Started By
Message
Let's get this straight
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:03 pm
The last time Auburn won the National Championship....
Eisenhower was in the White House...
Fonzie was hanging out at Arnolds...
And the Cheezwhiz had not yet been born:
But, because of one special recruit, Bama is going down the tubes?
Eisenhower was in the White House...
Fonzie was hanging out at Arnolds...
And the Cheezwhiz had not yet been born:
But, because of one special recruit, Bama is going down the tubes?
8
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:04 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:07 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
now go beat off with ingram's tears as lube
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:07 pm to Gotigers57
Which of the above is factually incorrect? 
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:09 pm to beaver
quote:
now go beat off with ingram's tears as lube
Will Ben Tate's work?
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:11 pm to BamaFan89
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:11 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
pointless thread + lame flame attempt = 
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:15 pm to beaver
quote:
now go beat off with Tebow's tears as lube
FIFY
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:33 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
Let's not leave Sputnik out of this.
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:35 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:
But, because of one special recruit, Bama is going down the tubes?
This is your bama brethren acting this way for the most part, not Auburn people fwiw
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:40 pm to secftw
wt does tebow have to do with this pointless flame thread?
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:44 pm to roadGator
Another championship AU coach was on probation.
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:46 pm to roadGator
This thread is not pointless. The point is that Chizzy Whizzy is irrelevant...
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:47 pm to roadGator
quote:
wt does tebow have to do with this pointless flame thread?
Looks like he was collateral damage in another Region induced, butthurt flame thread.
Guess we need to call "The Bearboog" on the OP.
Posted on 2/8/10 at 9:59 pm to AUriptide
Doppelgangers, or the same person?
Posted on 2/8/10 at 10:04 pm to JumboPackage
quote:
Doppelgangers, or the same person?
Auburn had to sign him in order to get her.
Posted on 2/8/10 at 10:16 pm to JumboPackage
And the fact of the matter is that this bitch is no good...she has character issues and grade problems.
Posted on 2/8/10 at 10:36 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:
Let's get this straight
Auburn has never won one as "Auburn." they were still called Alabama polytech. so it was at LEAST that far back.
Posted on 2/9/10 at 12:17 am to m2pro
Alabama Polytech had half a NC in 1957. Aubarn has never won a NC.
Posted on 2/9/10 at 5:51 am to JaboStokes
i guess we could get some fans to create and almanac and go back and award us a 7 or 8 retro-active national championships like the mullets did. half of them yall claim are retro active championships which yall were not even close to being ranked #1 in any of the major polls... so suck on that flamer! 
1925, 1926, 1930. All back-dated titles. These titles were awarded years after the fact. Four teams could claim a back-dated title in 1925, eight teams in 1926, and two in 1930.
1934--The first year for the AP poll, given to Minnesota.
1941--The most egregious of Alabama's bogus titles. Alabama finished the season with 2 losses and ranked #20 in the final AP poll. But one of the minor selectors out of over 30 chose Alabama, and evidently, that's the only excuse they needed. Alabama finished 3rd in the sec that year.
1973--Alabama goes 11-1. Notre Dame goes 11-0 and is crowned by the AP as NC. Who did the Irish beat in the Sugar Bowl? Why, Alabama--for their only loss
True, we only claim one, but know this: If we used the University of Alabama method of determining MNCs, which is claiming back-dated titles and claiming titles awarded by minor, inferior selectors, we could claim six--1913, 1914, 1957, 1983, 1993, 2004. Thankfully, we take the high road and do not! The university officially recognizes only ONE--1957.
1925, 1926, 1930. All back-dated titles. These titles were awarded years after the fact. Four teams could claim a back-dated title in 1925, eight teams in 1926, and two in 1930.
1934--The first year for the AP poll, given to Minnesota.
1941--The most egregious of Alabama's bogus titles. Alabama finished the season with 2 losses and ranked #20 in the final AP poll. But one of the minor selectors out of over 30 chose Alabama, and evidently, that's the only excuse they needed. Alabama finished 3rd in the sec that year.
1973--Alabama goes 11-1. Notre Dame goes 11-0 and is crowned by the AP as NC. Who did the Irish beat in the Sugar Bowl? Why, Alabama--for their only loss
True, we only claim one, but know this: If we used the University of Alabama method of determining MNCs, which is claiming back-dated titles and claiming titles awarded by minor, inferior selectors, we could claim six--1913, 1914, 1957, 1983, 1993, 2004. Thankfully, we take the high road and do not! The university officially recognizes only ONE--1957.
This post was edited on 2/9/10 at 6:02 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News