Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:11 am to BartnBrigLSU
this whole fiasco is a sh*t show and an embarrassment to the SEC it needs to go away
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:13 am to mattloc
Yea man, SEC 4 Lyfe!!!1
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:15 am to mattloc
quote:
this whole fiasco is a sh*t show and an embarrassment to the SEC it needs to go away
Who the frick really holds the SEC in such high regards?
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:22 am to cas4t
What the LSU administration has admitted to:
Changing the language in the contract from "between 24 and 36 months" to "between the first day of the 36th month and the last day of the 24th month"
What Chavis now has to do:
Turn over phone records that were previously held out of evidence in the case.
Seems like LSU got the better end of this deal.
Changing the language in the contract from "between 24 and 36 months" to "between the first day of the 36th month and the last day of the 24th month"
What Chavis now has to do:
Turn over phone records that were previously held out of evidence in the case.
Seems like LSU got the better end of this deal.
This post was edited on 12/18/15 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:22 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Stop this bullshite right now. It is stupid when Bama fans do it, but it a least makes sense with L5U. It's is a pathetic copy of something stupid when LSU people use it.
Agreed. Everyone knows it's Tran5fer A&M, anyway.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to FishFearMe
How much of that money will you get? Because I'm not losing any money over it.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to FishFearMe
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to mattloc
quote:
this whole fiasco is a sh*t show and an embarrassment to the SEC it needs to go away
Your fan base destroyed any good image the SEC could have thought of having
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:28 am to OLDBEACHCOMBER
quote:
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
Because lawyers love to hear themselves talk, the correct answer here is maybe.
But in reality, it's not going to make a huge difference either way, the physical language was altered, but the deal itself stayed the same and was actually clarified. Even if the judge relies on the original wording nothing is going to change.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:29 am to OLDBEACHCOMBER
quote:
Looks like Chavis knew of the changes at the time they were made. Not sure if it makes a difference in the case at all.
The actual changes:
John Lombardi's name was removed when he was fired and Mark Ewing added William Jenkins' name, who replaced Lombardi on an interim basis.
Ewing changed the language regarding the buyout dates from “between 24 months to 36 months” to “between the first day of the 36th month remaining to the last day of the 24th month remaining.”
He also changed language in the buyout dates from “between 11 months and 23 months” to “between the first day of the 23rd month remaining to the last day of the 12th month.”
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:32 am to LNCHBOX
How about no.
It's clever. Props to them for coming up with it.
It's clever. Props to them for coming up with it.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:59 am to 80884
quote:
Looks to me like they might go after him for recruiting violations...
Not going to happen simply because Chavis doesn't recruit
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:03 pm to PLaneTiger
quote:that's the violation.
Not going to happen simply because Chavis doesn't recruit
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:08 pm to FishFearMe
NOPE... Chavis will lose on the 3rd and the Jury play.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:39 pm to PLaneTiger
quote:
Looks to me like they might go after him for recruiting violations...
Not going to happen simply because Chavis doesn't recruit
That's the beauty of it. All those years not recruiting and when he finally does - BAM.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:12 pm to mattloc
You should address this to the LSU AD who modified 3rd and Chavis contract after he signed it and then filed a large lawsuit against 3rd and Chavis.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:34 pm to FishFearMe
quote:
LSU About To Pay 3rd and Chavis Again
Highly doubtful. Chavis will lose this lawsuit.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:45 pm to FishFearMe
does this make up for the $20 we owe from 1994?
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:50 pm to FishFearMe
Altered and ratified by Chavis. tamu fricked either way. If they win and Chavis was still working for LSU in January, they'll be turned in for recruiting violations. I don't get why tamu fans are so happy about all this. Shouldn't they be scouting the intramural flag football teams for a QB?
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News