab of beef for the smoker. (you can eat some too. We share at Tiger stadium) Now if any Bama or UT alum get copies you are screwed.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:21 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I very clearly posted it as a question. I have no idea if it's true or not, but I figured it was relevant.
I could have gone gung-ho with the title and had 50 responses in five minutes if I had a mind to do it
we all know what you're about
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:26 pm to bigpapamac
He will be cleared just like Cam, they would rather punish on the back end then to end TAMUs cash cow now.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:27 pm to Dr RC
quote:
the NCAA has plenty of strong circumstantial evidence,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you don't knwo what they have.
all reports have indicated the brokers were not going to work with the NCAA.
without that, there really isn't much for the NCAA to go on.
Yea, he knows what kind of circumstantial evidence the NCAA has. The whole world has pretty strong circumstantial evidence in this case. We all know that he signed thousands and thousands of autographs for brokers, that's accepted fact at this point. That's strong circumstantial evidence as it's hard to imagine somebody doing that for free. What the NCAA likely doesn't have, and probably won't get, is hard evidence like financial transactions that they could "convict" him with.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:36 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
With all the heat they're currently taking from their policies and "amateurism" rules, I'm sure they're just dying to take away JFF's eligibility over something like this...
NO NO NO NO
Seriously take the NCAA's perspective. Either allow him to play and the quality of the games will decrease or allow him to play and the hype continues.
Why do aTm fans continue to think the NCAA is out to suspend him at all costs? They aren't people, chill out.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:42 pm to Winston-Wolf
quote:
Why do aTm fans continue to think the NCAA is out to suspend him at all costs? They aren't people, chill out.
This.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:50 pm to Winston-Wolf
I think your sarcasm meter is broken if you thought I was saying the NCAA wants to suspend him
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:51 pm to Roger Klarvin
9-3.....losses to Bama, LSU, and a scrub
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:58 pm to dkreller
I get that he will likely be cleared, I get that they have no hard evidence on the money. Having no strong circumstantial evidence, yeah that one I don't get.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News