Started By
Message
re: Kyle Allen Starting?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:01 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:01 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
I'm anxiously awaiting the nickname his family is going to trademark.
Let's do some brainstorming to start the process:
Kyle "the Vile" Allen
Kyle "Not Brandon" Allen
"Futile" Kyle Allen
0
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:18 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
That is what everyone said about Johnny.
How could people have said that when Johnny was the starter at the beginning of the year and not getting his first start in the 9th game of the year
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:19 pm to Dr. Shultz
quote:
How could people have said that when Johnny was the starter at the beginning of the year and not getting his first start in the 9th game of the year
Not sure, but it was definitely said
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:24 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:
What makes you think Hill is better?
He trill. Duh?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:27 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
tLandmass really fricked up Kenny Trill.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:37 pm to BigOrangeWave
Kid cant talk to that red headed trainer chick anymore.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 4:22 pm to Team Vote
quote:
No, they don't understand you need a running game outside of a scrambling QB
This. Our running schemes are a joke. They're simple, predictable, and unwarranted. I really thought after the McKinney demotion that Spavital would fix this but he's taken the same course his predecessor has which is a crime, imo. We have 2 kids who were 5 stars coming out of high school. They're good and very capable. And they waste away on the bench because none of them can ever get 10 carries a game, and when they do get an opportunity, it's blown up because the defense knows what's coming. It's not a zone read if hill never keeps the damn ball every once in a while. It's like "here you go, run that way, and don't get tackled" Pathetic.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 4:32 pm to Dr RC
quote:
While Kyle Allen has been a bit pick prone the one thing I can give him is he does make quicker decisions in the pocket than Hill.
It sounds crazy but perhaps something so small really could be the main reason the offense has bogged down so much. It kind of reminds me of when Sherman was rolling with McGee at QB and the dude for whatever reason would wait entirely too long to get it out of there which consistently screwed the play.
Fair point.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 5:29 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
I'm anxiously awaiting the nickname his family is going to trademark.
Kyle "Not Brandon" Allen
Posted on 10/30/14 at 6:30 pm to dead money
quote:
This. Our running schemes are a joke. They're simple, predictable, and unwarranted. I really thought after the McKinney demotion that Spavital would fix this but he's taken the same course his predecessor has which is a crime, imo. We have 2 kids who were 5 stars coming out of high school. They're good and very capable. And they waste away on the bench because none of them can ever get 10 carries a game, and when they do get an opportunity, it's blown up because the defense knows what's coming. It's not a zone read if hill never keeps the damn ball every once in a while. It's like "here you go, run that way, and don't get tackled" Pathetic.
I haven't been able to watch much of yall but if this is the case regarding your run game, then that's half of your problem that needs to be addressed. You ve got to have the QB keeping the ball even if he isn't a true dual threat QB. You've gotta keep the defense honest. We were extremely predictable in 2009 with Chris Todd at QB. We had a very solid OL, but our running game was definitely crippled by having a pocket passer at QB.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News