Started By
Message
re: Kentucky vs Baylor UK 62, Baylor 67 Over
Posted on 12/7/13 at 12:41 am to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 12/7/13 at 12:41 am to BluegrassBelle
New Kentucky shirts fit right following the loss.
I'm kidding ya'll. You will be fine. Get a 2 or 3 seed and get to the final four. Miss the entire game though.
I'm kidding ya'll. You will be fine. Get a 2 or 3 seed and get to the final four. Miss the entire game though.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 12:57 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
BTW we only made 3 FGs in the last 14 minutes of the game. That seems to be more of an issue than anything.
Especially when you struggle from the line like they did
Posted on 12/7/13 at 1:45 am to Buttermilk Pancakes
I would rather have a team of players for 4 years to grow together as a team, rather than Kentucky's one and done's. They just have horrible chemistry. Also have a lot of ball hogs who refuse to pass the ball.
UK will probably be a second round to sweet 16 type team this year and that's so underwhelming with all that talent.
UK will probably be a second round to sweet 16 type team this year and that's so underwhelming with all that talent.
This post was edited on 12/7/13 at 1:47 am
Posted on 12/7/13 at 1:47 am to Buttermilk Pancakes
quote:
New Kentucky shirts fit right following the loss.
I'm kidding ya'll. You will be fine. Get a 2 or 3 seed and get to the final four. Miss the entire game though.
That's pretty awesome
Posted on 12/7/13 at 2:12 am to Gcockboi
quote:
Gcockboi
If I'm not mistaken, I believe USCe has been flooded with 4 year players, yet struggle to break .500 every year. I'll take UKs talent every day of the week.
Oh yeah, and...23-21.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 2:16 am to vol017
There is a difference between Horn's 2 and low 3 star unathletic players and the guys Frank Martin is bringing in. Give Frank a few yeas to build and develop talent and we will be a sweet 16 type team with team chemistry every year.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 2:30 am to Gcockboi
quote:
we will be a sweet 16 type team with team chemistry every year.
Making the tourney on occasion, sure. Sweet 16 every year, highly unlikely. The SEC doesn't produce those outside of UK and Fla.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 3:14 am to Gcockboi
quote:
I would rather have a team of players for 4 years to grow together as a team, rather than Kentucky's one and done's. They just have horrible chemistry. Also have a lot of ball hogs who refuse to pass the ball. UK will probably be a second round to sweet 16 type team this year and that's so underwhelming with all that talent.
I went to A&M. I don't know s*** about bball. But off the top of my noggin it seems like this is the Michigan State route and seems like it works pretty well.
It's also the A&M route, but those poor white kids don't have an option.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 5:56 am to vol017
LSU is back and will compete for the sec crown guys.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 6:59 am to Gcockboi
I do not understand the love for Frank Martin.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 7:05 am to roadGator
Am I crazy for thinking LSU and UF both look better than uk?
Tis is 2-3 weeks of inconsistent pay for the cats.
Tis is 2-3 weeks of inconsistent pay for the cats.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 7:31 am to Gcockboi
quote:
They just have horrible chemistry. Also have a lot of ball hogs who refuse to pass the ball.
Not even close why they lost this game.
quote:
UK will probably be a second round to sweet 16 type team this year and that's so underwhelming with all that talent.
Fab Five lost many games…in fact, they were a high seed when they were freshman.
This post was edited on 12/7/13 at 7:32 am
Posted on 12/7/13 at 7:58 am to Gcockboi
quote:
Give Frank a few yeas to build and develop talent and we will be a sweet 16 type team with team chemistry every year.
I think you're gonna end up pretty disappointed if you think that's happening.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 8:19 am to DRE06
Do you realize how much more successful UK has been than Mich State the last 5 years? Yet you think Mich State has it figured out. You're right, you don't understand basketball.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News