Started By
Message

KenPom Rankings 2/1

Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:10 am
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:10 am

KenPom 2/1
5 Auburn
6 Tennessee
8 Bama
23 Kentucky
31 Florida
33 State
46 USC
47 a&m


61 Ole Miss
69 UGA


85 LSU



106 Arkansas
116 Mizzou




193 Vandy

Posted by CarolinaGamecock99
Member since Apr 2015
21867 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:16 am to
I mean what do we have to do? How can you put Miss St 13 spots higher?
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
2171 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I mean what do we have to do? How can you put Miss St 13 spots higher?


Same here! There are not 60 teams better than we are.
Posted by clevelandblackbear
Member since Oct 2014
40 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:22 am to
18-3 loses to number 5, 6, and 85. Beats 31, 33, and 47. Best we can do is 61. I really don't understand how this ranking system works.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23884 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I mean what do we have to do? How can you put Miss St 13 spots higher?


These are the teams that are around us...



Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:28 am to
quote:

CarolinaGamecock99


Told you, you want Kentucky and Tennessee to continue to win.
Posted by Legionfield
Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
2578 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:30 am to
Bama looks fine…
Posted by Dawg4Life47
Beach
Member since Sep 2013
8430 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:45 am to
16-6 Bradley is ahead of GA, not sure I trust this list
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65021 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:52 am to
quote:

There are not 60 teams better than we are.


How do you know that?
Posted by benoit_BayouBengals
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
2404 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:58 am to
Ahead of Arkansas, I'll take it.
Posted by Opry
Member since Oct 2023
2019 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:00 am to
All things considered, Bama is probably over-achieving this year. Oats holding together till next year gets here.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I mean what do we have to do? How can you put Miss St 13 spots higher?
Kenpom is an analytic model based on how efficient your team is offensively and defensively. It has nothing to do with your win loss record. If you want better Kenpom numbers you have to be more efficient on both ends.
Posted by themetalreb
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2018
4000 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:19 am to
Well, I know for a fact Ole Miss is better than two of those teams in front of them lol...I love the fact that Ole Miss has beaten two teams in front of them, including one on the road. It's cool that head to head matchups don't matter. That seems totally fair****
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19126 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:21 am to
Tennessee is ahead of schedule. We usually don't start falling until late February or early March.
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
6775 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Kenpom is an analytic model based on how efficient your team is offensively and defensively. It has nothing to do with your win loss record. If you want better Kenpom numbers you have to be more efficient on both ends.



isnt net similar as well. taking analytics into consideration?


at the end of the day, winning is what matters. its frustrating that we are rewarding teams for losing, and punishing teams that win
Posted by TiggerWoods
Auburn
Member since Nov 2010
3977 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:27 am to
Ole Miss squeaked by a heap of shitty teams in non conference and have been blown out a couple of times in conference play. Not great for the efficiency ratings.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 9:27 am
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22654 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:30 am to
They're not trying to hide what they are and wins and losses do matter. The point of NET is really to separate teams that are very similar when it comes time to fill out the field. I mean there are 68 teams in the damn tournament. If your team doesn't make it, then it's their own fault.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

isnt net similar as well. taking analytics into consideration?
Net uses analytics, far too heavily in my opinion, but also considers W/L and who and where those were played.

quote:

its frustrating that we are rewarding teams for losing, and punishing teams that win
The analytics aren’t really designed to reward or punish. They are intended to be used prospectively, as opposed to a ranking of team’s resumes or what they have done up to that point. That’s why the focus isn’t W/L, but efficiency metrics. My take is they were designed to have an objective analytical model to predict future outcomes more accurately.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 9:41 am
Posted by themetalreb
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2018
4000 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:40 am to
It's true Ole Miss has a couple bad losses, (always embarrassing to lose to Auburn), but they've also beaten Memphis, MSU, and A&M on the road.
Posted by JLFVFFL
In your head
Member since Dec 2021
53 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 9:58 am to
Give em time. it'll happen
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter