Started By
Message
re: Let's Get Hypothetical
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:46 am to DynastyDawg
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:46 am to DynastyDawg
I think it's the most interesting hypothetical coming out of the SEC right now. Specifically with these teams, and of course if it happened, how the actual games played out would be helpful, but all 3 teams would have an amazing case.
Georgia are the actual champs, but are merely 1-1 against the toughest SECw teams (no disrespect to Arky)
Ole Miss looks like the easiest drop, but that punishes them for having the extra game.
Miss St would have been the best team for so long, lose one away game and are shoved out of the race in preference for teams who had already lost? so cruel.
I would lean towards Miss St as most deserving, but I really don't know. Curious what the rant takes are.
Georgia are the actual champs, but are merely 1-1 against the toughest SECw teams (no disrespect to Arky)
Ole Miss looks like the easiest drop, but that punishes them for having the extra game.
Miss St would have been the best team for so long, lose one away game and are shoved out of the race in preference for teams who had already lost? so cruel.
I would lean towards Miss St as most deserving, but I really don't know. Curious what the rant takes are.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:47 am to BearBait09
quote:
AU>UGA MISS>ALA OLE>MISS UGA>OLE 11-2 UGA SECC 11-2 Ole Miss 11-1 Miss St who do you want to see picked out of SEC by committee assuming only one SEC team gets in?
How does AU>UGA = UGA 11-2?
They'd be 10-2 at seasons end and would need missouri to drop another game to be in the SECCG.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:48 am to BearBait09
MISS>ALA
Then WTF does this mean?
Then WTF does this mean?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:49 am to N97883
quote:
I've never seen Miss = Mississippi state.
I grew up in a Big Ten town, MSU is Michigan State to me.
MSU, USC and UT I never use on the rant to refer to anyone, not trying to confuse people but I just can't refer to the SEC teams by those acronyms and if I used them for Southern Cal, Texas, or Michigan State it would just confuse people, so I don't use them at all.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:49 am to BearBait09
Bear,
Go grab some coffee, and come back and RA for the anchor.
Go grab some coffee, and come back and RA for the anchor.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:52 am to BearBait09
Yeah but the committee already said they put emphasis on Conference Championships.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:57 am to WDE24
quote:
Not if he had AU losing to UGA in the SECCG. But he left a lot unsaid in his op.
True. I am guessing he had Auburn losing to Alabama.
Either way, Georgia would have had an easier schedule....it would be a mess. Obviously, I would WANT Georgia to go, but not too sure we would deserve it. In the scenario I am describing, I would say Miss St. would deserve to go.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:58 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Go grab some coffee, and come back and RA for the anchor.
maybe YOU should grab a BEER.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:01 am to BearBait09
Go to a Big 12 board.
All I know is Baylor and no other Big 12, 10, 11 however many teams there are now .. won't be participating.
All I know is Baylor and no other Big 12, 10, 11 however many teams there are now .. won't be participating.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 8:02 am
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:04 am to RonBurgundySliver
you don't tell me what to do. you're not my real dad.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:15 am to BearBait09
This is very tough.
I think they'd put State. I really do.
I think they'd put State. I really do.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News